TY - BOOK
T1 - Interpretation of sea ice using NOAA-AVHRR data
AU - Ahlnäs, Kristina
AU - Kuittinen, Risto
AU - Parmes, Eija
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - The different channels of the NOAA-AVHRR (National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration-Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer) satellites were
studied to determine the best single channel and
channel combinations to
use in distinguishing between clouds, sea-ice types
and open water. The
study area was situated in the Bay of Bothnia, the
northernmost part of the
Baltic Sea, in the winter of 1987. The best channel
combination for cloud
separation was 124/RGB (Red Green Blue) making
clouds bright yellow and
open water blue. This combination worked well from
mid-February through
May. However, when available, as in NOAA-9, Ch
125/RGB was a better choice
than Ch 124/RGB. Leads and open water could be seen
in channel 5 but not in
channel 4. The near IR channel 2, in combination
with one thermal IR
channel, 4 or 5, was also sufficient to separate
clouds from ice. Image
enhancement by exponential and logarithmic functions
improved the
interpretation of the image.
Numerical interpretation with spectral and textural
information of NOAA
images was used to interpret clouds, water and
sea-ice types. In this task
contrast and entropy were used as textural
parameters. Supervised and
unsupervised methods were used in classification.
The results showed that
water, open ice, close ice and partly ridged as well
as fast ice can be
discriminated although discriminating between fast
ice and clouds as well
as fast ice and ridges is difficult. Entropy was a
better textural
parameter than contrast but an algorithm has to be
developed to make the
interpretation faster.
AB - The different channels of the NOAA-AVHRR (National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration-Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer) satellites were
studied to determine the best single channel and
channel combinations to
use in distinguishing between clouds, sea-ice types
and open water. The
study area was situated in the Bay of Bothnia, the
northernmost part of the
Baltic Sea, in the winter of 1987. The best channel
combination for cloud
separation was 124/RGB (Red Green Blue) making
clouds bright yellow and
open water blue. This combination worked well from
mid-February through
May. However, when available, as in NOAA-9, Ch
125/RGB was a better choice
than Ch 124/RGB. Leads and open water could be seen
in channel 5 but not in
channel 4. The near IR channel 2, in combination
with one thermal IR
channel, 4 or 5, was also sufficient to separate
clouds from ice. Image
enhancement by exponential and logarithmic functions
improved the
interpretation of the image.
Numerical interpretation with spectral and textural
information of NOAA
images was used to interpret clouds, water and
sea-ice types. In this task
contrast and entropy were used as textural
parameters. Supervised and
unsupervised methods were used in classification.
The results showed that
water, open ice, close ice and partly ridged as well
as fast ice can be
discriminated although discriminating between fast
ice and clouds as well
as fast ice and ridges is difficult. Entropy was a
better textural
parameter than contrast but an algorithm has to be
developed to make the
interpretation faster.
KW - seawater
KW - clouds (meteorology)
KW - ice forecasting
KW - satellite images
KW - interpretation
KW - recognition
M3 - Report
SN - 951-38-3805-6
T3 - Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita
BT - Interpretation of sea ice using NOAA-AVHRR data
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
ER -