Fire retardants and product behaviour in fire tests

Esko Mikkola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fire safety aspects of polymeric materials in various types of use have led to finding effective ways to reduce the ease of ignition, flame spread and heat evolved as well as the amount of smoke, toxic and corrosive gases produced. Depending on the polymer and the end‐use application of the product, different fire‐retardant methods are used with the aim of passing criteria in fire tests related to the end‐use application. In most cases the classification criteria for reaction to fire behaviour are based on the assumption that early phase fire development is the main hazard. This means that the key elements for effective fire retardants are to delay ignition and to reduce heat release and smoke production, at least during the early part of exposure. This short review intends to summarize the different aspects of product performance in fire testing relevant for product development and classification purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1222 - 1225
Number of pages4
JournalPolymer International
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Flame Retardants
Flame retardants
Fires
Smoke
Ignition
Flammability testing
Caustics
Poisons
Polymers
Product development
Chemical elements
Hazards
Gases
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • fire retardant
  • fire testing
  • classification
  • polymers
  • end-use application

Cite this

Mikkola, Esko. / Fire retardants and product behaviour in fire tests. In: Polymer International. 2000 ; Vol. 49, No. 10. pp. 1222 - 1225.
@article{0d18293062e64899a06545544a096999,
title = "Fire retardants and product behaviour in fire tests",
abstract = "Fire safety aspects of polymeric materials in various types of use have led to finding effective ways to reduce the ease of ignition, flame spread and heat evolved as well as the amount of smoke, toxic and corrosive gases produced. Depending on the polymer and the end‐use application of the product, different fire‐retardant methods are used with the aim of passing criteria in fire tests related to the end‐use application. In most cases the classification criteria for reaction to fire behaviour are based on the assumption that early phase fire development is the main hazard. This means that the key elements for effective fire retardants are to delay ignition and to reduce heat release and smoke production, at least during the early part of exposure. This short review intends to summarize the different aspects of product performance in fire testing relevant for product development and classification purposes.",
keywords = "fire retardant, fire testing, classification, polymers, end-use application",
author = "Esko Mikkola",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1002/1097-0126(200010)49:10<1222::AID-PI530>3.0.CO;2-5",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1222 -- 1225",
journal = "Polymer International",
issn = "0959-8103",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "10",

}

Fire retardants and product behaviour in fire tests. / Mikkola, Esko.

In: Polymer International, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2000, p. 1222 - 1225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fire retardants and product behaviour in fire tests

AU - Mikkola, Esko

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Fire safety aspects of polymeric materials in various types of use have led to finding effective ways to reduce the ease of ignition, flame spread and heat evolved as well as the amount of smoke, toxic and corrosive gases produced. Depending on the polymer and the end‐use application of the product, different fire‐retardant methods are used with the aim of passing criteria in fire tests related to the end‐use application. In most cases the classification criteria for reaction to fire behaviour are based on the assumption that early phase fire development is the main hazard. This means that the key elements for effective fire retardants are to delay ignition and to reduce heat release and smoke production, at least during the early part of exposure. This short review intends to summarize the different aspects of product performance in fire testing relevant for product development and classification purposes.

AB - Fire safety aspects of polymeric materials in various types of use have led to finding effective ways to reduce the ease of ignition, flame spread and heat evolved as well as the amount of smoke, toxic and corrosive gases produced. Depending on the polymer and the end‐use application of the product, different fire‐retardant methods are used with the aim of passing criteria in fire tests related to the end‐use application. In most cases the classification criteria for reaction to fire behaviour are based on the assumption that early phase fire development is the main hazard. This means that the key elements for effective fire retardants are to delay ignition and to reduce heat release and smoke production, at least during the early part of exposure. This short review intends to summarize the different aspects of product performance in fire testing relevant for product development and classification purposes.

KW - fire retardant

KW - fire testing

KW - classification

KW - polymers

KW - end-use application

U2 - 10.1002/1097-0126(200010)49:10<1222::AID-PI530>3.0.CO;2-5

DO - 10.1002/1097-0126(200010)49:10<1222::AID-PI530>3.0.CO;2-5

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1222

EP - 1225

JO - Polymer International

JF - Polymer International

SN - 0959-8103

IS - 10

ER -