Intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes in research institutes in Northern Europe

Jeremias Seppä, Virpi Korpelainen, Sten Bergstrand, Helge Karlsson, Lauri Lillepea, Antti Lassila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and atomic force microscopes (AFM) in various research laboratories in Northern Europe was organized by the local national metrology institutes. In this paper are presented the results of the comparison, with also an example uncertainty budget for AFM grating pitch measurement. Grating samples (1D) were circulated among the participating laboratories. The participating laboratories were also asked about the calibration of their instruments. The accuracy of the uncertainty estimates seemed to vary largely between the laboratories, and for some laboratories the appropriateness of the calibration procedures could be considered. Several institutes (60% of all results in terms of En value) also had good comprehension of their measurement capability. The average difference from reference value was 6.7 and 10.0 nm for calibrated instruments and 20.6 and 39.9 nm for uncalibrated instruments for 300 nm and 700 nm gratings, respectively. The correlation of the results for both nominally 300 and 700 nm gratings shows that a simple scale factor calibration would have corrected a large part of the deviations from the reference values.

Original languageEnglish
Article number044013
JournalMeasurement Science and Technology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Atomic Force Microscope
Scanning Electron Microscope
Gratings
Lateral
Microscopes
Electron microscopes
electron microscopes
microscopes
Scanning
Calibration
scanning
gratings
Uncertainty
Scale factor
Research laboratories
Metrology
Deviation
budgets
metrology
Vary

Keywords

  • scanning electron microscopes
  • atomic force microscopes
  • comparison
  • scale
  • calibration

Cite this

@article{7cc316776265434dab42a00c86258f44,
title = "Intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes in research institutes in Northern Europe",
abstract = "An intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and atomic force microscopes (AFM) in various research laboratories in Northern Europe was organized by the local national metrology institutes. In this paper are presented the results of the comparison, with also an example uncertainty budget for AFM grating pitch measurement. Grating samples (1D) were circulated among the participating laboratories. The participating laboratories were also asked about the calibration of their instruments. The accuracy of the uncertainty estimates seemed to vary largely between the laboratories, and for some laboratories the appropriateness of the calibration procedures could be considered. Several institutes (60{\%} of all results in terms of En value) also had good comprehension of their measurement capability. The average difference from reference value was 6.7 and 10.0 nm for calibrated instruments and 20.6 and 39.9 nm for uncalibrated instruments for 300 nm and 700 nm gratings, respectively. The correlation of the results for both nominally 300 and 700 nm gratings shows that a simple scale factor calibration would have corrected a large part of the deviations from the reference values.",
keywords = "scanning electron microscopes, atomic force microscopes, comparison, scale, calibration",
author = "Jeremias Sepp{\"a} and Virpi Korpelainen and Sten Bergstrand and Helge Karlsson and Lauri Lillepea and Antti Lassila",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/0957-0233/25/4/044013",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
journal = "Measurement Science and Technology",
issn = "0957-0233",
publisher = "Institute of Physics IOP",
number = "4",

}

Intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes in research institutes in Northern Europe. / Seppä, Jeremias; Korpelainen, Virpi; Bergstrand, Sten; Karlsson, Helge; Lillepea, Lauri; Lassila, Antti.

In: Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 044013, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes in research institutes in Northern Europe

AU - Seppä, Jeremias

AU - Korpelainen, Virpi

AU - Bergstrand, Sten

AU - Karlsson, Helge

AU - Lillepea, Lauri

AU - Lassila, Antti

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - An intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and atomic force microscopes (AFM) in various research laboratories in Northern Europe was organized by the local national metrology institutes. In this paper are presented the results of the comparison, with also an example uncertainty budget for AFM grating pitch measurement. Grating samples (1D) were circulated among the participating laboratories. The participating laboratories were also asked about the calibration of their instruments. The accuracy of the uncertainty estimates seemed to vary largely between the laboratories, and for some laboratories the appropriateness of the calibration procedures could be considered. Several institutes (60% of all results in terms of En value) also had good comprehension of their measurement capability. The average difference from reference value was 6.7 and 10.0 nm for calibrated instruments and 20.6 and 39.9 nm for uncalibrated instruments for 300 nm and 700 nm gratings, respectively. The correlation of the results for both nominally 300 and 700 nm gratings shows that a simple scale factor calibration would have corrected a large part of the deviations from the reference values.

AB - An intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and atomic force microscopes (AFM) in various research laboratories in Northern Europe was organized by the local national metrology institutes. In this paper are presented the results of the comparison, with also an example uncertainty budget for AFM grating pitch measurement. Grating samples (1D) were circulated among the participating laboratories. The participating laboratories were also asked about the calibration of their instruments. The accuracy of the uncertainty estimates seemed to vary largely between the laboratories, and for some laboratories the appropriateness of the calibration procedures could be considered. Several institutes (60% of all results in terms of En value) also had good comprehension of their measurement capability. The average difference from reference value was 6.7 and 10.0 nm for calibrated instruments and 20.6 and 39.9 nm for uncalibrated instruments for 300 nm and 700 nm gratings, respectively. The correlation of the results for both nominally 300 and 700 nm gratings shows that a simple scale factor calibration would have corrected a large part of the deviations from the reference values.

KW - scanning electron microscopes

KW - atomic force microscopes

KW - comparison

KW - scale

KW - calibration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896778155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0957-0233/25/4/044013

DO - 10.1088/0957-0233/25/4/044013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896778155

VL - 25

JO - Measurement Science and Technology

JF - Measurement Science and Technology

SN - 0957-0233

IS - 4

M1 - 044013

ER -