Glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 are not specific biomarkers for mild CT-negative traumatic brain injury

  • Jussi P. Posti*
  • , Iftakher Hossain
  • , Riikka S.K. Takala
  • , Hilkka Liedes
  • , Virginia Newcombe
  • , Joanne Outtrim
  • , Ari J. Katila
  • , Janek Frantzén
  • , Henna Ala-Seppälä
  • , Jonathan P. Coles
  • , Anna Kyllönen
  • , Henna-Riikka Maanpää
  • , Jussi Tallus
  • , Peter J. Hutchinson
  • , Mark van Gils
  • , David K. Menon
  • , Olli Tenovuo
  • , TBI Care Investigators
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    70 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) have been studied as potential biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We report the levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in patients with acute orthopedic injuries without central nervous system involvement, and relate them to the type of extracranial injury, head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in patients with CT-negative mTBI. Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP were longitudinally measured from 73 patients with acute orthopedic injury on arrival and on days 1, 2, 3, 7 after admission, and on the follow-up visit 3-10 months after the injury. The injury types were recorded, and 71% patients underwent also head MRI. The results were compared with those found in patients with CT-negative mTBI (n = 93). The levels of GFAP were higher in patients with acute orthopedic trauma than in patients with CT-negative mTBI (p = 0.026) on arrival; however, no differences were found on the following days. The levels of UCH-L1 were not significantly different between these two groups at any measured point of time. Levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 were not able to distinguish patients with CT-negative mTBI from patients with orthopedic trauma. Patients with orthopedic trauma and high levels of UCH-L1 or GFAP values may be falsely diagnosed as having a concomitant mTBI, predisposing them to unwarranted diagnostics and unnecessary brain imaging. This casts a significant doubt on the diagnostic value of GFAP and UCH-L1 in cases with mTBI.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1427-1438
    JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
    Volume34
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    This work was partially funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (FP7-270259-TBIcare), personal Government's Special Financial Transfer tied to academic research in Health Sciences ( J.P.P. and R.S.K.T.), personal EVO funding and grant from Maire Taponen Foundation ( J.P.P.), Health Foundation/Academy of Medical Sciences Clinician Scientist Fellowship (V.N.), National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Fellowship (P.J.H.).

    Keywords

    • biomarker
    • GFAP
    • orthopedic injury
    • TBI
    • UCH-L1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 are not specific biomarkers for mild CT-negative traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this