Experience on in-service damage in power plant components

Jorma Salonen, Pertti Auerkari, Olli Lehtinen, Mikko Pihkakoski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two principal groups of failure mechanisms appear in power plant components. On one hand, each component is usually known to suffer at least potentially from certain failure mechanisms that are expected and largely accounted for in design, manufacturing and assembly of the plant. Such mechanisms include for example creep, fatigue and corrosion under the foreseen service conditions. Even these mechanisms can contribute to real failures, because the real plant and its components may not turn out to fulfil the requirements, or because the plant is used longer or under different conditions from those initially expected. On the other hand, something unexpected can also happen in real service, so that other than expected failure mechanisms may intervene.
Examples are shown on both types of failure mechanisms. Creep damage can be expected to limit the component life in superheaters and hot steam lines.
Inspections on creep damage are widely used to indicate minimum life, or allowable time to next inspection. In general, unexpected failures are therefore not very common even after exceeding the nominal design life. However, unexpected mechanisms such as internal thermal shock cracking in the steam lines can result in failures much earlier than design life limit.
Such damage is much more difficult to accommodate in the inspection and preventive maintenance programs, because it is more difficult to observe and inherently missed from the expected mechanism list.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)970-977
JournalEngineering Failure Analysis
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Steam piping systems
Power plants
Creep
Inspection
Superheaters
Preventive maintenance
Thermal shock
Fatigue of materials
Corrosion

Keywords

  • damage
  • creep
  • creep damage
  • thermal fatigue
  • power plants
  • residual life

Cite this

Salonen, Jorma ; Auerkari, Pertti ; Lehtinen, Olli ; Pihkakoski, Mikko. / Experience on in-service damage in power plant components. In: Engineering Failure Analysis. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 970-977.
@article{0f92f78f0c67469b82c13b20b7795f42,
title = "Experience on in-service damage in power plant components",
abstract = "Two principal groups of failure mechanisms appear in power plant components. On one hand, each component is usually known to suffer at least potentially from certain failure mechanisms that are expected and largely accounted for in design, manufacturing and assembly of the plant. Such mechanisms include for example creep, fatigue and corrosion under the foreseen service conditions. Even these mechanisms can contribute to real failures, because the real plant and its components may not turn out to fulfil the requirements, or because the plant is used longer or under different conditions from those initially expected. On the other hand, something unexpected can also happen in real service, so that other than expected failure mechanisms may intervene. Examples are shown on both types of failure mechanisms. Creep damage can be expected to limit the component life in superheaters and hot steam lines. Inspections on creep damage are widely used to indicate minimum life, or allowable time to next inspection. In general, unexpected failures are therefore not very common even after exceeding the nominal design life. However, unexpected mechanisms such as internal thermal shock cracking in the steam lines can result in failures much earlier than design life limit. Such damage is much more difficult to accommodate in the inspection and preventive maintenance programs, because it is more difficult to observe and inherently missed from the expected mechanism list.",
keywords = "damage, creep, creep damage, thermal fatigue, power plants, residual life",
author = "Jorma Salonen and Pertti Auerkari and Olli Lehtinen and Mikko Pihkakoski",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "970--977",
journal = "Engineering Failure Analysis",
issn = "1350-6307",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Experience on in-service damage in power plant components. / Salonen, Jorma; Auerkari, Pertti; Lehtinen, Olli; Pihkakoski, Mikko.

In: Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2007, p. 970-977.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience on in-service damage in power plant components

AU - Salonen, Jorma

AU - Auerkari, Pertti

AU - Lehtinen, Olli

AU - Pihkakoski, Mikko

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Two principal groups of failure mechanisms appear in power plant components. On one hand, each component is usually known to suffer at least potentially from certain failure mechanisms that are expected and largely accounted for in design, manufacturing and assembly of the plant. Such mechanisms include for example creep, fatigue and corrosion under the foreseen service conditions. Even these mechanisms can contribute to real failures, because the real plant and its components may not turn out to fulfil the requirements, or because the plant is used longer or under different conditions from those initially expected. On the other hand, something unexpected can also happen in real service, so that other than expected failure mechanisms may intervene. Examples are shown on both types of failure mechanisms. Creep damage can be expected to limit the component life in superheaters and hot steam lines. Inspections on creep damage are widely used to indicate minimum life, or allowable time to next inspection. In general, unexpected failures are therefore not very common even after exceeding the nominal design life. However, unexpected mechanisms such as internal thermal shock cracking in the steam lines can result in failures much earlier than design life limit. Such damage is much more difficult to accommodate in the inspection and preventive maintenance programs, because it is more difficult to observe and inherently missed from the expected mechanism list.

AB - Two principal groups of failure mechanisms appear in power plant components. On one hand, each component is usually known to suffer at least potentially from certain failure mechanisms that are expected and largely accounted for in design, manufacturing and assembly of the plant. Such mechanisms include for example creep, fatigue and corrosion under the foreseen service conditions. Even these mechanisms can contribute to real failures, because the real plant and its components may not turn out to fulfil the requirements, or because the plant is used longer or under different conditions from those initially expected. On the other hand, something unexpected can also happen in real service, so that other than expected failure mechanisms may intervene. Examples are shown on both types of failure mechanisms. Creep damage can be expected to limit the component life in superheaters and hot steam lines. Inspections on creep damage are widely used to indicate minimum life, or allowable time to next inspection. In general, unexpected failures are therefore not very common even after exceeding the nominal design life. However, unexpected mechanisms such as internal thermal shock cracking in the steam lines can result in failures much earlier than design life limit. Such damage is much more difficult to accommodate in the inspection and preventive maintenance programs, because it is more difficult to observe and inherently missed from the expected mechanism list.

KW - damage

KW - creep

KW - creep damage

KW - thermal fatigue

KW - power plants

KW - residual life

U2 - 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 970

EP - 977

JO - Engineering Failure Analysis

JF - Engineering Failure Analysis

SN - 1350-6307

IS - 6

ER -