How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Early involvement of the construction team is increasingly utilized in challenging projects to incorporate versatile expertise in their planning. For public owners this is a challenge since they are obliged to use competitive, transparent team selection based on the ‘most economically advantageous criterion’ which ensures that both price and quality viewpoints are taken into account. In the case of early involvement, the price component naturally does not include the total price, but may consist only of the fees of competing service providers. This study examines such a selection situation and seeks to find a way to integrate the fee component in a multi-criteria selection system and determine reasonable fees for different levels of capabilities. The study builds on the productivity difference between different competences, derived from a survey of practitioners, and determines an indifference curve arithmetically for the planning of a selection method. The influence of the owner’s risk attitude and risk premiums are also taken into account based on the pricing methods of the theory of finance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK
    PublisherAssociation of Researchers in Construction Management
    Pages945-955
    ISBN (Electronic)978-0-9552390-6-9
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

    Fingerprint

    Proportion
    Fees
    Owners
    Planning
    Productivity
    Multi-criteria
    Risk premium
    Selection system
    Expertise
    Risk attitude
    Service provider
    Pricing
    Indifference
    Finance

    Cite this

    Lahdenperä, P. (2012). How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement. In Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 945-955). Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
    Lahdenperä, Pertti. / How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement. Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2012. pp. 945-955
    @inproceedings{e2cd2201c1ae427a922d0cf19916e412,
    title = "How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement",
    abstract = "Early involvement of the construction team is increasingly utilized in challenging projects to incorporate versatile expertise in their planning. For public owners this is a challenge since they are obliged to use competitive, transparent team selection based on the ‘most economically advantageous criterion’ which ensures that both price and quality viewpoints are taken into account. In the case of early involvement, the price component naturally does not include the total price, but may consist only of the fees of competing service providers. This study examines such a selection situation and seeks to find a way to integrate the fee component in a multi-criteria selection system and determine reasonable fees for different levels of capabilities. The study builds on the productivity difference between different competences, derived from a survey of practitioners, and determines an indifference curve arithmetically for the planning of a selection method. The influence of the owner’s risk attitude and risk premiums are also taken into account based on the pricing methods of the theory of finance.",
    author = "Pertti Lahdenper{\"a}",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    pages = "945--955",
    booktitle = "Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK",
    publisher = "Association of Researchers in Construction Management",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Lahdenperä, P 2012, How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement. in Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 945-955.

    How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement. / Lahdenperä, Pertti.

    Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2012. p. 945-955.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement

    AU - Lahdenperä, Pertti

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Early involvement of the construction team is increasingly utilized in challenging projects to incorporate versatile expertise in their planning. For public owners this is a challenge since they are obliged to use competitive, transparent team selection based on the ‘most economically advantageous criterion’ which ensures that both price and quality viewpoints are taken into account. In the case of early involvement, the price component naturally does not include the total price, but may consist only of the fees of competing service providers. This study examines such a selection situation and seeks to find a way to integrate the fee component in a multi-criteria selection system and determine reasonable fees for different levels of capabilities. The study builds on the productivity difference between different competences, derived from a survey of practitioners, and determines an indifference curve arithmetically for the planning of a selection method. The influence of the owner’s risk attitude and risk premiums are also taken into account based on the pricing methods of the theory of finance.

    AB - Early involvement of the construction team is increasingly utilized in challenging projects to incorporate versatile expertise in their planning. For public owners this is a challenge since they are obliged to use competitive, transparent team selection based on the ‘most economically advantageous criterion’ which ensures that both price and quality viewpoints are taken into account. In the case of early involvement, the price component naturally does not include the total price, but may consist only of the fees of competing service providers. This study examines such a selection situation and seeks to find a way to integrate the fee component in a multi-criteria selection system and determine reasonable fees for different levels of capabilities. The study builds on the productivity difference between different competences, derived from a survey of practitioners, and determines an indifference curve arithmetically for the planning of a selection method. The influence of the owner’s risk attitude and risk premiums are also taken into account based on the pricing methods of the theory of finance.

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    SP - 945

    EP - 955

    BT - Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK

    PB - Association of Researchers in Construction Management

    ER -

    Lahdenperä P. How to proportion capability and fee percentage for team comparison in competitive early involvement. In Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 2012. p. 945-955