Feasibility of power production with pyrolysis and gasification systems

Yrjö Solantausta, Tony Bridgwater, David Beckman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the development potential of advanced power production systems based on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Several alternative process configurations and power plant types (diesel, gas turbine, combined cycle) were compared to conventional steam cycle power plants. Electricity production capacities between 5 to 60 MWe were included. It was shown that although presently more expensive than conventional alternatives, all the new options have potential for further development. The biomass to power projects are most likely at sites, where low cost side products are available in countries, which have a favourable electricity tariff or subsidies for renewables.
These projects are often small scale. Under these extreme circumstances capital intensive, high efficiency thermal biomass power technologies have difficulties in competing with conventional technology with lower investment cost and lower efficiency. However, environmental taxes and increasing fuel costs will improve the competitiveness of new biomass fuelled power plant concepts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-269
JournalBiomass and Bioenergy
Volume9
Issue number1-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995
MoE publication typeB1 Article in a scientific magazine

Fingerprint

gasification
pyrolysis
biomass power
Gasification
power plant
power plants
Biomass
Pyrolysis
Power plants
biomass
electricity
cost
environmental tax
Electricity
thermal power
Costs
competitiveness
production system
tariffs
turbine

Keywords

  • gasification

Cite this

Solantausta, Yrjö ; Bridgwater, Tony ; Beckman, David. / Feasibility of power production with pyrolysis and gasification systems. In: Biomass and Bioenergy. 1995 ; Vol. 9, No. 1-5. pp. 257-269.
@article{376a5bb551254b628447a5d4161fe622,
title = "Feasibility of power production with pyrolysis and gasification systems",
abstract = "The objective of the study was to evaluate the development potential of advanced power production systems based on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Several alternative process configurations and power plant types (diesel, gas turbine, combined cycle) were compared to conventional steam cycle power plants. Electricity production capacities between 5 to 60 MWe were included. It was shown that although presently more expensive than conventional alternatives, all the new options have potential for further development. The biomass to power projects are most likely at sites, where low cost side products are available in countries, which have a favourable electricity tariff or subsidies for renewables. These projects are often small scale. Under these extreme circumstances capital intensive, high efficiency thermal biomass power technologies have difficulties in competing with conventional technology with lower investment cost and lower efficiency. However, environmental taxes and increasing fuel costs will improve the competitiveness of new biomass fuelled power plant concepts.",
keywords = "gasification",
author = "Yrj{\"o} Solantausta and Tony Bridgwater and David Beckman",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0961-9534(95)00095-X",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "257--269",
journal = "Biomass and Bioenergy",
issn = "0961-9534",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-5",

}

Feasibility of power production with pyrolysis and gasification systems. / Solantausta, Yrjö; Bridgwater, Tony; Beckman, David.

In: Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 9, No. 1-5, 1995, p. 257-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of power production with pyrolysis and gasification systems

AU - Solantausta, Yrjö

AU - Bridgwater, Tony

AU - Beckman, David

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The objective of the study was to evaluate the development potential of advanced power production systems based on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Several alternative process configurations and power plant types (diesel, gas turbine, combined cycle) were compared to conventional steam cycle power plants. Electricity production capacities between 5 to 60 MWe were included. It was shown that although presently more expensive than conventional alternatives, all the new options have potential for further development. The biomass to power projects are most likely at sites, where low cost side products are available in countries, which have a favourable electricity tariff or subsidies for renewables. These projects are often small scale. Under these extreme circumstances capital intensive, high efficiency thermal biomass power technologies have difficulties in competing with conventional technology with lower investment cost and lower efficiency. However, environmental taxes and increasing fuel costs will improve the competitiveness of new biomass fuelled power plant concepts.

AB - The objective of the study was to evaluate the development potential of advanced power production systems based on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Several alternative process configurations and power plant types (diesel, gas turbine, combined cycle) were compared to conventional steam cycle power plants. Electricity production capacities between 5 to 60 MWe were included. It was shown that although presently more expensive than conventional alternatives, all the new options have potential for further development. The biomass to power projects are most likely at sites, where low cost side products are available in countries, which have a favourable electricity tariff or subsidies for renewables. These projects are often small scale. Under these extreme circumstances capital intensive, high efficiency thermal biomass power technologies have difficulties in competing with conventional technology with lower investment cost and lower efficiency. However, environmental taxes and increasing fuel costs will improve the competitiveness of new biomass fuelled power plant concepts.

KW - gasification

U2 - 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00095-X

DO - 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00095-X

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 257

EP - 269

JO - Biomass and Bioenergy

JF - Biomass and Bioenergy

SN - 0961-9534

IS - 1-5

ER -