Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry

Jari Kettunen, Kari Laakso

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

This report provides an analysis and evaluation of incident analysis methods and practices applied by the Finnish regulator Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) and the two Finnish nuclear power plant operators Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) and Fortum Power and Heat Oy (Fortum). The study was conducted in 1998-99. The research material was based on tape-recorded interviews as well as internal directions and event investigation reports provided by the three participating organisations. A framework for analysis and evaluation was developed as part of the study on the basis of referenced root cause analysis and operating experience review methods, selected (foreign) inspection reports, scientific papers and research literature. Well-known inspection methods and principles, such as ASSET and MTO/HPES, provided important guidance to this work. This study shows that although all the evaluated organisations had rather comprehensive incident analysis arrangements, more focus and priorisation is needed. Deficiencies were identified mostly in the areas of recording, assessment and classification of new events and observations, use of existing operating experience data, utilisation of information technology based tools, and allocation of work and resources. In general, the direct causes of identified events can be detected and removed, but more emphasis should be given to the prevention of recurrence. This requires a more efficient feedback loop that can be created and maintained by focusing on the root causes of significant events, tasks and activities in which the originating errors occurred, and weaknesses of defensive barriers, and by implementing periodic operational experience reviews. A strategy document for the operating experience feedback process, and firm procedures for the initial assessment of new events and the carrying-out of data analyses would help.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationHelsinki
PublisherRadiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK
Number of pages100
Publication statusPublished - 1999
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

NameSTUK-YTO-TR
PublisherRadiation and Nuclear Safety Authority
No.160
ISSN (Print)0785-9325

Fingerprint

Nuclear energy
Inspection
Feedback
Tapes
Nuclear power plants
Information technology
Industry
Radiation
Hot Temperature

Cite this

Kettunen, J., & Laakso, K. (1999). Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry. Helsinki: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK. STUK-YTO-TR, No. 160
Kettunen, Jari ; Laakso, Kari. / Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry. Helsinki : Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK, 1999. 100 p. (STUK-YTO-TR; No. 160).
@book{d47c021b0dc940c5babb0bbc32f89a2d,
title = "Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry",
abstract = "This report provides an analysis and evaluation of incident analysis methods and practices applied by the Finnish regulator Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) and the two Finnish nuclear power plant operators Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) and Fortum Power and Heat Oy (Fortum). The study was conducted in 1998-99. The research material was based on tape-recorded interviews as well as internal directions and event investigation reports provided by the three participating organisations. A framework for analysis and evaluation was developed as part of the study on the basis of referenced root cause analysis and operating experience review methods, selected (foreign) inspection reports, scientific papers and research literature. Well-known inspection methods and principles, such as ASSET and MTO/HPES, provided important guidance to this work. This study shows that although all the evaluated organisations had rather comprehensive incident analysis arrangements, more focus and priorisation is needed. Deficiencies were identified mostly in the areas of recording, assessment and classification of new events and observations, use of existing operating experience data, utilisation of information technology based tools, and allocation of work and resources. In general, the direct causes of identified events can be detected and removed, but more emphasis should be given to the prevention of recurrence. This requires a more efficient feedback loop that can be created and maintained by focusing on the root causes of significant events, tasks and activities in which the originating errors occurred, and weaknesses of defensive barriers, and by implementing periodic operational experience reviews. A strategy document for the operating experience feedback process, and firm procedures for the initial assessment of new events and the carrying-out of data analyses would help.",
author = "Jari Kettunen and Kari Laakso",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
series = "STUK-YTO-TR",
publisher = "Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK",
number = "160",
address = "Finland",

}

Kettunen, J & Laakso, K 1999, Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry. STUK-YTO-TR, no. 160, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK, Helsinki.

Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry. / Kettunen, Jari; Laakso, Kari.

Helsinki : Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK, 1999. 100 p. (STUK-YTO-TR; No. 160).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry

AU - Kettunen, Jari

AU - Laakso, Kari

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This report provides an analysis and evaluation of incident analysis methods and practices applied by the Finnish regulator Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) and the two Finnish nuclear power plant operators Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) and Fortum Power and Heat Oy (Fortum). The study was conducted in 1998-99. The research material was based on tape-recorded interviews as well as internal directions and event investigation reports provided by the three participating organisations. A framework for analysis and evaluation was developed as part of the study on the basis of referenced root cause analysis and operating experience review methods, selected (foreign) inspection reports, scientific papers and research literature. Well-known inspection methods and principles, such as ASSET and MTO/HPES, provided important guidance to this work. This study shows that although all the evaluated organisations had rather comprehensive incident analysis arrangements, more focus and priorisation is needed. Deficiencies were identified mostly in the areas of recording, assessment and classification of new events and observations, use of existing operating experience data, utilisation of information technology based tools, and allocation of work and resources. In general, the direct causes of identified events can be detected and removed, but more emphasis should be given to the prevention of recurrence. This requires a more efficient feedback loop that can be created and maintained by focusing on the root causes of significant events, tasks and activities in which the originating errors occurred, and weaknesses of defensive barriers, and by implementing periodic operational experience reviews. A strategy document for the operating experience feedback process, and firm procedures for the initial assessment of new events and the carrying-out of data analyses would help.

AB - This report provides an analysis and evaluation of incident analysis methods and practices applied by the Finnish regulator Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) and the two Finnish nuclear power plant operators Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) and Fortum Power and Heat Oy (Fortum). The study was conducted in 1998-99. The research material was based on tape-recorded interviews as well as internal directions and event investigation reports provided by the three participating organisations. A framework for analysis and evaluation was developed as part of the study on the basis of referenced root cause analysis and operating experience review methods, selected (foreign) inspection reports, scientific papers and research literature. Well-known inspection methods and principles, such as ASSET and MTO/HPES, provided important guidance to this work. This study shows that although all the evaluated organisations had rather comprehensive incident analysis arrangements, more focus and priorisation is needed. Deficiencies were identified mostly in the areas of recording, assessment and classification of new events and observations, use of existing operating experience data, utilisation of information technology based tools, and allocation of work and resources. In general, the direct causes of identified events can be detected and removed, but more emphasis should be given to the prevention of recurrence. This requires a more efficient feedback loop that can be created and maintained by focusing on the root causes of significant events, tasks and activities in which the originating errors occurred, and weaknesses of defensive barriers, and by implementing periodic operational experience reviews. A strategy document for the operating experience feedback process, and firm procedures for the initial assessment of new events and the carrying-out of data analyses would help.

M3 - Report

T3 - STUK-YTO-TR

BT - Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry

PB - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK

CY - Helsinki

ER -

Kettunen J, Laakso K. Evaluation of incident analysis practices in the Finnish nuclear power industry. Helsinki: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK, 1999. 100 p. (STUK-YTO-TR; No. 160).