Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices

T. Loarer, C. Brosset, J. Bucalossi, P. Coad, G. Esser, J. Hogan, Jari Likonen, M. Mayer, Ph. Morgan, V. Philipps, V. Rohde, J. Roth, M. Rubel, E. Tsitrone, A. Widdowson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The evaluation of hydrogenic retention in present tokamaks is of crucial importance to estimate the expected tritium (T) vessel inventory in ITER, limited from safety considerations to 350 g. In the framework of the European Task Force on Plasma Wall Interaction (EU TF on PWI) efforts are underway to investigate gas balance and fuel retention during discharges, and to compare the data obtained with those from post-mortem analysis of in-vessel components exposed over whole experimental campaigns. This paper summarizes the principal findings from coordinated studies on gas balance and fuel retention from a number of European tokamaks, namely, ASDEX-Upgrade (AUG), JET, TEXTOR and Tore Supra (TS). For most devices, the long-term retention fraction deduced from integrated particle balance is ~10–20%. This is larger than the ~3–4% deduced from post-mortem analysis of plasma facing components (PFCs). However, from the database available for tokamaks with their main PFCs made of carbon, the important conclusion is that the T inventory limit (set by the working guideline for operations) could be reached in ITER within fewer than 100 discharges. This, therefore, would seriously impact on operation of the device unless efficient T removal processes are developed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1112-1120
    JournalNuclear Fusion
    Volume47
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    fusion
    gases
    vessels
    tritium
    safety
    evaluation
    carbon
    estimates
    interactions

    Keywords

    • fusion energy
    • fusion reactors
    • plasma
    • plasma-wall interactions
    • ITER
    • JET
    • tokamak
    • tritium
    • tritium retention

    Cite this

    Loarer, T., Brosset, C., Bucalossi, J., Coad, P., Esser, G., Hogan, J., ... Widdowson, A. (2007). Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices. Nuclear Fusion, 47(9), 1112-1120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007
    Loarer, T. ; Brosset, C. ; Bucalossi, J. ; Coad, P. ; Esser, G. ; Hogan, J. ; Likonen, Jari ; Mayer, M. ; Morgan, Ph. ; Philipps, V. ; Rohde, V. ; Roth, J. ; Rubel, M. ; Tsitrone, E. ; Widdowson, A. / Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices. In: Nuclear Fusion. 2007 ; Vol. 47, No. 9. pp. 1112-1120.
    @article{baaec0f8a9c94fab865430ca9ee4116a,
    title = "Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices",
    abstract = "The evaluation of hydrogenic retention in present tokamaks is of crucial importance to estimate the expected tritium (T) vessel inventory in ITER, limited from safety considerations to 350 g. In the framework of the European Task Force on Plasma Wall Interaction (EU TF on PWI) efforts are underway to investigate gas balance and fuel retention during discharges, and to compare the data obtained with those from post-mortem analysis of in-vessel components exposed over whole experimental campaigns. This paper summarizes the principal findings from coordinated studies on gas balance and fuel retention from a number of European tokamaks, namely, ASDEX-Upgrade (AUG), JET, TEXTOR and Tore Supra (TS). For most devices, the long-term retention fraction deduced from integrated particle balance is ~10–20{\%}. This is larger than the ~3–4{\%} deduced from post-mortem analysis of plasma facing components (PFCs). However, from the database available for tokamaks with their main PFCs made of carbon, the important conclusion is that the T inventory limit (set by the working guideline for operations) could be reached in ITER within fewer than 100 discharges. This, therefore, would seriously impact on operation of the device unless efficient T removal processes are developed.",
    keywords = "fusion energy, fusion reactors, plasma, plasma-wall interactions, ITER, JET, tokamak, tritium, tritium retention",
    author = "T. Loarer and C. Brosset and J. Bucalossi and P. Coad and G. Esser and J. Hogan and Jari Likonen and M. Mayer and Ph. Morgan and V. Philipps and V. Rohde and J. Roth and M. Rubel and E. Tsitrone and A. Widdowson",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "1112--1120",
    journal = "Nuclear Fusion",
    issn = "0029-5515",
    publisher = "Institute of Physics IOP",
    number = "9",

    }

    Loarer, T, Brosset, C, Bucalossi, J, Coad, P, Esser, G, Hogan, J, Likonen, J, Mayer, M, Morgan, P, Philipps, V, Rohde, V, Roth, J, Rubel, M, Tsitrone, E & Widdowson, A 2007, 'Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices', Nuclear Fusion, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1112-1120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007

    Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices. / Loarer, T.; Brosset, C.; Bucalossi, J.; Coad, P.; Esser, G.; Hogan, J.; Likonen, Jari; Mayer, M.; Morgan, Ph.; Philipps, V.; Rohde, V.; Roth, J.; Rubel, M.; Tsitrone, E.; Widdowson, A.

    In: Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 47, No. 9, 2007, p. 1112-1120.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices

    AU - Loarer, T.

    AU - Brosset, C.

    AU - Bucalossi, J.

    AU - Coad, P.

    AU - Esser, G.

    AU - Hogan, J.

    AU - Likonen, Jari

    AU - Mayer, M.

    AU - Morgan, Ph.

    AU - Philipps, V.

    AU - Rohde, V.

    AU - Roth, J.

    AU - Rubel, M.

    AU - Tsitrone, E.

    AU - Widdowson, A.

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - The evaluation of hydrogenic retention in present tokamaks is of crucial importance to estimate the expected tritium (T) vessel inventory in ITER, limited from safety considerations to 350 g. In the framework of the European Task Force on Plasma Wall Interaction (EU TF on PWI) efforts are underway to investigate gas balance and fuel retention during discharges, and to compare the data obtained with those from post-mortem analysis of in-vessel components exposed over whole experimental campaigns. This paper summarizes the principal findings from coordinated studies on gas balance and fuel retention from a number of European tokamaks, namely, ASDEX-Upgrade (AUG), JET, TEXTOR and Tore Supra (TS). For most devices, the long-term retention fraction deduced from integrated particle balance is ~10–20%. This is larger than the ~3–4% deduced from post-mortem analysis of plasma facing components (PFCs). However, from the database available for tokamaks with their main PFCs made of carbon, the important conclusion is that the T inventory limit (set by the working guideline for operations) could be reached in ITER within fewer than 100 discharges. This, therefore, would seriously impact on operation of the device unless efficient T removal processes are developed.

    AB - The evaluation of hydrogenic retention in present tokamaks is of crucial importance to estimate the expected tritium (T) vessel inventory in ITER, limited from safety considerations to 350 g. In the framework of the European Task Force on Plasma Wall Interaction (EU TF on PWI) efforts are underway to investigate gas balance and fuel retention during discharges, and to compare the data obtained with those from post-mortem analysis of in-vessel components exposed over whole experimental campaigns. This paper summarizes the principal findings from coordinated studies on gas balance and fuel retention from a number of European tokamaks, namely, ASDEX-Upgrade (AUG), JET, TEXTOR and Tore Supra (TS). For most devices, the long-term retention fraction deduced from integrated particle balance is ~10–20%. This is larger than the ~3–4% deduced from post-mortem analysis of plasma facing components (PFCs). However, from the database available for tokamaks with their main PFCs made of carbon, the important conclusion is that the T inventory limit (set by the working guideline for operations) could be reached in ITER within fewer than 100 discharges. This, therefore, would seriously impact on operation of the device unless efficient T removal processes are developed.

    KW - fusion energy

    KW - fusion reactors

    KW - plasma

    KW - plasma-wall interactions

    KW - ITER

    KW - JET

    KW - tokamak

    KW - tritium

    KW - tritium retention

    U2 - 10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007

    DO - 10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 1112

    EP - 1120

    JO - Nuclear Fusion

    JF - Nuclear Fusion

    SN - 0029-5515

    IS - 9

    ER -

    Loarer T, Brosset C, Bucalossi J, Coad P, Esser G, Hogan J et al. Gas balance and fuel retention in fusion devices. Nuclear Fusion. 2007;47(9):1112-1120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007