Good intentions with limited outcomes: Three limitations of trying to reduce mass migration with industrial thinking

Stephen Fox, Idriss El-Thalji, Safwan Altarazi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Industrial thinking is being applied in efforts to try to stem the flow of migrants to Europe. In particular, industrial production in the Middle East is being subsidized by the European Union. This is being done with good intentions. However, positive outcomes are limited. In this paper, it is explained that limited positive outcomes are inevitable, because industrial thinking is too out-of-date and out-of-place to address the causes of mass migration in the Middle East. By contrast, "leapfrog" socio-technical systems could be applied to address the complex causes of mass migration, not as socio-economic crises, but as opportunities for mutual prosperity growth.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-32
    Number of pages2
    JournalTechnology in Society
    Volume50
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Middle East
    migration
    Economics
    industrial production
    cause
    prosperity
    economic crisis
    migrant
    European Union
    Socio-technical systems
    Socio-economics
    Migrants
    Prosperity
    Economic crisis
    Industrial production

    Keywords

    • industrialization
    • leapfrog
    • mass migration
    • middle east
    • prosperity
    • socio-technical system

    Cite this

    @article{9b58a97e378349a28eb9d6062d2d42dd,
    title = "Good intentions with limited outcomes: Three limitations of trying to reduce mass migration with industrial thinking",
    abstract = "Industrial thinking is being applied in efforts to try to stem the flow of migrants to Europe. In particular, industrial production in the Middle East is being subsidized by the European Union. This is being done with good intentions. However, positive outcomes are limited. In this paper, it is explained that limited positive outcomes are inevitable, because industrial thinking is too out-of-date and out-of-place to address the causes of mass migration in the Middle East. By contrast, {"}leapfrog{"} socio-technical systems could be applied to address the complex causes of mass migration, not as socio-economic crises, but as opportunities for mutual prosperity growth.",
    keywords = "industrialization, leapfrog, mass migration, middle east, prosperity, socio-technical system",
    author = "Stephen Fox and Idriss El-Thalji and Safwan Altarazi",
    year = "2017",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "31--32",
    journal = "Technology in Society",
    issn = "0160-791X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Good intentions with limited outcomes: Three limitations of trying to reduce mass migration with industrial thinking. / Fox, Stephen; El-Thalji, Idriss; Altarazi, Safwan.

    In: Technology in Society, Vol. 50, 01.08.2017, p. 31-32.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Good intentions with limited outcomes: Three limitations of trying to reduce mass migration with industrial thinking

    AU - Fox, Stephen

    AU - El-Thalji, Idriss

    AU - Altarazi, Safwan

    PY - 2017/8/1

    Y1 - 2017/8/1

    N2 - Industrial thinking is being applied in efforts to try to stem the flow of migrants to Europe. In particular, industrial production in the Middle East is being subsidized by the European Union. This is being done with good intentions. However, positive outcomes are limited. In this paper, it is explained that limited positive outcomes are inevitable, because industrial thinking is too out-of-date and out-of-place to address the causes of mass migration in the Middle East. By contrast, "leapfrog" socio-technical systems could be applied to address the complex causes of mass migration, not as socio-economic crises, but as opportunities for mutual prosperity growth.

    AB - Industrial thinking is being applied in efforts to try to stem the flow of migrants to Europe. In particular, industrial production in the Middle East is being subsidized by the European Union. This is being done with good intentions. However, positive outcomes are limited. In this paper, it is explained that limited positive outcomes are inevitable, because industrial thinking is too out-of-date and out-of-place to address the causes of mass migration in the Middle East. By contrast, "leapfrog" socio-technical systems could be applied to address the complex causes of mass migration, not as socio-economic crises, but as opportunities for mutual prosperity growth.

    KW - industrialization

    KW - leapfrog

    KW - mass migration

    KW - middle east

    KW - prosperity

    KW - socio-technical system

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018552891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 31

    EP - 32

    JO - Technology in Society

    JF - Technology in Society

    SN - 0160-791X

    ER -