How necessary are intermediary organizations in the commercialization of research?

N. Suvinen (Corresponding Author), Jari Konttinen, Mika Nieminen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As universities around the world are under pressure to produce commercial outputs of their research results, it is surprising how a few studies have been conducted about intermediary organizations and their role in this matter. The intermediaries’ basic roles to diminish market and system failures in innovation processes are targeted to respond to the challenges that may emerge in innovation processes, in general, especially in the commercialization of academic research. In this article, we analyse the roles of, and needs for, different kinds of intermediary organizations in two Finnish technology agglomerations from the perspective of the commercialization of new knowledge. We use the Triple Helix concept as a theoretical starting point for our empirical analysis. As many challenges in Triple Helix linkages prove that policy interventions to support the activities of intermediary organizations are justified up to certain point. However, the role of these “go-between” actors may also be irrelevant if networks between university–firm–government helices function well. In addition, many of the challenges in the commercialization of new knowledge originated from the failures of policy implementation concerning the public or semi-public intermediaries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1365-1389
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Planning Studies
Volume18
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

intermediary organization
commercialization
innovation
academic research
policy implementation
empirical analysis
agglomeration
research results
knowledge
agglomeration area
market
university
public

Cite this

@article{64a8c2b9f9e44bb7a3b6edb1c38dccc1,
title = "How necessary are intermediary organizations in the commercialization of research?",
abstract = "As universities around the world are under pressure to produce commercial outputs of their research results, it is surprising how a few studies have been conducted about intermediary organizations and their role in this matter. The intermediaries’ basic roles to diminish market and system failures in innovation processes are targeted to respond to the challenges that may emerge in innovation processes, in general, especially in the commercialization of academic research. In this article, we analyse the roles of, and needs for, different kinds of intermediary organizations in two Finnish technology agglomerations from the perspective of the commercialization of new knowledge. We use the Triple Helix concept as a theoretical starting point for our empirical analysis. As many challenges in Triple Helix linkages prove that policy interventions to support the activities of intermediary organizations are justified up to certain point. However, the role of these “go-between” actors may also be irrelevant if networks between university–firm–government helices function well. In addition, many of the challenges in the commercialization of new knowledge originated from the failures of policy implementation concerning the public or semi-public intermediaries.",
author = "N. Suvinen and Jari Konttinen and Mika Nieminen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/09654313.2010.492584",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1365--1389",
journal = "European Planning Studies",
issn = "0965-4313",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "9",

}

How necessary are intermediary organizations in the commercialization of research? / Suvinen, N. (Corresponding Author); Konttinen, Jari; Nieminen, Mika.

In: European Planning Studies, Vol. 18, No. 9, 2010, p. 1365-1389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How necessary are intermediary organizations in the commercialization of research?

AU - Suvinen, N.

AU - Konttinen, Jari

AU - Nieminen, Mika

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - As universities around the world are under pressure to produce commercial outputs of their research results, it is surprising how a few studies have been conducted about intermediary organizations and their role in this matter. The intermediaries’ basic roles to diminish market and system failures in innovation processes are targeted to respond to the challenges that may emerge in innovation processes, in general, especially in the commercialization of academic research. In this article, we analyse the roles of, and needs for, different kinds of intermediary organizations in two Finnish technology agglomerations from the perspective of the commercialization of new knowledge. We use the Triple Helix concept as a theoretical starting point for our empirical analysis. As many challenges in Triple Helix linkages prove that policy interventions to support the activities of intermediary organizations are justified up to certain point. However, the role of these “go-between” actors may also be irrelevant if networks between university–firm–government helices function well. In addition, many of the challenges in the commercialization of new knowledge originated from the failures of policy implementation concerning the public or semi-public intermediaries.

AB - As universities around the world are under pressure to produce commercial outputs of their research results, it is surprising how a few studies have been conducted about intermediary organizations and their role in this matter. The intermediaries’ basic roles to diminish market and system failures in innovation processes are targeted to respond to the challenges that may emerge in innovation processes, in general, especially in the commercialization of academic research. In this article, we analyse the roles of, and needs for, different kinds of intermediary organizations in two Finnish technology agglomerations from the perspective of the commercialization of new knowledge. We use the Triple Helix concept as a theoretical starting point for our empirical analysis. As many challenges in Triple Helix linkages prove that policy interventions to support the activities of intermediary organizations are justified up to certain point. However, the role of these “go-between” actors may also be irrelevant if networks between university–firm–government helices function well. In addition, many of the challenges in the commercialization of new knowledge originated from the failures of policy implementation concerning the public or semi-public intermediaries.

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2010.492584

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2010.492584

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1365

EP - 1389

JO - European Planning Studies

JF - European Planning Studies

SN - 0965-4313

IS - 9

ER -