Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forest biomass retrieval approaches from earth observation in different biomes

  • Yrjö Rauste
  • , Pedro Rodríguez-Veiga*
  • , Shaun Quegan
  • , Joao Carreiras
  • , Henrik Persson
  • , Johan Fransson
  • , Agata Hoscilo
  • , Dariusz Zielkowski
  • , Krzysztof Sterenczak
  • , Sandra Lohenberger
  • , Matthias Stängel
  • , Anna Berninger
  • , Florian Siegert
  • , Valerio Avitabile
  • , Martin Herold
  • , Stéphane Mermoz
  • , Alexandre Bouvet
  • , Thuy Le Toan
  • , Nuno Carvalhais
  • , Maurizio Santoro
  • Oliver Cartus, Renaud Mathieu, Gregory Asner, Christian Thiel, Carsten Pathe, Chris Schmullius, Frank Martin Seifert, Kevin Tansey, Heiko Balzter
*Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Leicester
    • University of Sheffield
    • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    • Institute of Geodesy and Cartography (IGiK)
    • Forest Research Institute (IBL)
    • Remote Sensing Solutions GmbH (RSS)
    • Wageningen University & Research (WUR)
    • Centre D’Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphere (CESBIO)
    • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC)
    • GAMMA Remote Sensing and Consulting AG
    • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research South Africa
    • Carnegie Institution for Science
    • German Aerospace Center (DLR)
    • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
    • European Space Research Institute (ESRIN)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The amount and spatial distribution of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) were estimated using a range of regionally developed methods using Earth Observation data for Poland, Sweden and regions in Indonesia (Kalimantan), Mexico (Central Mexico and Yucatan peninsula), and South Africa (Eastern provinces) for the year 2010. These regions are representative of numerous forest biomes and biomass levels globally, from South African woodlands and savannas to the humid tropical forest of Kalimantan. AGB retrieval in each region relied on different sources of reference data, including forest inventory plot data and airborne LiDAR observations, and used a range of retrieval algorithms. This is the widest inter-comparison of regional-to-national AGB maps to date in terms of area, forest types, input datasets, and retrieval methods. The accuracy assessment of all regional maps using independent field data or LiDAR AGB maps resulted in an overall root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 10 t ha−1 to 55 t ha−1 (37% to 67% relative RMSE), and an overall bias ranging from −1 t ha−1 to +5 t ha−1 at pixel level. The regional maps showed better agreement with field data than previously developed and widely used pan-tropical or northern hemisphere datasets. The comparison of accuracy assessments showed commonalities in error structures despite the variety of methods, input data, and forest biomes. All regional retrievals resulted in overestimation (up to 63 t ha−1) in the lower AGB classes, and underestimation (up to 85 t ha−1) in the higher AGB classes. Parametric model-based algorithms present advantages due to their low demand on in situ data compared to non-parametric algorithms, but there is a need for datasets and retrieval methods that can overcome the biases at both ends of the AGB range. The outcomes of this study should be considered when developing algorithms to estimate forest biomass at continental to global scale level.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)53-68
    JournalInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
    Volume77
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2019
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Funding

    The authors would like to thank the following people and organizations for making the data freely available: JAXA, NASA, USGS, University of Maryland, ESKOM (South Africa), Southern Mapping Company (South Africa), CONAFOR (Mexico), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (Indonesia), Martin Thurner, Alessandro Baccini, and Sassan Saatchi. The GlobBiomass project was funded by the European Space Agency under its Data User Element - ITT AO/1-7822/14/I-NB. P. Rodriguez-Veiga, H. Balzter, J. Carreiras, and S. Quegan were supported by the UK’s National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO). H. Balzter was also supported by the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award, 2011/R3.

    Keywords

    • Remote sensing
    • biomass

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Forest biomass retrieval approaches from earth observation in different biomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this