Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions

Kenneth Holmberg (Corresponding Author), Ali Erdemir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    150 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Calculations of the impact of friction and wear on energy consumption, economic expenditure, and CO 2 emissions are presented on a global scale. This impact study covers the four main energy consuming sectors: transportation, manufacturing, power generation, and residential. Previously published four case studies on passenger cars, trucks and buses, paper machines and the mining industry were included in our detailed calculations as reference data in our current analyses. The following can be concluded:In total, ~23% (119 EJ) of the world’s total energy consumption originates from tribological contacts. Of that 20% (103 EJ) is used to overcome friction and 3% (16 EJ) is used to remanufacture worn parts and spare equipment due to wear and wear-related failures.By taking advantage of the new surface, materials, and lubrication technologies for friction reduction and wear protection in vehicles, machinery and other equipment worldwide, energy losses due to friction and wear could potentially be reduced by 40% in the long term (15 years)and by 18% in the short term (8 years). On global scale, these savings would amount to 1.4% of the GDP annually and 8.7% of the total energy consumption in the long term.The largest short term energy savings are envisioned in transportation (25%) and in the power generation (20%) while the potential savings in the manufacturing and residential sectors are estimated to be ~10%. In the longer terms, the savings would be 55%, 40%, 25%, and 20%, respectively.Implementing advanced tribological technologies can also reduce the CO 2 emissions globally by as much as 1,460 MtCO 2 and result in 450,000 million Euros cost savings in the short term. In the longer term, the reduction can be 3,140 MtCO 2 and the cost savings 970,000 million Euros. Fifty years ago, wear and wear-related failures were a major concern for UK industry and their mitigation was considered to be the major contributor to potential economic savings by as much as 95% in ten years by the development and deployment of new tribological solutions. The corresponding estimated savings are today still of the same orders but the calculated contribution to cost reduction is about 74% by friction reduction and to 26% from better wear protection. Overall, wear appears to be more critical than friction as it may result in catastrophic failures and operational breakdowns that can adversely impact productivity and hence cost.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)263-284
    Number of pages22
    JournalFriction
    Volume5
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Tribology
    Energy utilization
    Wear of materials
    Friction
    Costs
    Carbon Monoxide
    Power generation
    Economics
    Mineral industry
    Passenger cars
    Cost reduction
    Trucks
    Lubrication
    Machinery
    Energy dissipation
    Energy conservation
    Productivity

    Keywords

    • friction
    • wear
    • energy saving
    • emission reduction

    Cite this

    Holmberg, Kenneth ; Erdemir, Ali. / Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. In: Friction. 2017 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 263-284.
    @article{652c778f3ba54fa09d847ad46003345d,
    title = "Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions",
    abstract = "Calculations of the impact of friction and wear on energy consumption, economic expenditure, and CO 2 emissions are presented on a global scale. This impact study covers the four main energy consuming sectors: transportation, manufacturing, power generation, and residential. Previously published four case studies on passenger cars, trucks and buses, paper machines and the mining industry were included in our detailed calculations as reference data in our current analyses. The following can be concluded:In total, ~23{\%} (119 EJ) of the world’s total energy consumption originates from tribological contacts. Of that 20{\%} (103 EJ) is used to overcome friction and 3{\%} (16 EJ) is used to remanufacture worn parts and spare equipment due to wear and wear-related failures.By taking advantage of the new surface, materials, and lubrication technologies for friction reduction and wear protection in vehicles, machinery and other equipment worldwide, energy losses due to friction and wear could potentially be reduced by 40{\%} in the long term (15 years)and by 18{\%} in the short term (8 years). On global scale, these savings would amount to 1.4{\%} of the GDP annually and 8.7{\%} of the total energy consumption in the long term.The largest short term energy savings are envisioned in transportation (25{\%}) and in the power generation (20{\%}) while the potential savings in the manufacturing and residential sectors are estimated to be ~10{\%}. In the longer terms, the savings would be 55{\%}, 40{\%}, 25{\%}, and 20{\%}, respectively.Implementing advanced tribological technologies can also reduce the CO 2 emissions globally by as much as 1,460 MtCO 2 and result in 450,000 million Euros cost savings in the short term. In the longer term, the reduction can be 3,140 MtCO 2 and the cost savings 970,000 million Euros. Fifty years ago, wear and wear-related failures were a major concern for UK industry and their mitigation was considered to be the major contributor to potential economic savings by as much as 95{\%} in ten years by the development and deployment of new tribological solutions. The corresponding estimated savings are today still of the same orders but the calculated contribution to cost reduction is about 74{\%} by friction reduction and to 26{\%} from better wear protection. Overall, wear appears to be more critical than friction as it may result in catastrophic failures and operational breakdowns that can adversely impact productivity and hence cost.",
    keywords = "friction, wear, energy saving, emission reduction",
    author = "Kenneth Holmberg and Ali Erdemir",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1007/s40544-017-0183-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "263--284",
    journal = "Friction",
    issn = "2223-7690",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "3",

    }

    Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. / Holmberg, Kenneth (Corresponding Author); Erdemir, Ali.

    In: Friction, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2017, p. 263-284.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions

    AU - Holmberg, Kenneth

    AU - Erdemir, Ali

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Calculations of the impact of friction and wear on energy consumption, economic expenditure, and CO 2 emissions are presented on a global scale. This impact study covers the four main energy consuming sectors: transportation, manufacturing, power generation, and residential. Previously published four case studies on passenger cars, trucks and buses, paper machines and the mining industry were included in our detailed calculations as reference data in our current analyses. The following can be concluded:In total, ~23% (119 EJ) of the world’s total energy consumption originates from tribological contacts. Of that 20% (103 EJ) is used to overcome friction and 3% (16 EJ) is used to remanufacture worn parts and spare equipment due to wear and wear-related failures.By taking advantage of the new surface, materials, and lubrication technologies for friction reduction and wear protection in vehicles, machinery and other equipment worldwide, energy losses due to friction and wear could potentially be reduced by 40% in the long term (15 years)and by 18% in the short term (8 years). On global scale, these savings would amount to 1.4% of the GDP annually and 8.7% of the total energy consumption in the long term.The largest short term energy savings are envisioned in transportation (25%) and in the power generation (20%) while the potential savings in the manufacturing and residential sectors are estimated to be ~10%. In the longer terms, the savings would be 55%, 40%, 25%, and 20%, respectively.Implementing advanced tribological technologies can also reduce the CO 2 emissions globally by as much as 1,460 MtCO 2 and result in 450,000 million Euros cost savings in the short term. In the longer term, the reduction can be 3,140 MtCO 2 and the cost savings 970,000 million Euros. Fifty years ago, wear and wear-related failures were a major concern for UK industry and their mitigation was considered to be the major contributor to potential economic savings by as much as 95% in ten years by the development and deployment of new tribological solutions. The corresponding estimated savings are today still of the same orders but the calculated contribution to cost reduction is about 74% by friction reduction and to 26% from better wear protection. Overall, wear appears to be more critical than friction as it may result in catastrophic failures and operational breakdowns that can adversely impact productivity and hence cost.

    AB - Calculations of the impact of friction and wear on energy consumption, economic expenditure, and CO 2 emissions are presented on a global scale. This impact study covers the four main energy consuming sectors: transportation, manufacturing, power generation, and residential. Previously published four case studies on passenger cars, trucks and buses, paper machines and the mining industry were included in our detailed calculations as reference data in our current analyses. The following can be concluded:In total, ~23% (119 EJ) of the world’s total energy consumption originates from tribological contacts. Of that 20% (103 EJ) is used to overcome friction and 3% (16 EJ) is used to remanufacture worn parts and spare equipment due to wear and wear-related failures.By taking advantage of the new surface, materials, and lubrication technologies for friction reduction and wear protection in vehicles, machinery and other equipment worldwide, energy losses due to friction and wear could potentially be reduced by 40% in the long term (15 years)and by 18% in the short term (8 years). On global scale, these savings would amount to 1.4% of the GDP annually and 8.7% of the total energy consumption in the long term.The largest short term energy savings are envisioned in transportation (25%) and in the power generation (20%) while the potential savings in the manufacturing and residential sectors are estimated to be ~10%. In the longer terms, the savings would be 55%, 40%, 25%, and 20%, respectively.Implementing advanced tribological technologies can also reduce the CO 2 emissions globally by as much as 1,460 MtCO 2 and result in 450,000 million Euros cost savings in the short term. In the longer term, the reduction can be 3,140 MtCO 2 and the cost savings 970,000 million Euros. Fifty years ago, wear and wear-related failures were a major concern for UK industry and their mitigation was considered to be the major contributor to potential economic savings by as much as 95% in ten years by the development and deployment of new tribological solutions. The corresponding estimated savings are today still of the same orders but the calculated contribution to cost reduction is about 74% by friction reduction and to 26% from better wear protection. Overall, wear appears to be more critical than friction as it may result in catastrophic failures and operational breakdowns that can adversely impact productivity and hence cost.

    KW - friction

    KW - wear

    KW - energy saving

    KW - emission reduction

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029144747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s40544-017-0183-5

    DO - 10.1007/s40544-017-0183-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 263

    EP - 284

    JO - Friction

    JF - Friction

    SN - 2223-7690

    IS - 3

    ER -