Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integration of green and turquoise hydrogen for blast furnace injection and power-to-X fuel production under EU renewable fuel regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Hard–to–abate industrial sectors such as fuel production and the iron and steel industry rely heavily on fossil carbon feedstocks and are major contributors to global greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions. Although hydrogen–based direct reduced iron routes offer deep long–term abatement for iron and steel, their high capital intensity creates a need for transitional options that enable earlier hydrogen deployment at lower risk. This study assesses direct hydrogen injection into existing blast furnaces (BF) and assesses whether combining renewable electrolytic (“green”) hydrogen with low–carbon methane–derived (“turquoise”) hydrogen within an integrated Hydrogen Valley can reduce system costs and renewable overcapacity while preserving substantial emission reductions. To assess this, a dynamic techno–economic Power–to–X optimisation model is applied to a 6,600 t hot metal day−1 BF steel mill integrated into a gigawatt–scale industrial Hydrogen Valley in Northern Finland, explicitly representing electricity markets, hydrogen production, storage and transport, and regulatory constraints for Renewable Fuels of Non–Biological Origin (RFNBO). Supplying a constant BF hydrogen demand of 7.65 tH2 h−1 using only green hydrogen requires 380–430 MW of electrolyser capacity and 1,000–1,500 MW of wind power, resulting in hydrogen costs of €3.6–3.7 kgH2−1, whereas integrating turquoise hydrogen improves system flexibility and reduces renewable overcapacity, and lowers hydrogen costs to €2.6–3.4 kgH2−1; however, future RFNBO quota requirements lower asset utilisation and increase costs to €2.9–3.7 kgH2−1. Across all scenarios, GHG emissions decrease by approximately 20–21% per tonne of hot metal. Overall, hydrogen injection into existing BFs appears to be a cost–effective transitional pathway that supports early hydrogen infrastructure build–up while enabling meaningful near-term emission reductions and long–term progress toward fossil–free steel production.
Original languageEnglish
Article number121835
JournalEnergy Conversion and Management
Volume366
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2026
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This research was carried out in the FFS2 – Towards Fossil Free Steel Phase 2 public research project (Dnro 5667/31/2023), with funding from Business Finland, VTT and company partners.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Green hydrogen
  • Hydrogen valleys
  • LCOH
  • P2X
  • Steel decarbonisation
  • Turquoise hydrogen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integration of green and turquoise hydrogen for blast furnace injection and power-to-X fuel production under EU renewable fuel regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this