Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International fuel performance study of fresh fuel experiments for PCMI effects during RIA experiments

  • Seokbin Seo*
  • , Charles Folsom
  • , Colby Jensen
  • , David Kamerman
  • , Luana Giaccardi
  • , Marco Cherubini
  • , Pavel Suk
  • , Martin Sevecek
  • , Jerome Sercombe
  • , Isabelle Guenot-Delahaie
  • , Alessandro Scolaro
  • , Matthieu Reymond
  • , Katalin Kulacsy
  • , Luis Herranz
  • , Francisco Feria
  • , Pau Aragón
  • , Grigori Khvostov
  • , Imran Khan
  • , Anuj Kumar Deo
  • , Srinivasa Rao Ravva
  • Rolando Calabrese, Felix Boldt, Jonathan Sappl, Florian Falk, Asko Arkoma, Georgenthum Vincent, Yudai Tasaki, Kazuo Kakiuchi, Yutaka Udagawa, Gregory Delipei, Charles Cheron, James Corson, Jinzhao Zhang, Thomas Drieu, Jan Klouzal, Martin Dostal, Vitezslav Matocha, Tereza Kinkorová, Carlo Fiorina
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents the results of High-burnup Experiments for Reactivity-initiated Accident (HERA) Modeling & Simulation (M&S) exercise. The HERA project under the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) program is focused on studying Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel behavior during Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) conditions. The Part I M&S cases are based on a series of tests in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility in the United States and the Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) in Japan. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the test design to accomplish its goals in establishing clearer understanding of the effects of power pulse width during RIA conditions. The blind predictions using various computational tools have been performed and compared amongst to interpret the behaviors of high burnup fuels during RIA. While many international participants evaluate the thermal–mechanical behavior of fuel rod under different conditions, a considerable scatter of outputs comes out for the cases due to the disparity between codes in predicting mechanical behaviors. In general, however, the results of thermal–mechanical analysis elaborate that nominal design conditions the shorter pulse width tests in NSRR should cause cladding failures while the TREAT tests appear to have more split prediction of failure or not. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis varying key testing parameters reveals the considerable effect of power pulse width and total energy deposition on prediction of fuel rod failure.
Original languageEnglish
Article number113673
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume430
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This manuscript has been authored by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The authors are grateful to the contribution of Michelle Bales and other NEA staffs managing the project. This research made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517.

Keywords

  • PCMI
  • Fuel
  • RIA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International fuel performance study of fresh fuel experiments for PCMI effects during RIA experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this