How drivers understand safe behaviour and perceive risks at passive railway-road level crossings

Juha Luoma, Mikko Poutanen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study was designed to investigate how drivers assess safety issues at passive railway-road level crossings. The study was limited to traditional and relatively inexpensive safety measures. Fifty-six car and van drivers were interviewed after passive level crossings with low traffic volume. Both key requirements of safe behaviour (i.e. decrease of speed and looking for trains) were indicated by 36-71% of drivers depending on the classification of responses. This result suggests that a substantial percentage of drivers have no proper concept of safe behaviour at level crossings. Another important result was that drivers found the crossing of main roads to be more difficult than crossing passive railway-road level crossings - despite the fact that they considered the latter to be more dangerous. This suggests that the drivers estimated the crash risk at railway-road level crossings to be relatively low, although they know that it is dangerous in general. Furthermore, the drivers suggested that the conspicuity of level crossings could be improved by increasing lateral visibility early enough and with advance warning signs. The drivers also suggested that caution could be increased with the use of STOP signs, improving the visibility of road signs and increasing the lateral visibility of tracks. The results suggest that there are several potential safety measures that could support drivers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)88-91
    Number of pages4
    JournalOpen Transportation Journal
    Volume5
    Issue numberSpecial Issue
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Level Crossing
    Railway
    Visibility
    Driver
    German Federal Railways
    driver
    road
    Railroad cars
    Safety
    Lateral
    traffic volume
    Crash
    Percentage
    Traffic
    Decrease

    Keywords

    • Railway-road grade crossing
    • drivers
    • traffic safety
    • behaviour
    • interviews

    Cite this

    Luoma, Juha ; Poutanen, Mikko. / How drivers understand safe behaviour and perceive risks at passive railway-road level crossings. In: Open Transportation Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. Special Issue. pp. 88-91.
    @article{c6d6961602ab4b10afe412507f5c9765,
    title = "How drivers understand safe behaviour and perceive risks at passive railway-road level crossings",
    abstract = "This study was designed to investigate how drivers assess safety issues at passive railway-road level crossings. The study was limited to traditional and relatively inexpensive safety measures. Fifty-six car and van drivers were interviewed after passive level crossings with low traffic volume. Both key requirements of safe behaviour (i.e. decrease of speed and looking for trains) were indicated by 36-71{\%} of drivers depending on the classification of responses. This result suggests that a substantial percentage of drivers have no proper concept of safe behaviour at level crossings. Another important result was that drivers found the crossing of main roads to be more difficult than crossing passive railway-road level crossings - despite the fact that they considered the latter to be more dangerous. This suggests that the drivers estimated the crash risk at railway-road level crossings to be relatively low, although they know that it is dangerous in general. Furthermore, the drivers suggested that the conspicuity of level crossings could be improved by increasing lateral visibility early enough and with advance warning signs. The drivers also suggested that caution could be increased with the use of STOP signs, improving the visibility of road signs and increasing the lateral visibility of tracks. The results suggest that there are several potential safety measures that could support drivers.",
    keywords = "Railway-road grade crossing, drivers, traffic safety, behaviour, interviews",
    author = "Juha Luoma and Mikko Poutanen",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.2174/1874447801105010088",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "88--91",
    journal = "Open Transportation Journal",
    issn = "1874-4478",
    publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers",
    number = "Special Issue",

    }

    How drivers understand safe behaviour and perceive risks at passive railway-road level crossings. / Luoma, Juha; Poutanen, Mikko.

    In: Open Transportation Journal, Vol. 5, No. Special Issue, 2011, p. 88-91.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How drivers understand safe behaviour and perceive risks at passive railway-road level crossings

    AU - Luoma, Juha

    AU - Poutanen, Mikko

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - This study was designed to investigate how drivers assess safety issues at passive railway-road level crossings. The study was limited to traditional and relatively inexpensive safety measures. Fifty-six car and van drivers were interviewed after passive level crossings with low traffic volume. Both key requirements of safe behaviour (i.e. decrease of speed and looking for trains) were indicated by 36-71% of drivers depending on the classification of responses. This result suggests that a substantial percentage of drivers have no proper concept of safe behaviour at level crossings. Another important result was that drivers found the crossing of main roads to be more difficult than crossing passive railway-road level crossings - despite the fact that they considered the latter to be more dangerous. This suggests that the drivers estimated the crash risk at railway-road level crossings to be relatively low, although they know that it is dangerous in general. Furthermore, the drivers suggested that the conspicuity of level crossings could be improved by increasing lateral visibility early enough and with advance warning signs. The drivers also suggested that caution could be increased with the use of STOP signs, improving the visibility of road signs and increasing the lateral visibility of tracks. The results suggest that there are several potential safety measures that could support drivers.

    AB - This study was designed to investigate how drivers assess safety issues at passive railway-road level crossings. The study was limited to traditional and relatively inexpensive safety measures. Fifty-six car and van drivers were interviewed after passive level crossings with low traffic volume. Both key requirements of safe behaviour (i.e. decrease of speed and looking for trains) were indicated by 36-71% of drivers depending on the classification of responses. This result suggests that a substantial percentage of drivers have no proper concept of safe behaviour at level crossings. Another important result was that drivers found the crossing of main roads to be more difficult than crossing passive railway-road level crossings - despite the fact that they considered the latter to be more dangerous. This suggests that the drivers estimated the crash risk at railway-road level crossings to be relatively low, although they know that it is dangerous in general. Furthermore, the drivers suggested that the conspicuity of level crossings could be improved by increasing lateral visibility early enough and with advance warning signs. The drivers also suggested that caution could be increased with the use of STOP signs, improving the visibility of road signs and increasing the lateral visibility of tracks. The results suggest that there are several potential safety measures that could support drivers.

    KW - Railway-road grade crossing

    KW - drivers

    KW - traffic safety

    KW - behaviour

    KW - interviews

    U2 - 10.2174/1874447801105010088

    DO - 10.2174/1874447801105010088

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 88

    EP - 91

    JO - Open Transportation Journal

    JF - Open Transportation Journal

    SN - 1874-4478

    IS - Special Issue

    ER -