Getting real about innovations: Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.

    Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.
    Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.

    Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.

    Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)86-104
    Number of pages19
    JournalInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Innovation
    Uncertainty
    Unintended consequences
    Design methodology
    Stakeholders
    Critical realism
    Diagrams
    World view

    Keywords

    • Augmented reality
    • critical realism
    • individual perception
    • innovation
    • innovation hype
    • manual skills training
    • negative unintended consequences
    • ontological uncertainly
    • reliability
    • skills training

    Cite this

    @article{1a36ed76a05c493789a4132d39ba3764,
    title = "Getting real about innovations: Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty",
    abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.",
    keywords = "Augmented reality, critical realism, individual perception, innovation, innovation hype, manual skills training, negative unintended consequences, ontological uncertainly, reliability, skills training",
    author = "Stephen Fox",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1108/17538371211192919",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "86--104",
    journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
    issn = "1753-8378",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "1",

    }

    Getting real about innovations : Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty. / Fox, Stephen.

    In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, p. 86-104.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Getting real about innovations

    T2 - Formulating innovation descriptions that can reduce ontological uncertainty

    AU - Fox, Stephen

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.

    AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how descriptions of innovations can be formulated in order to reduce the potential for ontological uncertainty. Ontological uncertainty exists when individuals have perceptions about the future consequences of an innovation, which are based more on their diverse world views than on the innovation itself.Design/methodology/approach – The research comprised unstructured interviews and review of the literature relating to innovation hype, innovation reliability, innovation negative unintended consequences, and critical realism.Findings – Critical realist diagrams provide the basis for descriptions that can encompass an innovation's purpose; the functions and conditions which are necessary for its reliable operation; and also potential negative unintended consequences that might arise from the innovation.Practical implications – There can be much hype and little clarity surrounding an innovation. This can make it easier for different stakeholders to have different perceptions of the same innovation. By increasing the clarity of descriptions, there can be less uncertainty about the purpose, reliability, and consequences of an innovation.Originality/value – The originality of the paper is that provides example innovation descriptions which illustrate how hype can be decreased and clarity can be increased. The value of this paper is that supports reduction of ontological uncertainty in practice.

    KW - Augmented reality

    KW - critical realism

    KW - individual perception

    KW - innovation

    KW - innovation hype

    KW - manual skills training

    KW - negative unintended consequences

    KW - ontological uncertainly

    KW - reliability

    KW - skills training

    U2 - 10.1108/17538371211192919

    DO - 10.1108/17538371211192919

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 86

    EP - 104

    JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

    JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

    SN - 1753-8378

    IS - 1

    ER -