Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    Abstract

    In 2009-2011, a comprehensive project on urban buses was carried out in cooperation with IEA's Implementing Agreements on Alternative Motor Fuels and Bioenergy, with input from additional IEA Implementing Agreements. The objective of the project was to generate unbiased and solid data for use by policy- and decision-makers responsible for public transport using buses. The project comprised four major parts: (1) a well-to-tank (WTT) assessment of alternative fuel pathways, (2) an assessment of bus end-use (tank-to-wheel, TTW) performance, (3) combining WTT and TTW data into well-to-wheel (WTW) data and (4) a cost assessment, including indirect as well as direct costs. Experts at Argonne National Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada and VTT worked on the WTT part. In the TTW part, Environment Canada and VTT generated emission and fuel consumption data by running 21 different buses on chassis dynamometers, generating data for some 180 combinations of vehicle, fuel and driving cycle. The fuels covered included diesel, synthetic diesel, various types of biodiesel fuels, additive treated ethanol, methane and DME. Six different hybrid vehicles were included in the vehicle matrix. The TTW work was topped up by on-road measurements (AVL MTC) as well as some engine dynamometer work (von Thünen Institute). Over the last 15 years, tightening emission regulations and improved engine and exhaust after-treatment technology have reduced regulated emissions by a factor of 10:1 and particulate numbers with a factor of 100:1. Hybridization or light-weighting reduce fuel consumption 20-30%, but otherwise the improvements in fuel efficiency have not been that spectacular. The driving cycle affects regulated emissions and fuel consumption by a factor of 5:1. The fuel effects are at maximum 2.5:1 for regulated emissions (particulates), but as high as 100:1 for WTW greenhouse emissions. WTW energy use varies by a factor on 2.5:1.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationEspoo
    PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
    Number of pages402
    ISBN (Electronic)978-951-38-7869-6
    ISBN (Print)978-951-38-7868-9
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Publication series

    SeriesVTT Technology
    Number46
    ISSN2242-1211

    Fingerprint

    Energy efficiency
    Wheels
    Fuel consumption
    Dynamometers
    Engines
    Fuel additives
    Particulate emissions
    Alternative fuels
    Chassis
    Greenhouses
    Hybrid vehicles
    Natural resources
    Biodiesel
    Costs
    Methane
    Ethanol

    Keywords

    • urban buses
    • energy consumption
    • greenhouse gas emissions
    • exhaust emissions
    • costs
    • alternative fuels
    • WTT
    • TTW
    • WTW

    Cite this

    Nylund, N-O., & Koponen, K. (2012). Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Technology, No. 46
    Nylund, Nils-Olof ; Koponen, Kati. / Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses : Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2012. 402 p. (VTT Technology; No. 46).
    @book{42e92ac548c24dbdb19a42f2cc3e1875,
    title = "Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance",
    abstract = "In 2009-2011, a comprehensive project on urban buses was carried out in cooperation with IEA's Implementing Agreements on Alternative Motor Fuels and Bioenergy, with input from additional IEA Implementing Agreements. The objective of the project was to generate unbiased and solid data for use by policy- and decision-makers responsible for public transport using buses. The project comprised four major parts: (1) a well-to-tank (WTT) assessment of alternative fuel pathways, (2) an assessment of bus end-use (tank-to-wheel, TTW) performance, (3) combining WTT and TTW data into well-to-wheel (WTW) data and (4) a cost assessment, including indirect as well as direct costs. Experts at Argonne National Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada and VTT worked on the WTT part. In the TTW part, Environment Canada and VTT generated emission and fuel consumption data by running 21 different buses on chassis dynamometers, generating data for some 180 combinations of vehicle, fuel and driving cycle. The fuels covered included diesel, synthetic diesel, various types of biodiesel fuels, additive treated ethanol, methane and DME. Six different hybrid vehicles were included in the vehicle matrix. The TTW work was topped up by on-road measurements (AVL MTC) as well as some engine dynamometer work (von Th{\"u}nen Institute). Over the last 15 years, tightening emission regulations and improved engine and exhaust after-treatment technology have reduced regulated emissions by a factor of 10:1 and particulate numbers with a factor of 100:1. Hybridization or light-weighting reduce fuel consumption 20-30{\%}, but otherwise the improvements in fuel efficiency have not been that spectacular. The driving cycle affects regulated emissions and fuel consumption by a factor of 5:1. The fuel effects are at maximum 2.5:1 for regulated emissions (particulates), but as high as 100:1 for WTW greenhouse emissions. WTW energy use varies by a factor on 2.5:1.",
    keywords = "urban buses, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, exhaust emissions, costs, alternative fuels, WTT, TTW, WTW",
    author = "Nils-Olof Nylund and Kati Koponen",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-951-38-7868-9",
    series = "VTT Technology",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "46",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    Nylund, N-O & Koponen, K 2012, Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance. VTT Technology, no. 46, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

    Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses : Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance. / Nylund, Nils-Olof; Koponen, Kati.

    Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2012. 402 p. (VTT Technology; No. 46).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses

    T2 - Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance

    AU - Nylund, Nils-Olof

    AU - Koponen, Kati

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - In 2009-2011, a comprehensive project on urban buses was carried out in cooperation with IEA's Implementing Agreements on Alternative Motor Fuels and Bioenergy, with input from additional IEA Implementing Agreements. The objective of the project was to generate unbiased and solid data for use by policy- and decision-makers responsible for public transport using buses. The project comprised four major parts: (1) a well-to-tank (WTT) assessment of alternative fuel pathways, (2) an assessment of bus end-use (tank-to-wheel, TTW) performance, (3) combining WTT and TTW data into well-to-wheel (WTW) data and (4) a cost assessment, including indirect as well as direct costs. Experts at Argonne National Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada and VTT worked on the WTT part. In the TTW part, Environment Canada and VTT generated emission and fuel consumption data by running 21 different buses on chassis dynamometers, generating data for some 180 combinations of vehicle, fuel and driving cycle. The fuels covered included diesel, synthetic diesel, various types of biodiesel fuels, additive treated ethanol, methane and DME. Six different hybrid vehicles were included in the vehicle matrix. The TTW work was topped up by on-road measurements (AVL MTC) as well as some engine dynamometer work (von Thünen Institute). Over the last 15 years, tightening emission regulations and improved engine and exhaust after-treatment technology have reduced regulated emissions by a factor of 10:1 and particulate numbers with a factor of 100:1. Hybridization or light-weighting reduce fuel consumption 20-30%, but otherwise the improvements in fuel efficiency have not been that spectacular. The driving cycle affects regulated emissions and fuel consumption by a factor of 5:1. The fuel effects are at maximum 2.5:1 for regulated emissions (particulates), but as high as 100:1 for WTW greenhouse emissions. WTW energy use varies by a factor on 2.5:1.

    AB - In 2009-2011, a comprehensive project on urban buses was carried out in cooperation with IEA's Implementing Agreements on Alternative Motor Fuels and Bioenergy, with input from additional IEA Implementing Agreements. The objective of the project was to generate unbiased and solid data for use by policy- and decision-makers responsible for public transport using buses. The project comprised four major parts: (1) a well-to-tank (WTT) assessment of alternative fuel pathways, (2) an assessment of bus end-use (tank-to-wheel, TTW) performance, (3) combining WTT and TTW data into well-to-wheel (WTW) data and (4) a cost assessment, including indirect as well as direct costs. Experts at Argonne National Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada and VTT worked on the WTT part. In the TTW part, Environment Canada and VTT generated emission and fuel consumption data by running 21 different buses on chassis dynamometers, generating data for some 180 combinations of vehicle, fuel and driving cycle. The fuels covered included diesel, synthetic diesel, various types of biodiesel fuels, additive treated ethanol, methane and DME. Six different hybrid vehicles were included in the vehicle matrix. The TTW work was topped up by on-road measurements (AVL MTC) as well as some engine dynamometer work (von Thünen Institute). Over the last 15 years, tightening emission regulations and improved engine and exhaust after-treatment technology have reduced regulated emissions by a factor of 10:1 and particulate numbers with a factor of 100:1. Hybridization or light-weighting reduce fuel consumption 20-30%, but otherwise the improvements in fuel efficiency have not been that spectacular. The driving cycle affects regulated emissions and fuel consumption by a factor of 5:1. The fuel effects are at maximum 2.5:1 for regulated emissions (particulates), but as high as 100:1 for WTW greenhouse emissions. WTW energy use varies by a factor on 2.5:1.

    KW - urban buses

    KW - energy consumption

    KW - greenhouse gas emissions

    KW - exhaust emissions

    KW - costs

    KW - alternative fuels

    KW - WTT

    KW - TTW

    KW - WTW

    M3 - Report

    SN - 978-951-38-7868-9

    T3 - VTT Technology

    BT - Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    CY - Espoo

    ER -

    Nylund N-O, Koponen K. Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2012. 402 p. (VTT Technology; No. 46).