Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods

Anna Matala, C. Lautenberger, Simo Hostikka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Solid-phase pyrolysis is often modelled using the Arrhenius degradation equation with three unknown parameters: reaction order, activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Since the parameters are model dependent and not directly measurable, several estimation methods have been developed over the years for extracting them from the experimental small-scale data. Lately, the most commonly used methods have been based on optimization and curve fitting. These methods are very efficient for complex problems with multiple reactions but may require significant computational time. Direct (analytic) methods are simpler and faster but often have more restrictions and limited accuracy. This article presents a new, generalized direct method and its performance evaluated along with other commonly used estimation methods. The real usability of the methods is tested also in the presence of small noise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-356
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Fire Sciences
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Kinetic parameters
Parameter estimation
Pyrolysis
Curve fitting
Activation energy
Degradation

Keywords

  • pyrolysis
  • modelling
  • parameter estimation

Cite this

Matala, Anna ; Lautenberger, C. ; Hostikka, Simo. / Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods. In: Journal of Fire Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 339-356.
@article{0b6da368e8654f70a7cb1d4c393a942d,
title = "Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods",
abstract = "Solid-phase pyrolysis is often modelled using the Arrhenius degradation equation with three unknown parameters: reaction order, activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Since the parameters are model dependent and not directly measurable, several estimation methods have been developed over the years for extracting them from the experimental small-scale data. Lately, the most commonly used methods have been based on optimization and curve fitting. These methods are very efficient for complex problems with multiple reactions but may require significant computational time. Direct (analytic) methods are simpler and faster but often have more restrictions and limited accuracy. This article presents a new, generalized direct method and its performance evaluated along with other commonly used estimation methods. The real usability of the methods is tested also in the presence of small noise.",
keywords = "pyrolysis, modelling, parameter estimation",
author = "Anna Matala and C. Lautenberger and Simo Hostikka",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/0734904112439840",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "339--356",
journal = "Journal of Fire Sciences",
issn = "0734-9041",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods. / Matala, Anna; Lautenberger, C.; Hostikka, Simo.

In: Journal of Fire Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2012, p. 339-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods

AU - Matala, Anna

AU - Lautenberger, C.

AU - Hostikka, Simo

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Solid-phase pyrolysis is often modelled using the Arrhenius degradation equation with three unknown parameters: reaction order, activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Since the parameters are model dependent and not directly measurable, several estimation methods have been developed over the years for extracting them from the experimental small-scale data. Lately, the most commonly used methods have been based on optimization and curve fitting. These methods are very efficient for complex problems with multiple reactions but may require significant computational time. Direct (analytic) methods are simpler and faster but often have more restrictions and limited accuracy. This article presents a new, generalized direct method and its performance evaluated along with other commonly used estimation methods. The real usability of the methods is tested also in the presence of small noise.

AB - Solid-phase pyrolysis is often modelled using the Arrhenius degradation equation with three unknown parameters: reaction order, activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Since the parameters are model dependent and not directly measurable, several estimation methods have been developed over the years for extracting them from the experimental small-scale data. Lately, the most commonly used methods have been based on optimization and curve fitting. These methods are very efficient for complex problems with multiple reactions but may require significant computational time. Direct (analytic) methods are simpler and faster but often have more restrictions and limited accuracy. This article presents a new, generalized direct method and its performance evaluated along with other commonly used estimation methods. The real usability of the methods is tested also in the presence of small noise.

KW - pyrolysis

KW - modelling

KW - parameter estimation

U2 - 10.1177/0734904112439840

DO - 10.1177/0734904112439840

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 339

EP - 356

JO - Journal of Fire Sciences

JF - Journal of Fire Sciences

SN - 0734-9041

IS - 4

ER -