Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices

Nina Urala (Corresponding Author), Liisa Lähteenmäki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The associations of liking and perceived healthiness ratings between repeated food choiceswere studied in two experiments. Participants’ snack bar (n=41, Experiment I) and beverage (n=60, Experiment II) choices among six product alternatives were monitored for 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. In Experiment I, participants were allowed to familiarise themselves with snack bar alternatives (“familiar assortment”) prior to making choices. In Experiment II, the participants started making their beverage choices without familiarising themselves (“unfamiliar assortment”). In both experiments, the participants were divided into three groups according to their choice behaviour for each alternative: non-interested (0 choices), experimenters (1 choice) and potential frequent users (2 or more choices). In Experiment I, the overall difference between non-interested and potential frequent users of a product was 1.3 points in expected liking and 2.6 points in actual liking on a 7-point scale (ANOVA, p<0.001). In Experiment II, the overall differences in blind hedonic ratings between non-interested participants and potential frequent users of a product were within a range of 0.9 points (p<0.001). The difference was wider for expected liking ratings, 1.3 points (p<0.001). Neither the perceived healthiness of the samples nor the background attitudes could be consistently associated with the choices (Pearson's correlation coefficient).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-314
JournalAppetite
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Snacks
Functional Food
Pleasure
Beverages
Choice Behavior
Analysis of Variance
Food

Keywords

  • Choice
  • consumers
  • Liking
  • Healthiness
  • Ratings
  • Snack bar
  • Beverage

Cite this

Urala, Nina ; Lähteenmäki, Liisa. / Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices. In: Appetite. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 302-314.
@article{93cb1238d13f473789106fc8a9aa80ca,
title = "Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices",
abstract = "The associations of liking and perceived healthiness ratings between repeated food choiceswere studied in two experiments. Participants’ snack bar (n=41, Experiment I) and beverage (n=60, Experiment II) choices among six product alternatives were monitored for 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. In Experiment I, participants were allowed to familiarise themselves with snack bar alternatives (“familiar assortment”) prior to making choices. In Experiment II, the participants started making their beverage choices without familiarising themselves (“unfamiliar assortment”). In both experiments, the participants were divided into three groups according to their choice behaviour for each alternative: non-interested (0 choices), experimenters (1 choice) and potential frequent users (2 or more choices). In Experiment I, the overall difference between non-interested and potential frequent users of a product was 1.3 points in expected liking and 2.6 points in actual liking on a 7-point scale (ANOVA, p<0.001). In Experiment II, the overall differences in blind hedonic ratings between non-interested participants and potential frequent users of a product were within a range of 0.9 points (p<0.001). The difference was wider for expected liking ratings, 1.3 points (p<0.001). Neither the perceived healthiness of the samples nor the background attitudes could be consistently associated with the choices (Pearson's correlation coefficient).",
keywords = "Choice, consumers, Liking, Healthiness, Ratings, Snack bar, Beverage",
author = "Nina Urala and Liisa L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "302--314",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices. / Urala, Nina (Corresponding Author); Lähteenmäki, Liisa.

In: Appetite, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2006, p. 302-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hedonic ratings and perceived healthiness in experimental functional food choices

AU - Urala, Nina

AU - Lähteenmäki, Liisa

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The associations of liking and perceived healthiness ratings between repeated food choiceswere studied in two experiments. Participants’ snack bar (n=41, Experiment I) and beverage (n=60, Experiment II) choices among six product alternatives were monitored for 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. In Experiment I, participants were allowed to familiarise themselves with snack bar alternatives (“familiar assortment”) prior to making choices. In Experiment II, the participants started making their beverage choices without familiarising themselves (“unfamiliar assortment”). In both experiments, the participants were divided into three groups according to their choice behaviour for each alternative: non-interested (0 choices), experimenters (1 choice) and potential frequent users (2 or more choices). In Experiment I, the overall difference between non-interested and potential frequent users of a product was 1.3 points in expected liking and 2.6 points in actual liking on a 7-point scale (ANOVA, p<0.001). In Experiment II, the overall differences in blind hedonic ratings between non-interested participants and potential frequent users of a product were within a range of 0.9 points (p<0.001). The difference was wider for expected liking ratings, 1.3 points (p<0.001). Neither the perceived healthiness of the samples nor the background attitudes could be consistently associated with the choices (Pearson's correlation coefficient).

AB - The associations of liking and perceived healthiness ratings between repeated food choiceswere studied in two experiments. Participants’ snack bar (n=41, Experiment I) and beverage (n=60, Experiment II) choices among six product alternatives were monitored for 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. In Experiment I, participants were allowed to familiarise themselves with snack bar alternatives (“familiar assortment”) prior to making choices. In Experiment II, the participants started making their beverage choices without familiarising themselves (“unfamiliar assortment”). In both experiments, the participants were divided into three groups according to their choice behaviour for each alternative: non-interested (0 choices), experimenters (1 choice) and potential frequent users (2 or more choices). In Experiment I, the overall difference between non-interested and potential frequent users of a product was 1.3 points in expected liking and 2.6 points in actual liking on a 7-point scale (ANOVA, p<0.001). In Experiment II, the overall differences in blind hedonic ratings between non-interested participants and potential frequent users of a product were within a range of 0.9 points (p<0.001). The difference was wider for expected liking ratings, 1.3 points (p<0.001). Neither the perceived healthiness of the samples nor the background attitudes could be consistently associated with the choices (Pearson's correlation coefficient).

KW - Choice

KW - consumers

KW - Liking

KW - Healthiness

KW - Ratings

KW - Snack bar

KW - Beverage

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.007

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 302

EP - 314

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

IS - 3

ER -