Governance challenges and the prevention of industrial environmental accidents: The case of finland

Nina Wessberg (Corresponding Author), Riitta Molarius

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper examines the challenges faced in governing accidental industrial emissions. Accidental emissions are unexpected situations where harmful runaway emissions are released into the environment, causing damage to people, ecosystems, human property and company images. We claim that in Finland the practices of environmental authorities do not encourage companies to prevent accidental emissions in the most effective way. According to our study, based on action research and case study augmented with document analysis and interviews, authorities operate under three different kinds of frame: an environmental permit frame, a risk prevention frame and a major accident prevention frame. Accidental industrial emissions are, in our view, best governed under the risk prevention frame, where practices and management systems are addressed covering the entire complex socio‐technical nature of an industrial process. However, environmental authorities, in Finland, focus on environmental permit frames, stressing limit values, hence concentrating on managing the industrial process component by component. This approach may be suitable for the governing of continuous emissions, but not that of accidental emissions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)371-386
    Number of pages16
    JournalEuropean Environment
    Volume18
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Finland
    accident
    governance
    industrial emission
    accident prevention
    action research
    document analysis
    environmental accident
    damage
    damages
    ecosystem
    interview
    management
    Values
    industrial process

    Keywords

    • Environmental risk analysis
    • environmental risk assessment
    • environmental accident
    • accidental emission
    • incidental emission
    • risk management
    • environmental management
    • environmental governance
    • industry
    • frame analysis
    • case study

    Cite this

    @article{1ccb97faf574461e8bb17561f176a3ad,
    title = "Governance challenges and the prevention of industrial environmental accidents: The case of finland",
    abstract = "This paper examines the challenges faced in governing accidental industrial emissions. Accidental emissions are unexpected situations where harmful runaway emissions are released into the environment, causing damage to people, ecosystems, human property and company images. We claim that in Finland the practices of environmental authorities do not encourage companies to prevent accidental emissions in the most effective way. According to our study, based on action research and case study augmented with document analysis and interviews, authorities operate under three different kinds of frame: an environmental permit frame, a risk prevention frame and a major accident prevention frame. Accidental industrial emissions are, in our view, best governed under the risk prevention frame, where practices and management systems are addressed covering the entire complex socio‐technical nature of an industrial process. However, environmental authorities, in Finland, focus on environmental permit frames, stressing limit values, hence concentrating on managing the industrial process component by component. This approach may be suitable for the governing of continuous emissions, but not that of accidental emissions.",
    keywords = "Environmental risk analysis, environmental risk assessment, environmental accident, accidental emission, incidental emission, risk management, environmental management, environmental governance, industry, frame analysis, case study",
    author = "Nina Wessberg and Riitta Molarius",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1002/eet.490",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "371--386",
    journal = "Environmental Policy and Governance",
    issn = "1756-932X",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "6",

    }

    Governance challenges and the prevention of industrial environmental accidents : The case of finland. / Wessberg, Nina (Corresponding Author); Molarius, Riitta.

    In: European Environment, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2008, p. 371-386.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Governance challenges and the prevention of industrial environmental accidents

    T2 - The case of finland

    AU - Wessberg, Nina

    AU - Molarius, Riitta

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - This paper examines the challenges faced in governing accidental industrial emissions. Accidental emissions are unexpected situations where harmful runaway emissions are released into the environment, causing damage to people, ecosystems, human property and company images. We claim that in Finland the practices of environmental authorities do not encourage companies to prevent accidental emissions in the most effective way. According to our study, based on action research and case study augmented with document analysis and interviews, authorities operate under three different kinds of frame: an environmental permit frame, a risk prevention frame and a major accident prevention frame. Accidental industrial emissions are, in our view, best governed under the risk prevention frame, where practices and management systems are addressed covering the entire complex socio‐technical nature of an industrial process. However, environmental authorities, in Finland, focus on environmental permit frames, stressing limit values, hence concentrating on managing the industrial process component by component. This approach may be suitable for the governing of continuous emissions, but not that of accidental emissions.

    AB - This paper examines the challenges faced in governing accidental industrial emissions. Accidental emissions are unexpected situations where harmful runaway emissions are released into the environment, causing damage to people, ecosystems, human property and company images. We claim that in Finland the practices of environmental authorities do not encourage companies to prevent accidental emissions in the most effective way. According to our study, based on action research and case study augmented with document analysis and interviews, authorities operate under three different kinds of frame: an environmental permit frame, a risk prevention frame and a major accident prevention frame. Accidental industrial emissions are, in our view, best governed under the risk prevention frame, where practices and management systems are addressed covering the entire complex socio‐technical nature of an industrial process. However, environmental authorities, in Finland, focus on environmental permit frames, stressing limit values, hence concentrating on managing the industrial process component by component. This approach may be suitable for the governing of continuous emissions, but not that of accidental emissions.

    KW - Environmental risk analysis

    KW - environmental risk assessment

    KW - environmental accident

    KW - accidental emission

    KW - incidental emission

    KW - risk management

    KW - environmental management

    KW - environmental governance

    KW - industry

    KW - frame analysis

    KW - case study

    U2 - 10.1002/eet.490

    DO - 10.1002/eet.490

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 371

    EP - 386

    JO - Environmental Policy and Governance

    JF - Environmental Policy and Governance

    SN - 1756-932X

    IS - 6

    ER -