Abstract
Companies need to control several different sectors of
corporate safety and security including, for example,
occupational health and safety, environmental safety,
premises security, crime prevention, rescue operations
and emergency planning, information security, and
personnel security. All these sectors contribute towards
the total corporate safety and security of a company. By
collecting information about different types of
incidents, a company can learn about how to prevent
future incidents, and thus make the company safer.
Incidents, as referred to here, include accidents,
near-misses, and other deviations such as hazardous
situations. A company can internally collect information
about those event chains that can lead to accidents. The
time and place, the object and consequences, and causes
and preventive and corrective actions, are all examples
of important information collected about incidents. Even
if a company recognizes the importance of preventive
data, it might be difficult to organize the collection,
handling, and utilization of this information. Computer
software is nowadays essential, but it can not address
all the aspects associated with the incident reporting
process.
The organization of the incident reporting process was
investigated at VTT using three case studies during
2005-2006. Key questions of the study were: 1) how to
model all the parts of the incident reporting process,
and 2) how to evaluate the quality of incident reporting
process. All the actions, the different actors, and the
different documents and information flow relating to the
incident reporting process were modelled. The important
phases of the process were: a) identifying an incident
and acting immediately (understanding hazards), b)
informing the supervisor about the incident (motivational
factors), c) handling the incident reports (systematic
documentation), d) investigating the incident
(understanding analysis frameworks), e) decision making
about solutions and improvements by utilizing the
collected data, f) implementing and monitoring the
corrective and preventive actions (reacting), and f)
observing the general view and evaluating the incident
reporting process. The study contained three case
companies: an oil refinery, a chemical factory, and an
amusement park. Three incident reporting processes were
modelled with the data collected from the companies. The
three case models were used to develop an evaluation tool
for the incident reporting process.
This paper discusses the modelling and evaluation of the
incident reporting process. The main purpose is to show
that modelling of the incident reporting process gives an
opportunity for a company to evaluate and improve the
quality of the incident reporting process. Based on the
research carried out, principles and ideas for assessing
the different phases of the incident reporting process
are presented.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings |
Subtitle of host publication | 12th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, IChemE 2007 |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
Event | Loss Prevention 2007, 12th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Prommotion in the Process Industries, IChemE 2007 - Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom Duration: 22 May 2007 → 24 May 2007 |
Conference
Conference | Loss Prevention 2007, 12th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Prommotion in the Process Industries, IChemE 2007 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | IChemE 2007 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Edinburgh, Scotland |
Period | 22/05/07 → 24/05/07 |
Keywords
- incident reporting
- near-miss reporting
- incident analysis