Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using a multi-objective optimization scheme

Mohamed Hamdy, Ala Hasan, Kai Siren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently adaptive thermal-comfort criteria have been introduced in the international indoor-climate standards to reduce the heating/cooling energy requirements. In 2008, the Finnish Society of Indoor Air Quality (FiSIAQ) developed the national adaptive thermal-comfort criteria of Finland. The current study evaluates the impact of the Finnish Criteria on energy performance in an office building. Two fully mechanically air-conditioned single offices are taken as representative zones. A simulation-based optimization scheme (a combination of IDA-ICE 4.0 and a multi-objective genetic-algorithm from MATLAB-2008a) is employed to determine the minimum primary energy use and the minimum room cooling-equipment size required for different thermal comfort levels. The applicability of implementing energy-saving measures such as night ventilation, night set-back temperature, day lighting as well as optimal building envelope and optimal HVAC settings are addressed by investigating 24 design variables. The results show that, on average, an additional 10 kWh/(m2 a) primary energy demand and a larger 10 W/m2 room cooling-equipment size are required to improve the thermal comfort from medium (S2) to high-quality (S1) class; higher thermal comfort levels limit the use of night ventilation and water radiator night-set back options. Compared with the ISO EN 7730-2005 standard, the Finnish criterion could slightly decrease the heating/cooling equipment size. However, it significantly increases both the heating and cooling energy demand; the results show 32.8% increase in the primary energy demand. It is concluded that the Finnish criterion-2008 is strict and does not allow for energy-efficient solutions in standard office buildings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2055-2067
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume43
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Thermal comfort
Multiobjective optimization
Cooling
Office buildings
Heating
Ventilation
Radiators
Air quality
MATLAB
Energy conservation
Lighting
Genetic algorithms
Air
Water
Temperature

Keywords

  • Adaptive approach
  • Cooling equipment size
  • Multi-objective optimization
  • Primary energy
  • Simulation
  • Thermal comfort

Cite this

@article{56a6aef13e5e478d833b80570b079e27,
title = "Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using a multi-objective optimization scheme",
abstract = "Recently adaptive thermal-comfort criteria have been introduced in the international indoor-climate standards to reduce the heating/cooling energy requirements. In 2008, the Finnish Society of Indoor Air Quality (FiSIAQ) developed the national adaptive thermal-comfort criteria of Finland. The current study evaluates the impact of the Finnish Criteria on energy performance in an office building. Two fully mechanically air-conditioned single offices are taken as representative zones. A simulation-based optimization scheme (a combination of IDA-ICE 4.0 and a multi-objective genetic-algorithm from MATLAB-2008a) is employed to determine the minimum primary energy use and the minimum room cooling-equipment size required for different thermal comfort levels. The applicability of implementing energy-saving measures such as night ventilation, night set-back temperature, day lighting as well as optimal building envelope and optimal HVAC settings are addressed by investigating 24 design variables. The results show that, on average, an additional 10 kWh/(m2 a) primary energy demand and a larger 10 W/m2 room cooling-equipment size are required to improve the thermal comfort from medium (S2) to high-quality (S1) class; higher thermal comfort levels limit the use of night ventilation and water radiator night-set back options. Compared with the ISO EN 7730-2005 standard, the Finnish criterion could slightly decrease the heating/cooling equipment size. However, it significantly increases both the heating and cooling energy demand; the results show 32.8{\%} increase in the primary energy demand. It is concluded that the Finnish criterion-2008 is strict and does not allow for energy-efficient solutions in standard office buildings.",
keywords = "Adaptive approach, Cooling equipment size, Multi-objective optimization, Primary energy, Simulation, Thermal comfort",
author = "Mohamed Hamdy and Ala Hasan and Kai Siren",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.006",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "2055--2067",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using a multi-objective optimization scheme. / Hamdy, Mohamed; Hasan, Ala; Siren, Kai.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, No. 9, 01.09.2011, p. 2055-2067.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using a multi-objective optimization scheme

AU - Hamdy, Mohamed

AU - Hasan, Ala

AU - Siren, Kai

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Recently adaptive thermal-comfort criteria have been introduced in the international indoor-climate standards to reduce the heating/cooling energy requirements. In 2008, the Finnish Society of Indoor Air Quality (FiSIAQ) developed the national adaptive thermal-comfort criteria of Finland. The current study evaluates the impact of the Finnish Criteria on energy performance in an office building. Two fully mechanically air-conditioned single offices are taken as representative zones. A simulation-based optimization scheme (a combination of IDA-ICE 4.0 and a multi-objective genetic-algorithm from MATLAB-2008a) is employed to determine the minimum primary energy use and the minimum room cooling-equipment size required for different thermal comfort levels. The applicability of implementing energy-saving measures such as night ventilation, night set-back temperature, day lighting as well as optimal building envelope and optimal HVAC settings are addressed by investigating 24 design variables. The results show that, on average, an additional 10 kWh/(m2 a) primary energy demand and a larger 10 W/m2 room cooling-equipment size are required to improve the thermal comfort from medium (S2) to high-quality (S1) class; higher thermal comfort levels limit the use of night ventilation and water radiator night-set back options. Compared with the ISO EN 7730-2005 standard, the Finnish criterion could slightly decrease the heating/cooling equipment size. However, it significantly increases both the heating and cooling energy demand; the results show 32.8% increase in the primary energy demand. It is concluded that the Finnish criterion-2008 is strict and does not allow for energy-efficient solutions in standard office buildings.

AB - Recently adaptive thermal-comfort criteria have been introduced in the international indoor-climate standards to reduce the heating/cooling energy requirements. In 2008, the Finnish Society of Indoor Air Quality (FiSIAQ) developed the national adaptive thermal-comfort criteria of Finland. The current study evaluates the impact of the Finnish Criteria on energy performance in an office building. Two fully mechanically air-conditioned single offices are taken as representative zones. A simulation-based optimization scheme (a combination of IDA-ICE 4.0 and a multi-objective genetic-algorithm from MATLAB-2008a) is employed to determine the minimum primary energy use and the minimum room cooling-equipment size required for different thermal comfort levels. The applicability of implementing energy-saving measures such as night ventilation, night set-back temperature, day lighting as well as optimal building envelope and optimal HVAC settings are addressed by investigating 24 design variables. The results show that, on average, an additional 10 kWh/(m2 a) primary energy demand and a larger 10 W/m2 room cooling-equipment size are required to improve the thermal comfort from medium (S2) to high-quality (S1) class; higher thermal comfort levels limit the use of night ventilation and water radiator night-set back options. Compared with the ISO EN 7730-2005 standard, the Finnish criterion could slightly decrease the heating/cooling equipment size. However, it significantly increases both the heating and cooling energy demand; the results show 32.8% increase in the primary energy demand. It is concluded that the Finnish criterion-2008 is strict and does not allow for energy-efficient solutions in standard office buildings.

KW - Adaptive approach

KW - Cooling equipment size

KW - Multi-objective optimization

KW - Primary energy

KW - Simulation

KW - Thermal comfort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960734143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960734143

VL - 43

SP - 2055

EP - 2067

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - 9

ER -