Flow Dimension as an Indicator of Hydraulic Behaviour in Site Characterization of Fractured Rock

Kuusela-Lahtinen, Auli Niemi (Corresponding Author), Ari Luukkonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the possibility of using the flow dimension identified from constant pressure injection tests as a tool for characterizing the hydraulic conditions of fractured media. The data comes from a low‐conductivity crystalline rock site, from depths of up to 450 m, and is obtained with 2 m and 10 m measurement scales. In the analysis, the general solution for n‐dimensional flow by Barker (1988) is applied. The results show that the most prominent characteristics of the medium can be identified; that is, linear and sublinear flow dimensions as distinguished from dimensions higher than two. In many cases, however, there is significant difficulty in distinguishing the dimensions n = 2, 2.5, and 3 from each other. This is usually because of the experimental difficulties in achieving the ideal conditions required by the theory during the early part of the experiment. In such cases, a full flow curve is not available for the type‐curve fitting. In the nonunique cases the higher dimensions typically correspond to higher, sometimes unrealis‐tically high, values of specific storage and to the less reliable and less representative early part of the experiment. Therefore, most of the dimensions in categories n= 3 can be excluded, thus leaving the majority observations in the categories of n= 2 and n = 2–2.5. The dominance of dimension n = 2 is more pronounced for data related to fracture zones in comparison to that related to “average” rock, in particular in the 2 m scale data. The proportion of low (n < 1.5) flow dimensions is small, but for the 10 m scale data it is relatively higher at greater depths and corresponds to lower conductivities. For the smaller 2 m scale data, the low dimensions are not linked to greater depths or systematically smaller conductivities, giving preliminary indication of different flow dimension behavior for the two different scales.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-341
Number of pages9
JournalGround Water
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

site characterization
Rocks
Hydraulics
Crystalline rocks
hydraulics
rock
Experiments
conductivity
fractured medium
crystalline rock
fracture zone
indicator
experiment

Cite this

Kuusela-Lahtinen ; Niemi, Auli ; Luukkonen, Ari. / Flow Dimension as an Indicator of Hydraulic Behaviour in Site Characterization of Fractured Rock. In: Ground Water. 2003 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 333-341.
@article{85d8f9a8809b47669ec850cbc464fd43,
title = "Flow Dimension as an Indicator of Hydraulic Behaviour in Site Characterization of Fractured Rock",
abstract = "We examine the possibility of using the flow dimension identified from constant pressure injection tests as a tool for characterizing the hydraulic conditions of fractured media. The data comes from a low‐conductivity crystalline rock site, from depths of up to 450 m, and is obtained with 2 m and 10 m measurement scales. In the analysis, the general solution for n‐dimensional flow by Barker (1988) is applied. The results show that the most prominent characteristics of the medium can be identified; that is, linear and sublinear flow dimensions as distinguished from dimensions higher than two. In many cases, however, there is significant difficulty in distinguishing the dimensions n = 2, 2.5, and 3 from each other. This is usually because of the experimental difficulties in achieving the ideal conditions required by the theory during the early part of the experiment. In such cases, a full flow curve is not available for the type‐curve fitting. In the nonunique cases the higher dimensions typically correspond to higher, sometimes unrealis‐tically high, values of specific storage and to the less reliable and less representative early part of the experiment. Therefore, most of the dimensions in categories n= 3 can be excluded, thus leaving the majority observations in the categories of n= 2 and n = 2–2.5. The dominance of dimension n = 2 is more pronounced for data related to fracture zones in comparison to that related to “average” rock, in particular in the 2 m scale data. The proportion of low (n < 1.5) flow dimensions is small, but for the 10 m scale data it is relatively higher at greater depths and corresponds to lower conductivities. For the smaller 2 m scale data, the low dimensions are not linked to greater depths or systematically smaller conductivities, giving preliminary indication of different flow dimension behavior for the two different scales.",
author = "Kuusela-Lahtinen and Auli Niemi and Ari Luukkonen",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02602.x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "333--341",
journal = "Ground Water",
issn = "0017-467X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Flow Dimension as an Indicator of Hydraulic Behaviour in Site Characterization of Fractured Rock. / Kuusela-Lahtinen; Niemi, Auli (Corresponding Author); Luukkonen, Ari.

In: Ground Water, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2003, p. 333-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flow Dimension as an Indicator of Hydraulic Behaviour in Site Characterization of Fractured Rock

AU - Kuusela-Lahtinen, null

AU - Niemi, Auli

AU - Luukkonen, Ari

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - We examine the possibility of using the flow dimension identified from constant pressure injection tests as a tool for characterizing the hydraulic conditions of fractured media. The data comes from a low‐conductivity crystalline rock site, from depths of up to 450 m, and is obtained with 2 m and 10 m measurement scales. In the analysis, the general solution for n‐dimensional flow by Barker (1988) is applied. The results show that the most prominent characteristics of the medium can be identified; that is, linear and sublinear flow dimensions as distinguished from dimensions higher than two. In many cases, however, there is significant difficulty in distinguishing the dimensions n = 2, 2.5, and 3 from each other. This is usually because of the experimental difficulties in achieving the ideal conditions required by the theory during the early part of the experiment. In such cases, a full flow curve is not available for the type‐curve fitting. In the nonunique cases the higher dimensions typically correspond to higher, sometimes unrealis‐tically high, values of specific storage and to the less reliable and less representative early part of the experiment. Therefore, most of the dimensions in categories n= 3 can be excluded, thus leaving the majority observations in the categories of n= 2 and n = 2–2.5. The dominance of dimension n = 2 is more pronounced for data related to fracture zones in comparison to that related to “average” rock, in particular in the 2 m scale data. The proportion of low (n < 1.5) flow dimensions is small, but for the 10 m scale data it is relatively higher at greater depths and corresponds to lower conductivities. For the smaller 2 m scale data, the low dimensions are not linked to greater depths or systematically smaller conductivities, giving preliminary indication of different flow dimension behavior for the two different scales.

AB - We examine the possibility of using the flow dimension identified from constant pressure injection tests as a tool for characterizing the hydraulic conditions of fractured media. The data comes from a low‐conductivity crystalline rock site, from depths of up to 450 m, and is obtained with 2 m and 10 m measurement scales. In the analysis, the general solution for n‐dimensional flow by Barker (1988) is applied. The results show that the most prominent characteristics of the medium can be identified; that is, linear and sublinear flow dimensions as distinguished from dimensions higher than two. In many cases, however, there is significant difficulty in distinguishing the dimensions n = 2, 2.5, and 3 from each other. This is usually because of the experimental difficulties in achieving the ideal conditions required by the theory during the early part of the experiment. In such cases, a full flow curve is not available for the type‐curve fitting. In the nonunique cases the higher dimensions typically correspond to higher, sometimes unrealis‐tically high, values of specific storage and to the less reliable and less representative early part of the experiment. Therefore, most of the dimensions in categories n= 3 can be excluded, thus leaving the majority observations in the categories of n= 2 and n = 2–2.5. The dominance of dimension n = 2 is more pronounced for data related to fracture zones in comparison to that related to “average” rock, in particular in the 2 m scale data. The proportion of low (n < 1.5) flow dimensions is small, but for the 10 m scale data it is relatively higher at greater depths and corresponds to lower conductivities. For the smaller 2 m scale data, the low dimensions are not linked to greater depths or systematically smaller conductivities, giving preliminary indication of different flow dimension behavior for the two different scales.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02602.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02602.x

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 333

EP - 341

JO - Ground Water

JF - Ground Water

SN - 0017-467X

IS - 3

ER -