Households’ potential to decrease their environmental impacts: A cost-efficiency analysis of carbon saving measures

Hannele Ahvenniemi, Tarja Häkkinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to quantify the potential levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) and cost savings from a set of households’ energy saving measures, considered as “everyday choices”. Design/methodology/approach: Four areas of living were selected for the study: household electricity, space heating, transport and food consumption. The study used a quantitative research approach in which the impact of selected scenarios of an average Finnish household was assessed. Findings: Findings suggest that GHG savings from behavioural change regarding household electricity remain marginal in comparison to savings gained from transportation related measures. Transportation also provides the most cost-efficient ways to decrease GHGs but not in all cases. Based on the results, the authors suggest that smart technologies, such as on-line, active feedback systems could have a major role in guiding household energy use. Also, given the high GHG savings from transport, the authors highlight the importance of providing infrastructure and services for clean mobility, and in designing well-functioning and compact cities enabling shorter travels. Originality/value: The aim of our study was twofold – by analysing the case household’s choices, we obtained information on environmental and economic impacts, but in addition to this, the aim was to open discussion on the role of households in tackling climate change and how to support households in making sustainable choices. Although research regarding household energy behaviour is vast, so far very few studies have focused on both economic and environmental impacts of households’ everyday actions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Energy Sector Management
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Greenhouse gases
Environmental impact
Carbon
Electricity
Costs
Space heating
Economics
Climate change
Energy conservation
Feedback
Household
Efficiency analysis

Keywords

  • Carbon saving measures
  • CO emission
  • CO mitigation
  • Cost comparison
  • Cost minimization
  • Cost-efficiency
  • Electricity
  • Food consumption
  • Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
  • Household energy behaviour
  • Scenario analysis
  • Sustainable choices
  • Sustainable mobility
  • Transport

Cite this

@article{4e38df9bc93c42ff8bbf483401b79547,
title = "Households’ potential to decrease their environmental impacts: A cost-efficiency analysis of carbon saving measures",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to quantify the potential levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) and cost savings from a set of households’ energy saving measures, considered as “everyday choices”. Design/methodology/approach: Four areas of living were selected for the study: household electricity, space heating, transport and food consumption. The study used a quantitative research approach in which the impact of selected scenarios of an average Finnish household was assessed. Findings: Findings suggest that GHG savings from behavioural change regarding household electricity remain marginal in comparison to savings gained from transportation related measures. Transportation also provides the most cost-efficient ways to decrease GHGs but not in all cases. Based on the results, the authors suggest that smart technologies, such as on-line, active feedback systems could have a major role in guiding household energy use. Also, given the high GHG savings from transport, the authors highlight the importance of providing infrastructure and services for clean mobility, and in designing well-functioning and compact cities enabling shorter travels. Originality/value: The aim of our study was twofold – by analysing the case household’s choices, we obtained information on environmental and economic impacts, but in addition to this, the aim was to open discussion on the role of households in tackling climate change and how to support households in making sustainable choices. Although research regarding household energy behaviour is vast, so far very few studies have focused on both economic and environmental impacts of households’ everyday actions.",
keywords = "Carbon saving measures, CO emission, CO mitigation, Cost comparison, Cost minimization, Cost-efficiency, Electricity, Food consumption, Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), Household energy behaviour, Scenario analysis, Sustainable choices, Sustainable mobility, Transport",
author = "Hannele Ahvenniemi and Tarja H{\"a}kkinen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1108/IJESM-02-2019-0009",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Energy Sector Management",
issn = "1750-6220",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

Households’ potential to decrease their environmental impacts : A cost-efficiency analysis of carbon saving measures. / Ahvenniemi, Hannele; Häkkinen, Tarja.

In: International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Households’ potential to decrease their environmental impacts

T2 - A cost-efficiency analysis of carbon saving measures

AU - Ahvenniemi, Hannele

AU - Häkkinen, Tarja

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to quantify the potential levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) and cost savings from a set of households’ energy saving measures, considered as “everyday choices”. Design/methodology/approach: Four areas of living were selected for the study: household electricity, space heating, transport and food consumption. The study used a quantitative research approach in which the impact of selected scenarios of an average Finnish household was assessed. Findings: Findings suggest that GHG savings from behavioural change regarding household electricity remain marginal in comparison to savings gained from transportation related measures. Transportation also provides the most cost-efficient ways to decrease GHGs but not in all cases. Based on the results, the authors suggest that smart technologies, such as on-line, active feedback systems could have a major role in guiding household energy use. Also, given the high GHG savings from transport, the authors highlight the importance of providing infrastructure and services for clean mobility, and in designing well-functioning and compact cities enabling shorter travels. Originality/value: The aim of our study was twofold – by analysing the case household’s choices, we obtained information on environmental and economic impacts, but in addition to this, the aim was to open discussion on the role of households in tackling climate change and how to support households in making sustainable choices. Although research regarding household energy behaviour is vast, so far very few studies have focused on both economic and environmental impacts of households’ everyday actions.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to quantify the potential levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) and cost savings from a set of households’ energy saving measures, considered as “everyday choices”. Design/methodology/approach: Four areas of living were selected for the study: household electricity, space heating, transport and food consumption. The study used a quantitative research approach in which the impact of selected scenarios of an average Finnish household was assessed. Findings: Findings suggest that GHG savings from behavioural change regarding household electricity remain marginal in comparison to savings gained from transportation related measures. Transportation also provides the most cost-efficient ways to decrease GHGs but not in all cases. Based on the results, the authors suggest that smart technologies, such as on-line, active feedback systems could have a major role in guiding household energy use. Also, given the high GHG savings from transport, the authors highlight the importance of providing infrastructure and services for clean mobility, and in designing well-functioning and compact cities enabling shorter travels. Originality/value: The aim of our study was twofold – by analysing the case household’s choices, we obtained information on environmental and economic impacts, but in addition to this, the aim was to open discussion on the role of households in tackling climate change and how to support households in making sustainable choices. Although research regarding household energy behaviour is vast, so far very few studies have focused on both economic and environmental impacts of households’ everyday actions.

KW - Carbon saving measures

KW - CO emission

KW - CO mitigation

KW - Cost comparison

KW - Cost minimization

KW - Cost-efficiency

KW - Electricity

KW - Food consumption

KW - Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)

KW - Household energy behaviour

KW - Scenario analysis

KW - Sustainable choices

KW - Sustainable mobility

KW - Transport

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069918920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJESM-02-2019-0009

DO - 10.1108/IJESM-02-2019-0009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069918920

JO - International Journal of Energy Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Energy Sector Management

SN - 1750-6220

ER -