Abstract
The purpose of this research was to find out the economic
and efficiency benefits of applying carbon capture and
storage in combined heat and power (CHP) production in
comparison to solely power production applications.
Utilization of low temperature process heat from capture
plant, air separation unit or CO2 compression in district
heating system and/or industrial solutions offers
significant integration potential to increase overall
efficiency and feasibility of CCS processes. Case
examples include two studies, namely retrofitting of post
combustion CCS and greenfield investment on new
circulated fluidized bed (CFB) based CHP plant utilizing
oxyfuel.
The case studies are based on real and existing CHP
plants and energy systems. The studied CFB option
includes three designs for different fuel mixes,
including biomass (bioCCS or BECCS), which lead to carbon
sink ("negative emissions") on life cycle basis. This
could be a significant benefit also in terms of
acceptance of CCS. Carbon capture processes were modeled
using Aspen Plus process modelling software and the
results were used in VTT's economic toolkit (CC-SkynetT).
Special attention was paid on sensitivity analysis,
focusing on profitability with different prices of fuels,
heat, electricity and CO2 emissions.
The results showed that significant improvements can be
achieved by CHP in plants utilizing CCS, especially if
condensing mode operation of the plants is possible to
achieve high peak load hours during low heat demand. By
this, the decrease in plant net power output due to CCS
can be partly compensated
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The 4th Korea CCS International Conference |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | Not Eligible |
Event | The 4th Korea CCS International Conference - Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of Duration: 24 Feb 2014 → 26 Feb 2014 |
Conference
Conference | The 4th Korea CCS International Conference |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Korea, Republic of |
City | Jeju Island |
Period | 24/02/14 → 26/02/14 |
Keywords
- Combined heat and power
- heat integration
- cost
- feasibility
- case study