Abstract
The ASTM J–R-curve testing standard contains an incremental crack growth correction to J,
whereas the ESIS P2 test procedure contains a correction for the total
crack growth. The ASTM expression is only applicable to single specimen J–R-curve
testing in contrast to the ESIS expression which is also applicable for
multi-specimen tests. The ASTM expression is, however, considered to be
more accurate than the ESIS expression. It is of interest to unify the
test procedures so that irrespective of standard, the same result would
be obtained. Having this goal in mind, the different crack growth
corrections have been examined and compared both with each other as well
as with other analytical and numerical estimates, applicable both in
incremental as well as integral form. As a result a new correction is
proposed, which is capable of unifying the different testing standards.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1601 - 1614 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Engineering Fracture Mechanics |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- crack growth
- crack growth rate
- fatique
- ProperTune