Fractionation of bio-oil

Christian Lindfors, Eeva Kuoppala, Anja Oasmaa, Yrjö Solantausta, Vesa Arpiainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fuel properties of fast pyrolysis bio-oils differ significantly from those of fossil fuels. As transportation fuel, bio-oil is not suitable without upgrading because of its relatively low energy content, high water content, acidity, and poor storage stability. Upgrading of bio-oil has usually been done by treating the whole oil in a reactor. The problem with this treatment is that pyrolysis oil is a mixture of different compound groups, which all need different conditions and catalysts to react in a desirable way. Therefore, an efficient fractionation of bio-oil before upgrading may be a more efficient way of producing liquid fuels than treating the whole oil. In this work, the target was to compare two industrially relevant fractionation concepts. In the first concept, most of the water was removed during liquid recovery by adjusting the scrubber temperature. When the scrubber temperature was increased from 36 to 66 °C, the water content in the bio-oil decreased from 24 to 7 wt %. In the second concept, fast pyrolysis was carried out with wet feedstock. This would reduce the drying cost in the plant. By this means, a spontaneous phase separation was generated after liquid condensation. In the experiments, the moisture content of the raw material was increased up to 25 wt %, but even with this moisture content, the oily bottom phase still contained 22 wt % watersoluble compounds. However, if the target is to produce transportation fuels from bio-oil, fractionation by phase separation is a better concept for dividing the bio-oil into different compound groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5785-5791
Number of pages7
JournalEnergy & Fuels
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2014
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Fractionation
Oils
Pyrolysis
Scrubbers
Phase separation
Water content
Moisture
Liquid fuels
Liquids
Fossil fuels
Acidity
Feedstocks
Condensation
Drying
Raw materials
Recovery
Temperature
Catalysts
Water

Cite this

Lindfors, C., Kuoppala, E., Oasmaa, A., Solantausta, Y., & Arpiainen, V. (2014). Fractionation of bio-oil. Energy & Fuels, 28(9), 5785-5791. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500754d
Lindfors, Christian ; Kuoppala, Eeva ; Oasmaa, Anja ; Solantausta, Yrjö ; Arpiainen, Vesa. / Fractionation of bio-oil. In: Energy & Fuels. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 9. pp. 5785-5791.
@article{a991b395a4274cbd975ffeba2da94278,
title = "Fractionation of bio-oil",
abstract = "The fuel properties of fast pyrolysis bio-oils differ significantly from those of fossil fuels. As transportation fuel, bio-oil is not suitable without upgrading because of its relatively low energy content, high water content, acidity, and poor storage stability. Upgrading of bio-oil has usually been done by treating the whole oil in a reactor. The problem with this treatment is that pyrolysis oil is a mixture of different compound groups, which all need different conditions and catalysts to react in a desirable way. Therefore, an efficient fractionation of bio-oil before upgrading may be a more efficient way of producing liquid fuels than treating the whole oil. In this work, the target was to compare two industrially relevant fractionation concepts. In the first concept, most of the water was removed during liquid recovery by adjusting the scrubber temperature. When the scrubber temperature was increased from 36 to 66 °C, the water content in the bio-oil decreased from 24 to 7 wt {\%}. In the second concept, fast pyrolysis was carried out with wet feedstock. This would reduce the drying cost in the plant. By this means, a spontaneous phase separation was generated after liquid condensation. In the experiments, the moisture content of the raw material was increased up to 25 wt {\%}, but even with this moisture content, the oily bottom phase still contained 22 wt {\%} watersoluble compounds. However, if the target is to produce transportation fuels from bio-oil, fractionation by phase separation is a better concept for dividing the bio-oil into different compound groups.",
author = "Christian Lindfors and Eeva Kuoppala and Anja Oasmaa and Yrj{\"o} Solantausta and Vesa Arpiainen",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1021/ef500754d",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "5785--5791",
journal = "Energy & Fuels",
issn = "0887-0624",
publisher = "American Chemical Society ACS",
number = "9",

}

Lindfors, C, Kuoppala, E, Oasmaa, A, Solantausta, Y & Arpiainen, V 2014, 'Fractionation of bio-oil', Energy & Fuels, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 5785-5791. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500754d

Fractionation of bio-oil. / Lindfors, Christian; Kuoppala, Eeva; Oasmaa, Anja; Solantausta, Yrjö; Arpiainen, Vesa.

In: Energy & Fuels, Vol. 28, No. 9, 18.09.2014, p. 5785-5791.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fractionation of bio-oil

AU - Lindfors, Christian

AU - Kuoppala, Eeva

AU - Oasmaa, Anja

AU - Solantausta, Yrjö

AU - Arpiainen, Vesa

PY - 2014/9/18

Y1 - 2014/9/18

N2 - The fuel properties of fast pyrolysis bio-oils differ significantly from those of fossil fuels. As transportation fuel, bio-oil is not suitable without upgrading because of its relatively low energy content, high water content, acidity, and poor storage stability. Upgrading of bio-oil has usually been done by treating the whole oil in a reactor. The problem with this treatment is that pyrolysis oil is a mixture of different compound groups, which all need different conditions and catalysts to react in a desirable way. Therefore, an efficient fractionation of bio-oil before upgrading may be a more efficient way of producing liquid fuels than treating the whole oil. In this work, the target was to compare two industrially relevant fractionation concepts. In the first concept, most of the water was removed during liquid recovery by adjusting the scrubber temperature. When the scrubber temperature was increased from 36 to 66 °C, the water content in the bio-oil decreased from 24 to 7 wt %. In the second concept, fast pyrolysis was carried out with wet feedstock. This would reduce the drying cost in the plant. By this means, a spontaneous phase separation was generated after liquid condensation. In the experiments, the moisture content of the raw material was increased up to 25 wt %, but even with this moisture content, the oily bottom phase still contained 22 wt % watersoluble compounds. However, if the target is to produce transportation fuels from bio-oil, fractionation by phase separation is a better concept for dividing the bio-oil into different compound groups.

AB - The fuel properties of fast pyrolysis bio-oils differ significantly from those of fossil fuels. As transportation fuel, bio-oil is not suitable without upgrading because of its relatively low energy content, high water content, acidity, and poor storage stability. Upgrading of bio-oil has usually been done by treating the whole oil in a reactor. The problem with this treatment is that pyrolysis oil is a mixture of different compound groups, which all need different conditions and catalysts to react in a desirable way. Therefore, an efficient fractionation of bio-oil before upgrading may be a more efficient way of producing liquid fuels than treating the whole oil. In this work, the target was to compare two industrially relevant fractionation concepts. In the first concept, most of the water was removed during liquid recovery by adjusting the scrubber temperature. When the scrubber temperature was increased from 36 to 66 °C, the water content in the bio-oil decreased from 24 to 7 wt %. In the second concept, fast pyrolysis was carried out with wet feedstock. This would reduce the drying cost in the plant. By this means, a spontaneous phase separation was generated after liquid condensation. In the experiments, the moisture content of the raw material was increased up to 25 wt %, but even with this moisture content, the oily bottom phase still contained 22 wt % watersoluble compounds. However, if the target is to produce transportation fuels from bio-oil, fractionation by phase separation is a better concept for dividing the bio-oil into different compound groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949115811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ef500754d

DO - 10.1021/ef500754d

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 5785

EP - 5791

JO - Energy & Fuels

JF - Energy & Fuels

SN - 0887-0624

IS - 9

ER -

Lindfors C, Kuoppala E, Oasmaa A, Solantausta Y, Arpiainen V. Fractionation of bio-oil. Energy & Fuels. 2014 Sep 18;28(9):5785-5791. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500754d