From scenarios to dedisions: supporting decision making with exploratory and robust analysis

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    Abstract

    This report describes a case study that applies Robust Decision Making, RDM, a methodology that has recently been developed by RAND Corporation to support decision making under deep uncertainty. Robust decision is one that perform well over a wide range of future conditions. Deep uncertainty describes a common situation in which the parties to a decision don't know or cannot agree on probability distributions of key variables or models that relate the actions to consequences. When this situation prevails the traditional approach of striving for an agreement on assumptions as a first step of the decision making process may lead to a gridlock. That is why RDM uses agree-on-decisions approach. It inverts the classic decision making set-up: The analysis starts with existing plans or strategies and tests their performance in a multitude of futures covering all suggestions of the participating decision makers. The basic idea is that by using every participant's views in the analysis it may be possible to agree on a decision after carrying out the analysis even if the views on future conditions, model structure etc. differ. The approach is demonstrated by analysing nine alternative plans for the Finnish energy system. By giving a value range for the key variables a sample of 5000 plausible future conditions was defined. Every plan is tested in each of the future conditions. The most promising plans go through the vulnerability analysis. It is a statistical procedure to identify and present, in a concise way, those futures where the plans perform poorly. The discovery process not only identifies the factors but also reveals their value ranges which cause the poor performance. This range-information is essential in assessing the importance (likelihood) of the futures and in developing the plans to make them perform better in those specific circumstances, i.e., to make them more robust. Any model, especially existing ones, with decent running time can be used in the RDM process. In the RDM approach a model forms just one building block of the step-wise analysis process that uses a mixture of tools: the whole procedure is a modular one giving flexibility for carrying out the analysis focusing on points that are important for the problem at hand.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherTEKES
    Number of pages63
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

    Publication series

    SeriesNeo-Carbon Energy Working paper
    Volume5

    Fingerprint

    Scenarios
    Decision making
    Uncertainty
    Process analysis
    Probability distribution
    Robust decision making
    Factors
    Methodology
    Energy systems
    Decision-making process
    Vulnerability
    Decision maker

    Keywords

    • simulation
    • robust decision making
    • exploratory modelling

    Cite this

    @book{1ce95e4044da41c5ace290ae9013a63e,
    title = "From scenarios to dedisions: supporting decision making with exploratory and robust analysis",
    abstract = "This report describes a case study that applies Robust Decision Making, RDM, a methodology that has recently been developed by RAND Corporation to support decision making under deep uncertainty. Robust decision is one that perform well over a wide range of future conditions. Deep uncertainty describes a common situation in which the parties to a decision don't know or cannot agree on probability distributions of key variables or models that relate the actions to consequences. When this situation prevails the traditional approach of striving for an agreement on assumptions as a first step of the decision making process may lead to a gridlock. That is why RDM uses agree-on-decisions approach. It inverts the classic decision making set-up: The analysis starts with existing plans or strategies and tests their performance in a multitude of futures covering all suggestions of the participating decision makers. The basic idea is that by using every participant's views in the analysis it may be possible to agree on a decision after carrying out the analysis even if the views on future conditions, model structure etc. differ. The approach is demonstrated by analysing nine alternative plans for the Finnish energy system. By giving a value range for the key variables a sample of 5000 plausible future conditions was defined. Every plan is tested in each of the future conditions. The most promising plans go through the vulnerability analysis. It is a statistical procedure to identify and present, in a concise way, those futures where the plans perform poorly. The discovery process not only identifies the factors but also reveals their value ranges which cause the poor performance. This range-information is essential in assessing the importance (likelihood) of the futures and in developing the plans to make them perform better in those specific circumstances, i.e., to make them more robust. Any model, especially existing ones, with decent running time can be used in the RDM process. In the RDM approach a model forms just one building block of the step-wise analysis process that uses a mixture of tools: the whole procedure is a modular one giving flexibility for carrying out the analysis focusing on points that are important for the problem at hand.",
    keywords = "simulation, robust decision making, exploratory modelling",
    author = "Juha Forsstr{\"o}m",
    note = "Project code: 101283",
    year = "2016",
    language = "English",
    series = "Neo-Carbon Energy Working paper",
    publisher = "TEKES",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    From scenarios to dedisions : supporting decision making with exploratory and robust analysis. / Forsström, Juha.

    TEKES, 2016. 63 p. (Neo-Carbon Energy Working paper, Vol. 5).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - From scenarios to dedisions

    T2 - supporting decision making with exploratory and robust analysis

    AU - Forsström, Juha

    N1 - Project code: 101283

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This report describes a case study that applies Robust Decision Making, RDM, a methodology that has recently been developed by RAND Corporation to support decision making under deep uncertainty. Robust decision is one that perform well over a wide range of future conditions. Deep uncertainty describes a common situation in which the parties to a decision don't know or cannot agree on probability distributions of key variables or models that relate the actions to consequences. When this situation prevails the traditional approach of striving for an agreement on assumptions as a first step of the decision making process may lead to a gridlock. That is why RDM uses agree-on-decisions approach. It inverts the classic decision making set-up: The analysis starts with existing plans or strategies and tests their performance in a multitude of futures covering all suggestions of the participating decision makers. The basic idea is that by using every participant's views in the analysis it may be possible to agree on a decision after carrying out the analysis even if the views on future conditions, model structure etc. differ. The approach is demonstrated by analysing nine alternative plans for the Finnish energy system. By giving a value range for the key variables a sample of 5000 plausible future conditions was defined. Every plan is tested in each of the future conditions. The most promising plans go through the vulnerability analysis. It is a statistical procedure to identify and present, in a concise way, those futures where the plans perform poorly. The discovery process not only identifies the factors but also reveals their value ranges which cause the poor performance. This range-information is essential in assessing the importance (likelihood) of the futures and in developing the plans to make them perform better in those specific circumstances, i.e., to make them more robust. Any model, especially existing ones, with decent running time can be used in the RDM process. In the RDM approach a model forms just one building block of the step-wise analysis process that uses a mixture of tools: the whole procedure is a modular one giving flexibility for carrying out the analysis focusing on points that are important for the problem at hand.

    AB - This report describes a case study that applies Robust Decision Making, RDM, a methodology that has recently been developed by RAND Corporation to support decision making under deep uncertainty. Robust decision is one that perform well over a wide range of future conditions. Deep uncertainty describes a common situation in which the parties to a decision don't know or cannot agree on probability distributions of key variables or models that relate the actions to consequences. When this situation prevails the traditional approach of striving for an agreement on assumptions as a first step of the decision making process may lead to a gridlock. That is why RDM uses agree-on-decisions approach. It inverts the classic decision making set-up: The analysis starts with existing plans or strategies and tests their performance in a multitude of futures covering all suggestions of the participating decision makers. The basic idea is that by using every participant's views in the analysis it may be possible to agree on a decision after carrying out the analysis even if the views on future conditions, model structure etc. differ. The approach is demonstrated by analysing nine alternative plans for the Finnish energy system. By giving a value range for the key variables a sample of 5000 plausible future conditions was defined. Every plan is tested in each of the future conditions. The most promising plans go through the vulnerability analysis. It is a statistical procedure to identify and present, in a concise way, those futures where the plans perform poorly. The discovery process not only identifies the factors but also reveals their value ranges which cause the poor performance. This range-information is essential in assessing the importance (likelihood) of the futures and in developing the plans to make them perform better in those specific circumstances, i.e., to make them more robust. Any model, especially existing ones, with decent running time can be used in the RDM process. In the RDM approach a model forms just one building block of the step-wise analysis process that uses a mixture of tools: the whole procedure is a modular one giving flexibility for carrying out the analysis focusing on points that are important for the problem at hand.

    KW - simulation

    KW - robust decision making

    KW - exploratory modelling

    M3 - Report

    T3 - Neo-Carbon Energy Working paper

    BT - From scenarios to dedisions

    PB - TEKES

    ER -