Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hydropower Flexibility for Power Systems with Variable Renewable Energy Sources: An IEA Task 25 Collaboration

  • Daniel Huertas-Hernando
  • , Hossein Farahmand
  • , Hannele Holttinen
  • , Juha Kiviluoma
  • , Erkka Rinne
  • , Lennart Söder
  • , Michael Milligan
  • , Eduardo Ibanez
  • , Sergio M. Martinez
  • , Emilio Gómez-Lázaro
  • , Ana Estanqueiro
  • , Luis Rodrigues
  • , Luis Carr
  • , Serafin van Roon
  • , Antje Orths
  • , Peter B. Eriksen
  • , Alain Forcione
  • , Nickie Menemenlis
    • SINTEF AS
    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
    • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
    • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
    • University of Castilla-La Mancha
    • National Laboratory of Energy and Geology
    • Research Association for Energy Economics (FfE GmbH)
    • Energinet
    • Hydro Québec's Research Institute (IREQ)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter or book articleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    In order to effectively utilize hydro production flexibility, a sufficient amount of transmission capacity has to be available between the hydro-dominated part of the system and the part that requires operational flexibility. This chapter starts with a rough categorization of “base” hydropower flexibility, investigating the types of hydropower plants installed in power systems today. The “effective” hydropower flexibility available to support the integration of variable generation is a far more complex and case-specific aspect. It is discussed through national experiences. The chapter presents potential developments that would increase the participation of hydropower and discuss the ensuing challenges. Modeling a flow-based hydro system is a complex exercise, as is modeling the power system. Especially important is the correct assessment of hydropower flexibility to support power systems with a large share of variable generation (VG) and its value for storage. With increasing uncertainty and variability, a stochastic scheduling approach should yield lower costs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAdvances in Energy Systems
    Subtitle of host publicationThe Large-scale Renewable Energy Integration Challenge
    PublisherWiley-VCH Verlag
    Chapter23
    Pages385-405
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Electronic)9781119508311
    ISBN (Print)9781119508281
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
    MoE publication typeA3 Part of a book or another research book

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • flow-based hydro system
    • hydropower flexibility
    • hydropower plants types
    • power system
    • stochastic scheduling approach
    • variable generation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hydropower Flexibility for Power Systems with Variable Renewable Energy Sources: An IEA Task 25 Collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this