Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery

Pertti Lahdenperä (Corresponding Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    169 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Collaborative construction project arrangements have been the subject of many development efforts owing to the frustration felt toward the opportunism inherent in traditional contracting. Globally, three approaches have stood out: project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. These so-called relational project delivery arrangements have much in common. This study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between the arrangements by examining their key concepts and features one by one and in relation to each other; the motivation behind each is also examined. Early involvement of key parties, transparent financials, shared risk and reward, joint decision-making, and a collaborative multi-party agreement are some of the features incorporated in all the arrangements to a varying degree. Beyond the numerous details, divergent applications and constant evolution presented, the study also recognizes project alliancing as a project delivery system in its own right due to its contractual structure that integrated project delivery aims to imitate while introducing some management approaches not included in project alliancing. Project partnering, although developed in leaps and bounds since its introduction, takes a more conservative approach to work scope and liabilities. Similarly, project alliancing takes relational contracting to the extreme compared to the current forms of integrated project delivery and, especially, project partnering.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-79
    Number of pages22
    JournalConstruction Management and Economics
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Decision making
    Sensemaking
    Project delivery
    Integrated
    Partnering

    Keywords

    • Alliancing
    • comparison
    • integrated project delivery
    • partnering
    • relational contracting

    Cite this

    @article{167041c3fff04159a4fe3b6a29a773b2,
    title = "Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery",
    abstract = "Collaborative construction project arrangements have been the subject of many development efforts owing to the frustration felt toward the opportunism inherent in traditional contracting. Globally, three approaches have stood out: project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. These so-called relational project delivery arrangements have much in common. This study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between the arrangements by examining their key concepts and features one by one and in relation to each other; the motivation behind each is also examined. Early involvement of key parties, transparent financials, shared risk and reward, joint decision-making, and a collaborative multi-party agreement are some of the features incorporated in all the arrangements to a varying degree. Beyond the numerous details, divergent applications and constant evolution presented, the study also recognizes project alliancing as a project delivery system in its own right due to its contractual structure that integrated project delivery aims to imitate while introducing some management approaches not included in project alliancing. Project partnering, although developed in leaps and bounds since its introduction, takes a more conservative approach to work scope and liabilities. Similarly, project alliancing takes relational contracting to the extreme compared to the current forms of integrated project delivery and, especially, project partnering.",
    keywords = "Alliancing, comparison, integrated project delivery, partnering, relational contracting",
    author = "Pertti Lahdenper{\"a}",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/01446193.2011.648947",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "57--79",
    journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
    issn = "0144-6193",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery

    AU - Lahdenperä, Pertti

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Collaborative construction project arrangements have been the subject of many development efforts owing to the frustration felt toward the opportunism inherent in traditional contracting. Globally, three approaches have stood out: project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. These so-called relational project delivery arrangements have much in common. This study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between the arrangements by examining their key concepts and features one by one and in relation to each other; the motivation behind each is also examined. Early involvement of key parties, transparent financials, shared risk and reward, joint decision-making, and a collaborative multi-party agreement are some of the features incorporated in all the arrangements to a varying degree. Beyond the numerous details, divergent applications and constant evolution presented, the study also recognizes project alliancing as a project delivery system in its own right due to its contractual structure that integrated project delivery aims to imitate while introducing some management approaches not included in project alliancing. Project partnering, although developed in leaps and bounds since its introduction, takes a more conservative approach to work scope and liabilities. Similarly, project alliancing takes relational contracting to the extreme compared to the current forms of integrated project delivery and, especially, project partnering.

    AB - Collaborative construction project arrangements have been the subject of many development efforts owing to the frustration felt toward the opportunism inherent in traditional contracting. Globally, three approaches have stood out: project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. These so-called relational project delivery arrangements have much in common. This study aims to clarify the similarities and differences between the arrangements by examining their key concepts and features one by one and in relation to each other; the motivation behind each is also examined. Early involvement of key parties, transparent financials, shared risk and reward, joint decision-making, and a collaborative multi-party agreement are some of the features incorporated in all the arrangements to a varying degree. Beyond the numerous details, divergent applications and constant evolution presented, the study also recognizes project alliancing as a project delivery system in its own right due to its contractual structure that integrated project delivery aims to imitate while introducing some management approaches not included in project alliancing. Project partnering, although developed in leaps and bounds since its introduction, takes a more conservative approach to work scope and liabilities. Similarly, project alliancing takes relational contracting to the extreme compared to the current forms of integrated project delivery and, especially, project partnering.

    KW - Alliancing

    KW - comparison

    KW - integrated project delivery

    KW - partnering

    KW - relational contracting

    U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2011.648947

    DO - 10.1080/01446193.2011.648947

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 57

    EP - 79

    JO - Construction Management and Economics

    JF - Construction Management and Economics

    SN - 0144-6193

    IS - 1

    ER -