How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach

M Marttunen (Corresponding Author), J Mustajoki, Mikko Dufva, T P Karjalainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MCDA is increasingly used to support participatory and collaborative processes. In this paper, we describe and evaluate four real-life environmental planning projects where MCDA was used in different ways to evaluate the alternatives and to support stakeholder involvement. Based on our experience, we present five approaches for eliciting preferences or criteria weights of stakeholders, which vary from an expert-driven to a personal interview approach. We compare the pros and cons of these approaches, and give recommendations regarding their use. We believe that better awareness of different approaches and their applicability would enable MCDA experts to design more effective, meaningful and practical participatory processes. Our cases are from environmental planning, but the framework and conclusions are generic and thus applicable to other fields as well.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-214
Number of pages28
JournalEURO Journal on Decision Processes
Volume3
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

stakeholder
environmental planning
participation

Keywords

  • Multi-criteria decision analysis
  • decision analysis interviews
  • environmental decision making
  • stakeholder involvement

Cite this

Marttunen, M ; Mustajoki, J ; Dufva, Mikko ; Karjalainen, T P. / How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach. In: EURO Journal on Decision Processes. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 1-2. pp. 187-214.
@article{762bb8b42d724eac92bd9bd568f31fa4,
title = "How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach",
abstract = "MCDA is increasingly used to support participatory and collaborative processes. In this paper, we describe and evaluate four real-life environmental planning projects where MCDA was used in different ways to evaluate the alternatives and to support stakeholder involvement. Based on our experience, we present five approaches for eliciting preferences or criteria weights of stakeholders, which vary from an expert-driven to a personal interview approach. We compare the pros and cons of these approaches, and give recommendations regarding their use. We believe that better awareness of different approaches and their applicability would enable MCDA experts to design more effective, meaningful and practical participatory processes. Our cases are from environmental planning, but the framework and conclusions are generic and thus applicable to other fields as well.",
keywords = "Multi-criteria decision analysis, decision analysis interviews, environmental decision making, stakeholder involvement",
author = "M Marttunen and J Mustajoki and Mikko Dufva and Karjalainen, {T P}",
note = "Project code: 82582 - GS 2013",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "187--214",
journal = "EURO Journal on Decision Processes",
issn = "2193-9438",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1-2",

}

How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach. / Marttunen, M (Corresponding Author); Mustajoki, J; Dufva, Mikko; Karjalainen, T P.

In: EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 2013, p. 187-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach

AU - Marttunen, M

AU - Mustajoki, J

AU - Dufva, Mikko

AU - Karjalainen, T P

N1 - Project code: 82582 - GS 2013

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - MCDA is increasingly used to support participatory and collaborative processes. In this paper, we describe and evaluate four real-life environmental planning projects where MCDA was used in different ways to evaluate the alternatives and to support stakeholder involvement. Based on our experience, we present five approaches for eliciting preferences or criteria weights of stakeholders, which vary from an expert-driven to a personal interview approach. We compare the pros and cons of these approaches, and give recommendations regarding their use. We believe that better awareness of different approaches and their applicability would enable MCDA experts to design more effective, meaningful and practical participatory processes. Our cases are from environmental planning, but the framework and conclusions are generic and thus applicable to other fields as well.

AB - MCDA is increasingly used to support participatory and collaborative processes. In this paper, we describe and evaluate four real-life environmental planning projects where MCDA was used in different ways to evaluate the alternatives and to support stakeholder involvement. Based on our experience, we present five approaches for eliciting preferences or criteria weights of stakeholders, which vary from an expert-driven to a personal interview approach. We compare the pros and cons of these approaches, and give recommendations regarding their use. We believe that better awareness of different approaches and their applicability would enable MCDA experts to design more effective, meaningful and practical participatory processes. Our cases are from environmental planning, but the framework and conclusions are generic and thus applicable to other fields as well.

KW - Multi-criteria decision analysis

KW - decision analysis interviews

KW - environmental decision making

KW - stakeholder involvement

U2 - 10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3

DO - 10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 187

EP - 214

JO - EURO Journal on Decision Processes

JF - EURO Journal on Decision Processes

SN - 2193-9438

IS - 1-2

ER -