Impact of GEM foil hole geometry on GEM detector gain

A. Karadzhinova*, A. Nolvi, R. Veenhof, Eija Tuominen, E. Hæggström, I. Kassamakov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Detailed 3D imaging of Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) foil hole geometry was realized. Scanning White Light Interferometry was used to examine six topological parameters of GEM foil holes from both sides of the foil. To study the effect of the hole geometry on detector gain, the ANSYS and Garfield ++ software were employed to simulate the GEM detector gain on the basis of SWLI data. In particular, the effective gain in a GEM foil with equally shaped holes was studied. The real GEM foil holes exhibited a 4% lower effective gain and 6% more electrons produced near the exit electrode of the GEM foil than the design anticipated. Our results indicate that the GEM foil hole geometry affects the gain performance of GEM detectors.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberP12014
JournalJournal of Instrumentation
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Control and monitor systems online
  • Detection of defects
  • Detector modelling and simulations II (electric fields, charge transport, multiplication and induction, pulse formation, electron emission, etc)
  • Micropattern gaseous detectors (MSGC, GEM, THGEM, RETHGEM, MHSP, MICROPIC, MICROMEGAS, InGrid, etc)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of GEM foil hole geometry on GEM detector gain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this