Abstract
No single solution can meet the diverse decarbonization needs of the NRMM (non-road mobile machinery) sector. Instead, the focus should be on identifying the most viable decarbonization methods for specific use cases, given the wide range of operational requirements, working cycles, and environments within NRMM. Existing studies often lack detailed, up-to-date comparisons of energy carrier options for specific NRMM segments, with most addressing the issue at a general level or focusing on individual technologies.
This study aims to fill that gap by examining the key factors influencing decarbonization solutions for four common NRMM use cases: agricultural tractors, forestry equipment, port applications, and construction machinery. It limits its scope to electricity-based energy carriers (e-fuels, battery electric, and hybrid solutions) due to the exclusion of biogenic alternatives by the European Commission. The primary objective is to assess mechanisms affecting CO2 emissions, excluding other pollutants, and to provide more detailed insights compared to prior studies, which often lack precision in reflecting real-world boundaries and use cases. The study highlights several viable energy carrier alternatives to fossil diesel for decarbonizing NRMM, emphasizing that their feasibility is heavily influenced by their use case, policy and future regulations.
This study aims to fill that gap by examining the key factors influencing decarbonization solutions for four common NRMM use cases: agricultural tractors, forestry equipment, port applications, and construction machinery. It limits its scope to electricity-based energy carriers (e-fuels, battery electric, and hybrid solutions) due to the exclusion of biogenic alternatives by the European Commission. The primary objective is to assess mechanisms affecting CO2 emissions, excluding other pollutants, and to provide more detailed insights compared to prior studies, which often lack precision in reflecting real-world boundaries and use cases. The study highlights several viable energy carrier alternatives to fossil diesel for decarbonizing NRMM, emphasizing that their feasibility is heavily influenced by their use case, policy and future regulations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 139394 |
| Journal | Fuel |
| Volume | 426 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 2026 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
This work was funded by Business Finland DECARBO project, grant number 7351/31/2022. The authors would like to acknowledge all supporting partners for the valuable inputs to this study, enabling the authors to develop the tool presented in this study and to address the given topic is such detail.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of low carbon energy-carrier options for future non-road mobile machinery: A multisector case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
DECARBO : Decarbonization of Mobile Machine Systems
Shah, S. (Manager), Antila, M. (Participant), Pettinen, R. (Participant), Vänttinen, L. (Participant) & Hyrynen, J. (Owner)
2/01/23 → 31/12/24
Project: Business Finland project
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver