Jätevesilietteen energiatehokas käsittely termofiilisesti mädättämällä

Elina Merta, Ari Kangas, Mona Arnold, Charlotta Lund, Risto Saarinen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The goal of the project was to improve the utilization of sludge in a cost-efficient manner. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAD) is an option to improve the energy efficiency of sewage sludge due to potentially higher biogas yield. TAD also offers other advantages over mesophilic process such as reduction in sludge volume and better hygienic properties of the treated sludge and thus better potential for agricultural utilization. The experimental part of the project focused on the modification of anaerobic digestion process from mesophilic to thermophilic. The aim was to investigate and compare the biogas yield and quality, process loadability, digestate and reject water properties and digestor material durability in the two processes. Basic data on anaerobic digestion was gathered in comparative pilot scale experiments. Loading tests were carried out to determine the maximum loading rate of the digestion processes. In the first set of loading tests, the TAD process produced more biogas than the MAD process. The average total biogas production and unit production in TAD were as high as 1.3 times those of MAD. The biogas unit production started to decrease when the retention time was shorter than 17 (TAD) or 15 (MAD) days. In the second set of loading tests, thickened sludge was let to hydrolyse for ca. two days and the formation of gas bubbles caused flotation. This procedure more than tripled the biogas unit production compared to previous test set, but now both TAD and MAD processes produced similar amounts of methane. Biogas methane content was similar in both reactors throughout the pilot runs. However, the elevated temperature caused increased siloxane concentrations in the gas phase. Also the sulphur concentration in TAD was higher than in MAD. Overall, the sulphur content of the biogas was low in both processes. TAD process hygienized the sludge when the retention time was > 15 days. According to CST measurements (Capillary Suction Time), dewatering properties of thermophilic sludge were inferior and the reject water contained more NH4+-N and CODCr compared to mesophilic sludge. Thermophilic sludge was times more odorous and more volatile organic compounds were released from it. Reactor material tests indicated that thermophilic process caused slightly more corrosion in stainless steel. However, no significant differences between the two processes were observed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe 12th Nordic/NORDIWA Wastewater conference, Conference book
    Place of PublicationHelsinki
    Pages299-308
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    Event12th Nordic Wastewater Conference - Helsinki, Finland
    Duration: 14 Nov 201116 Nov 2011
    Conference number: 12

    Conference

    Conference12th Nordic Wastewater Conference
    CountryFinland
    CityHelsinki
    Period14/11/1116/11/11

    Keywords

    • Sludge
    • digestion
    • thermophilic
    • biogas
    • trace compounds

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Jätevesilietteen energiatehokas käsittely termofiilisesti mädättämällä'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this