Getting real about BIM: Critical realist descriptions as an alternative to the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype

Stephen Fox (Corresponding Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose – For some years, it has been claimed that Building Information Modelling (BIM) will bring about major improvements to the productivity of the building industry. Yet, productivity has declined while claims for BIM have expanded. Often, BIM descriptions comprise the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. The purpose of this paper is to present critical realist descriptions and explain their advantages compared to BIM hype descriptions. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal critical realist case study of BIM causal mechanism and causal context. Findings – Critical realist analysis reveals that hype about BIM underplays many inter-related causal requirements: all of which are needed to bring project business outcome from management action. Practical implications – Many inter-related non-trivial causal factors need to be taken into account to achieve business outcome from BIM implementation action. Further, factors claimed at the outset to be adequate to achieve outcome from action may be less than adequate. Originality/value – The originality of this paper is that critical realism analysis across six years is presented. This longitudinal data reveals that claims for BIM can be more future goals than current certainties. The value of this paper is that detailed analysis of hype descriptions is provided alongside critical realist descriptions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)405-422
    Number of pages17
    JournalInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Information modeling
    Productivity
    Business outcomes
    Factors
    Project business
    Design methodology
    Industry
    Longitudinal data
    Critical realism

    Keywords

    • critical realism
    • framing
    • BIM
    • technology management
    • hype
    • fallacy

    Cite this

    @article{d820c4ed64264e63ae75ad665e198fbc,
    title = "Getting real about BIM: Critical realist descriptions as an alternative to the na{\"i}ve framing and multiple fallacies of hype",
    abstract = "Purpose – For some years, it has been claimed that Building Information Modelling (BIM) will bring about major improvements to the productivity of the building industry. Yet, productivity has declined while claims for BIM have expanded. Often, BIM descriptions comprise the na{\"i}ve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. The purpose of this paper is to present critical realist descriptions and explain their advantages compared to BIM hype descriptions. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal critical realist case study of BIM causal mechanism and causal context. Findings – Critical realist analysis reveals that hype about BIM underplays many inter-related causal requirements: all of which are needed to bring project business outcome from management action. Practical implications – Many inter-related non-trivial causal factors need to be taken into account to achieve business outcome from BIM implementation action. Further, factors claimed at the outset to be adequate to achieve outcome from action may be less than adequate. Originality/value – The originality of this paper is that critical realism analysis across six years is presented. This longitudinal data reveals that claims for BIM can be more future goals than current certainties. The value of this paper is that detailed analysis of hype descriptions is provided alongside critical realist descriptions.",
    keywords = "critical realism, framing, BIM, technology management, hype, fallacy",
    author = "Stephen Fox",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1108/IJMPB-12-2013-0073",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "405--422",
    journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
    issn = "1753-8378",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Getting real about BIM

    T2 - Critical realist descriptions as an alternative to the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype

    AU - Fox, Stephen

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Purpose – For some years, it has been claimed that Building Information Modelling (BIM) will bring about major improvements to the productivity of the building industry. Yet, productivity has declined while claims for BIM have expanded. Often, BIM descriptions comprise the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. The purpose of this paper is to present critical realist descriptions and explain their advantages compared to BIM hype descriptions. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal critical realist case study of BIM causal mechanism and causal context. Findings – Critical realist analysis reveals that hype about BIM underplays many inter-related causal requirements: all of which are needed to bring project business outcome from management action. Practical implications – Many inter-related non-trivial causal factors need to be taken into account to achieve business outcome from BIM implementation action. Further, factors claimed at the outset to be adequate to achieve outcome from action may be less than adequate. Originality/value – The originality of this paper is that critical realism analysis across six years is presented. This longitudinal data reveals that claims for BIM can be more future goals than current certainties. The value of this paper is that detailed analysis of hype descriptions is provided alongside critical realist descriptions.

    AB - Purpose – For some years, it has been claimed that Building Information Modelling (BIM) will bring about major improvements to the productivity of the building industry. Yet, productivity has declined while claims for BIM have expanded. Often, BIM descriptions comprise the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. The purpose of this paper is to present critical realist descriptions and explain their advantages compared to BIM hype descriptions. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal critical realist case study of BIM causal mechanism and causal context. Findings – Critical realist analysis reveals that hype about BIM underplays many inter-related causal requirements: all of which are needed to bring project business outcome from management action. Practical implications – Many inter-related non-trivial causal factors need to be taken into account to achieve business outcome from BIM implementation action. Further, factors claimed at the outset to be adequate to achieve outcome from action may be less than adequate. Originality/value – The originality of this paper is that critical realism analysis across six years is presented. This longitudinal data reveals that claims for BIM can be more future goals than current certainties. The value of this paper is that detailed analysis of hype descriptions is provided alongside critical realist descriptions.

    KW - critical realism

    KW - framing

    KW - BIM

    KW - technology management

    KW - hype

    KW - fallacy

    U2 - 10.1108/IJMPB-12-2013-0073

    DO - 10.1108/IJMPB-12-2013-0073

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 405

    EP - 422

    JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

    JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

    SN - 1753-8378

    IS - 3

    ER -