TY - BOOK
T1 - Issues in open EDI
AU - Veijalainen, Jari
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is gaining more and
more importance in
business
and administration, as big savings are in sight. In this
report, diverse
aspects of
autonomy are first identified and analysed. It is made
plausible that autonomy
is the key
issue in the EDI environment. Based on this observation,
an examination is made
of
how the work within EDI environments must be organized
and how an EDI systems
architecture should look. The focus is on the integration
of EDI into business
applications and on the Open EDI ideas put forward by the
special working group
on
EDI at ISO, SWG-EDI. It is shown that the globally and
locally controlled
domains
must be separated from each other both conceptually and
in reality. The way
these
separately controlled domains are reconciled is crucial
from the autonomy-
preservation point of view. A tentative reference
architecture, the need for
which was
identified by the working group, is also suggested. One
conclusion below is
that there
should be two reference models, rather than only one.
They are called the
Communication Reference Model, and the Systems Reference
Architecture. They
point
out the places where integration could happen and how it
should be done. It is
further
suggested that the future standardization work should
include automatic
scenario
development tools, like a machine-executable scenario
language, which would be
supported by Open EDI systems.
AB - Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is gaining more and
more importance in
business
and administration, as big savings are in sight. In this
report, diverse
aspects of
autonomy are first identified and analysed. It is made
plausible that autonomy
is the key
issue in the EDI environment. Based on this observation,
an examination is made
of
how the work within EDI environments must be organized
and how an EDI systems
architecture should look. The focus is on the integration
of EDI into business
applications and on the Open EDI ideas put forward by the
special working group
on
EDI at ISO, SWG-EDI. It is shown that the globally and
locally controlled
domains
must be separated from each other both conceptually and
in reality. The way
these
separately controlled domains are reconciled is crucial
from the autonomy-
preservation point of view. A tentative reference
architecture, the need for
which was
identified by the working group, is also suggested. One
conclusion below is
that there
should be two reference models, rather than only one.
They are called the
Communication Reference Model, and the Systems Reference
Architecture. They
point
out the places where integration could happen and how it
should be done. It is
further
suggested that the future standardization work should
include automatic
scenario
development tools, like a machine-executable scenario
language, which would be
supported by Open EDI systems.
KW - electronic data interchange
KW - computer systems architecture
KW - open systems interconnection
KW - autonomy
KW - communication
M3 - Report
SN - 951-38-4055-7
T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes
BT - Issues in open EDI
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
ER -