Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost

Sami Lallukka; Pertti Raatikainen

doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638

Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optical transmission is getting more popular in the access network due to the increasing demand for bandwidth. The most advertised transport solutions for the optical access are Ethernet based PON (EPON) and Gigabit-capable PON (GPON), and the problem is which one to choose when establishing a new access network. This paper studies the network cost of EPON and GPON and bases the comparison on the link utilization.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference 2005, Globecom'05
Publisher	IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Pages	GC09-4
ISBN (Electronic)	0-7803-9415-1
ISBN (Print)	0-7803-9414-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638
Publication status	Published - 2006
MoE publication type	A4 Article in a conference publication

Keywords

PON
EPON
GPON
utilization of transport capacity
network cost

Access to Document

10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638

Cite this

@inproceedings{aa8997d8e8b943d296c2198d08be2fdd,

title = "Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost",

abstract = "Optical transmission is getting more popular in the access network due to the increasing demand for bandwidth. The most advertised transport solutions for the optical access are Ethernet based PON (EPON) and Gigabit-capable PON (GPON), and the problem is which one to choose when establishing a new access network. This paper studies the network cost of EPON and GPON and bases the comparison on the link utilization.",

keywords = "PON, EPON, GPON, utilization of transport capacity, network cost",

author = "Sami Lallukka and Pertti Raatikainen",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638",

language = "English",

isbn = "0-7803-9414-3",

pages = "GC09--4",

booktitle = "IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference 2005, Globecom'05",

publisher = "IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers",

address = "United States",

}

Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost. / Lallukka, Sami; Raatikainen, Pertti.

IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference 2005, Globecom'05. IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 2006. p. GC09-4.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost

AU - Lallukka, Sami

AU - Raatikainen, Pertti

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Optical transmission is getting more popular in the access network due to the increasing demand for bandwidth. The most advertised transport solutions for the optical access are Ethernet based PON (EPON) and Gigabit-capable PON (GPON), and the problem is which one to choose when establishing a new access network. This paper studies the network cost of EPON and GPON and bases the comparison on the link utilization.

AB - Optical transmission is getting more popular in the access network due to the increasing demand for bandwidth. The most advertised transport solutions for the optical access are Ethernet based PON (EPON) and Gigabit-capable PON (GPON), and the problem is which one to choose when establishing a new access network. This paper studies the network cost of EPON and GPON and bases the comparison on the link utilization.

KW - PON

KW - EPON

KW - GPON

KW - utilization of transport capacity

KW - network cost

U2 - 10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638

DO - 10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1577638

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 0-7803-9414-3

SP - GC09-4

BT - IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference 2005, Globecom'05

PB - IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers

ER -

Link utilization and comparison of EPON and GPON access network cost

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this