TY - JOUR
T1 - Final report on key comparison EURAMET.M.P-K1.c in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure
AU - Altlntaş, Aykurt
AU - Koçaş, Ilknur
AU - Durgut, Yasin
AU - Bartolo, Joseph
AU - Bergoglio, Mercede
AU - Bermanec, Lovorka Grgec
AU - Bošnjaković, Alen
AU - Burzić, Sanja
AU - Condereys, Antoine
AU - Dobre, Miruna
AU - Farar, Peter
AU - Hetherington, Paul
AU - Medina, Nieves
AU - Sabuga, Wladimir
AU - Ott, Oliver
AU - Konczak, Thomas
AU - Sandu, Ion
AU - Setina, Janez
AU - Steindl, Dietmar
AU - Vámossy, Csilla
AU - Waller, Bernard
AU - Wuethrich, Christian
AU - Brzozowski, Adam
AU - Geel, Jan Van
AU - Saxholm, Sari
AU - Arrhén, Fredrik
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - A EURAMET key comparison of the national pressure standards in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure was carried out. The circulation of the transfer standard began in November 2011 and lasted until November 2016. The measurand of the comparison was the effective area of the piston-cylinder assembly determined by gauge pressure measurements in the range from 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa. As the comparison reference value, the weighted mean of the results of the laboratories with primary pressure standards was used. With this reference value, all the participants who delivered the results demonstrated equivalence respective to the reference value within expanded uncertainties (k = 2) on all the range. The results of this comparison were linked to CCM key comparison CCM.P-K1.c. Also in relation to the reference values of CCM.P-K1.c, all participants demonstrated agreement within expanded uncertainties (k = 2) at all pressure points.
AB - A EURAMET key comparison of the national pressure standards in the range 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa of gas gauge pressure was carried out. The circulation of the transfer standard began in November 2011 and lasted until November 2016. The measurand of the comparison was the effective area of the piston-cylinder assembly determined by gauge pressure measurements in the range from 0.7 MPa to 7.0 MPa. As the comparison reference value, the weighted mean of the results of the laboratories with primary pressure standards was used. With this reference value, all the participants who delivered the results demonstrated equivalence respective to the reference value within expanded uncertainties (k = 2) on all the range. The results of this comparison were linked to CCM key comparison CCM.P-K1.c. Also in relation to the reference values of CCM.P-K1.c, all participants demonstrated agreement within expanded uncertainties (k = 2) at all pressure points.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088290693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/07022
DO - 10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/07022
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088290693
VL - 57
JO - Metrologia
JF - Metrologia
SN - 0026-1394
IS - 1
M1 - 07022
ER -