Abstract
Chromium poisoning is a widely recognized degradation
process in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC). Stainless steel
interconnect plates, in direct contact with the cathode,
have been identified as the major chromium source,
raising a need for electrically conducting protective
coatings for the interconnects. This work evaluates four
different manganese-cobalt protective coatings
manufactured on thin steel foils, made by three
commercial companies and a research centre. Area specific
resistance, coating microstructure, and chromium
retention are compared. Measurements were done in a humid
atmosphere over 1000 hours at 700 °C. An innovative
measurement setup was used, in which the coated steel
samples are stacked adjacent to thin palladium foils with
a screen-printed lanthanum strontium cobalt layer,
replicating an SOFC cathode. As a conclusion, TeerCoating
Ltd's and Turbocoating S.p. A's coatings performed
similar to the Sandvik Material Technology's
cerium-cobalt reference coating, and could be employed as
such in SOFC applications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1597-1608 |
| Journal | ECS Transactions |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- cathodes
- chromium
- cobalt
- manganese
- fuel cells
- protective coatings
- stainless steel
- area-specific resistances
- chromium poisoning
- degradation process
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of protective coatings for SOFC interconnects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver