Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects

Tapio Koivu, Sampo Tukiainen, Johanna Nummelin, Brian Atkin, Risto Tainio

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    Abstract

    This report is of the findings of a project that aims at understanding the effect of institutional and cultural differences to outcomes of global projects. The aim of this research is to model institutional complexity in global projects accurately enough that one can predict their impact on the project performance, build tools and procedures for project managers for predicting project performance, managing risks and creating better foundations for improved project performance. It is a complex endeavor to start gaining understanding from global projects, creating a theory that applies to a range of practical solutions and giving predictably to project managers without being impractical. This has to begin by describing the chain of phenomena from the outcomes backwards toward the inception of a project. After this chain has been thoroughly characterized, researchers can begin the second stage, which is to classify the phenomenon into categories. In the third stage, researchers articulate a theory that asserts what causes the phenomenon to occur, and why. The scope of the research was intentionally limited to a sub-set of institutional complexity in this first phase. We chose to collect data from cultural differences in projects. The first hypothesis was that cultural differences are likely to have an effect on project performance and coordination. At this stage, the correlation between, for example, most commonly used dimensions of culture and performance was not understood thoroughly enough to actually model any behavior. However, a basic framework for categorizing the basic phenomena was found. Altogether seven case studies were conducted concerning global projects executed by Kone Oyj, Foster Wheeler Energia Oy and LT Consultants Ltd. These case study projects provided a basis that can be described as the Finnish project management culture. As we recognized to follow the basic thinking that every project and encounter is context specific, one could come up with dozens of different sets of attributes depending on the projects studied. This one is one of many alternatives and might be typical to the company, persons and professions. After identifying some of the main characteristics of Finnish project management culture encountering, and in some situations colliding with more than 10 European and Middle East project management cultures, the following main conclusions are presented concerning the mechanisms affecting in these encounters: - Decisive is not the "size" of the differences between the cultures rather than the situational match/mismatch between the differences - The nature of previous encounters define some of the nature of future encounters - Situational adaptation of one party reduces the need for adaptation of the other party Based on these observations we recommend the following: 1. Acquire local institutional knowledge as much as possible and as early as possible. 2. Cooperate and utilize knowledge of local partners who have the right connections to right people and authorities and who know the correct way of working with them. 3. Practice self-reflection. 4. Pay attention to situational characteristics and not so much to the stereotypes of national cultural differences. Further empirical data from these two groups of variables should be generated by conducting more case studies with systematic way of documenting all dependencies between the variables and project performance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationEspoo
    PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
    Number of pages62
    ISBN (Electronic)951-38-6565-7
    Publication statusPublished - 2004
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Publication series

    SeriesVTT Working Papers
    Number14

    Fingerprint

    Global projects
    Project performance
    Institutional complexity
    Cultural differences
    Project management
    Management culture
    Project manager
    Self-reflection
    Authority
    Empirical data
    Middle East
    Consultants
    Stereotypes
    Institutional differences
    Mismatch

    Keywords

    • institutions
    • cultures
    • project management

    Cite this

    Koivu, T., Tukiainen, S., Nummelin, J., Atkin, B., & Tainio, R. (2004). Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Working Papers, No. 14
    Koivu, Tapio ; Tukiainen, Sampo ; Nummelin, Johanna ; Atkin, Brian ; Tainio, Risto. / Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 62 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 14).
    @book{2119cf396fd0406e8d08b1af31a03008,
    title = "Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects",
    abstract = "This report is of the findings of a project that aims at understanding the effect of institutional and cultural differences to outcomes of global projects. The aim of this research is to model institutional complexity in global projects accurately enough that one can predict their impact on the project performance, build tools and procedures for project managers for predicting project performance, managing risks and creating better foundations for improved project performance. It is a complex endeavor to start gaining understanding from global projects, creating a theory that applies to a range of practical solutions and giving predictably to project managers without being impractical. This has to begin by describing the chain of phenomena from the outcomes backwards toward the inception of a project. After this chain has been thoroughly characterized, researchers can begin the second stage, which is to classify the phenomenon into categories. In the third stage, researchers articulate a theory that asserts what causes the phenomenon to occur, and why. The scope of the research was intentionally limited to a sub-set of institutional complexity in this first phase. We chose to collect data from cultural differences in projects. The first hypothesis was that cultural differences are likely to have an effect on project performance and coordination. At this stage, the correlation between, for example, most commonly used dimensions of culture and performance was not understood thoroughly enough to actually model any behavior. However, a basic framework for categorizing the basic phenomena was found. Altogether seven case studies were conducted concerning global projects executed by Kone Oyj, Foster Wheeler Energia Oy and LT Consultants Ltd. These case study projects provided a basis that can be described as the Finnish project management culture. As we recognized to follow the basic thinking that every project and encounter is context specific, one could come up with dozens of different sets of attributes depending on the projects studied. This one is one of many alternatives and might be typical to the company, persons and professions. After identifying some of the main characteristics of Finnish project management culture encountering, and in some situations colliding with more than 10 European and Middle East project management cultures, the following main conclusions are presented concerning the mechanisms affecting in these encounters: - Decisive is not the {"}size{"} of the differences between the cultures rather than the situational match/mismatch between the differences - The nature of previous encounters define some of the nature of future encounters - Situational adaptation of one party reduces the need for adaptation of the other party Based on these observations we recommend the following: 1. Acquire local institutional knowledge as much as possible and as early as possible. 2. Cooperate and utilize knowledge of local partners who have the right connections to right people and authorities and who know the correct way of working with them. 3. Practice self-reflection. 4. Pay attention to situational characteristics and not so much to the stereotypes of national cultural differences. Further empirical data from these two groups of variables should be generated by conducting more case studies with systematic way of documenting all dependencies between the variables and project performance.",
    keywords = "institutions, cultures, project management",
    author = "Tapio Koivu and Sampo Tukiainen and Johanna Nummelin and Brian Atkin and Risto Tainio",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    series = "VTT Working Papers",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "14",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    Koivu, T, Tukiainen, S, Nummelin, J, Atkin, B & Tainio, R 2004, Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. VTT Working Papers, no. 14, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

    Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. / Koivu, Tapio; Tukiainen, Sampo; Nummelin, Johanna; Atkin, Brian; Tainio, Risto.

    Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 62 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 14).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects

    AU - Koivu, Tapio

    AU - Tukiainen, Sampo

    AU - Nummelin, Johanna

    AU - Atkin, Brian

    AU - Tainio, Risto

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - This report is of the findings of a project that aims at understanding the effect of institutional and cultural differences to outcomes of global projects. The aim of this research is to model institutional complexity in global projects accurately enough that one can predict their impact on the project performance, build tools and procedures for project managers for predicting project performance, managing risks and creating better foundations for improved project performance. It is a complex endeavor to start gaining understanding from global projects, creating a theory that applies to a range of practical solutions and giving predictably to project managers without being impractical. This has to begin by describing the chain of phenomena from the outcomes backwards toward the inception of a project. After this chain has been thoroughly characterized, researchers can begin the second stage, which is to classify the phenomenon into categories. In the third stage, researchers articulate a theory that asserts what causes the phenomenon to occur, and why. The scope of the research was intentionally limited to a sub-set of institutional complexity in this first phase. We chose to collect data from cultural differences in projects. The first hypothesis was that cultural differences are likely to have an effect on project performance and coordination. At this stage, the correlation between, for example, most commonly used dimensions of culture and performance was not understood thoroughly enough to actually model any behavior. However, a basic framework for categorizing the basic phenomena was found. Altogether seven case studies were conducted concerning global projects executed by Kone Oyj, Foster Wheeler Energia Oy and LT Consultants Ltd. These case study projects provided a basis that can be described as the Finnish project management culture. As we recognized to follow the basic thinking that every project and encounter is context specific, one could come up with dozens of different sets of attributes depending on the projects studied. This one is one of many alternatives and might be typical to the company, persons and professions. After identifying some of the main characteristics of Finnish project management culture encountering, and in some situations colliding with more than 10 European and Middle East project management cultures, the following main conclusions are presented concerning the mechanisms affecting in these encounters: - Decisive is not the "size" of the differences between the cultures rather than the situational match/mismatch between the differences - The nature of previous encounters define some of the nature of future encounters - Situational adaptation of one party reduces the need for adaptation of the other party Based on these observations we recommend the following: 1. Acquire local institutional knowledge as much as possible and as early as possible. 2. Cooperate and utilize knowledge of local partners who have the right connections to right people and authorities and who know the correct way of working with them. 3. Practice self-reflection. 4. Pay attention to situational characteristics and not so much to the stereotypes of national cultural differences. Further empirical data from these two groups of variables should be generated by conducting more case studies with systematic way of documenting all dependencies between the variables and project performance.

    AB - This report is of the findings of a project that aims at understanding the effect of institutional and cultural differences to outcomes of global projects. The aim of this research is to model institutional complexity in global projects accurately enough that one can predict their impact on the project performance, build tools and procedures for project managers for predicting project performance, managing risks and creating better foundations for improved project performance. It is a complex endeavor to start gaining understanding from global projects, creating a theory that applies to a range of practical solutions and giving predictably to project managers without being impractical. This has to begin by describing the chain of phenomena from the outcomes backwards toward the inception of a project. After this chain has been thoroughly characterized, researchers can begin the second stage, which is to classify the phenomenon into categories. In the third stage, researchers articulate a theory that asserts what causes the phenomenon to occur, and why. The scope of the research was intentionally limited to a sub-set of institutional complexity in this first phase. We chose to collect data from cultural differences in projects. The first hypothesis was that cultural differences are likely to have an effect on project performance and coordination. At this stage, the correlation between, for example, most commonly used dimensions of culture and performance was not understood thoroughly enough to actually model any behavior. However, a basic framework for categorizing the basic phenomena was found. Altogether seven case studies were conducted concerning global projects executed by Kone Oyj, Foster Wheeler Energia Oy and LT Consultants Ltd. These case study projects provided a basis that can be described as the Finnish project management culture. As we recognized to follow the basic thinking that every project and encounter is context specific, one could come up with dozens of different sets of attributes depending on the projects studied. This one is one of many alternatives and might be typical to the company, persons and professions. After identifying some of the main characteristics of Finnish project management culture encountering, and in some situations colliding with more than 10 European and Middle East project management cultures, the following main conclusions are presented concerning the mechanisms affecting in these encounters: - Decisive is not the "size" of the differences between the cultures rather than the situational match/mismatch between the differences - The nature of previous encounters define some of the nature of future encounters - Situational adaptation of one party reduces the need for adaptation of the other party Based on these observations we recommend the following: 1. Acquire local institutional knowledge as much as possible and as early as possible. 2. Cooperate and utilize knowledge of local partners who have the right connections to right people and authorities and who know the correct way of working with them. 3. Practice self-reflection. 4. Pay attention to situational characteristics and not so much to the stereotypes of national cultural differences. Further empirical data from these two groups of variables should be generated by conducting more case studies with systematic way of documenting all dependencies between the variables and project performance.

    KW - institutions

    KW - cultures

    KW - project management

    M3 - Report

    T3 - VTT Working Papers

    BT - Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    CY - Espoo

    ER -

    Koivu T, Tukiainen S, Nummelin J, Atkin B, Tainio R. Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004. 62 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 14).