Getting real about innovations

Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.

Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.
Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.

Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.

Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-104
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Innovation
Uncertainty
Unintended consequences
Design methodology
Stakeholders
Critical realism
Diagrams
World view

Keywords

  • Augmented reality
  • critical realism
  • individual perception
  • innovation
  • innovation hype
  • manual skills training
  • negative unintended consequences
  • ontological uncertainly
  • reliability
  • skills training

Cite this

@article{1a36ed76a05c493789a4132d39ba3764,
title = "Getting real about innovations: Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.",
keywords = "Augmented reality, critical realism, individual perception, innovation, innovation hype, manual skills training, negative unintended consequences, ontological uncertainly, reliability, skills training",
author = "Stephen Fox",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/17538371211192919",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "86--104",
journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
issn = "1753-8378",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Getting real about innovations : Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty. / Fox, Stephen.

In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, p. 86-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting real about innovations

T2 - Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty

AU - Fox, Stephen

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.

KW - Augmented reality

KW - critical realism

KW - individual perception

KW - innovation

KW - innovation hype

KW - manual skills training

KW - negative unintended consequences

KW - ontological uncertainly

KW - reliability

KW - skills training

U2 - 10.1108/17538371211192919

DO - 10.1108/17538371211192919

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 86

EP - 104

JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

SN - 1753-8378

IS - 1

ER -