Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers

Matthias Hänggi, Heidi Yppärilä, Jukka Takala, Ilkka Korhonen, Martin Luginbuehl, Steen Petersen-Felix, Stephan Jakob (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2–4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 μg/mL ± 0.51 versus 1.32 ± 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 ± 0.47 versus 1.86 ± 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1728-1736
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Auditory Evoked Potentials
Propofol
Healthy Volunteers
Deep Sedation
remifentanil
Critical Care
Evoked Potentials
Volunteers

Keywords

  • evoked potentials
  • event-related potentials
  • sedation
  • patient monitoring
  • propofol
  • remifantanil
  • critical care

Cite this

Hänggi, Matthias ; Yppärilä, Heidi ; Takala, Jukka ; Korhonen, Ilkka ; Luginbuehl, Martin ; Petersen-Felix, Steen ; Jakob, Stephan. / Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2004 ; Vol. 99, No. 6. pp. 1728-1736.
@article{7701b7b92e224fde9baecb751a82283f,
title = "Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers",
abstract = "Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2–4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 μg/mL ± 0.51 versus 1.32 ± 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 ± 0.47 versus 1.86 ± 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.",
keywords = "evoked potentials, event-related potentials, sedation, patient monitoring, propofol, remifantanil, critical care",
author = "Matthias H{\"a}nggi and Heidi Ypp{\"a}ril{\"a} and Jukka Takala and Ilkka Korhonen and Martin Luginbuehl and Steen Petersen-Felix and Stephan Jakob",
note = "Project code: T3SU00087",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1213/01.ANE.0000135634.46493.0A",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "1728--1736",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. / Hänggi, Matthias; Yppärilä, Heidi; Takala, Jukka; Korhonen, Ilkka; Luginbuehl, Martin; Petersen-Felix, Steen; Jakob, Stephan (Corresponding Author).

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 99, No. 6, 2004, p. 1728-1736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers

AU - Hänggi, Matthias

AU - Yppärilä, Heidi

AU - Takala, Jukka

AU - Korhonen, Ilkka

AU - Luginbuehl, Martin

AU - Petersen-Felix, Steen

AU - Jakob, Stephan

N1 - Project code: T3SU00087

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2–4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 μg/mL ± 0.51 versus 1.32 ± 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 ± 0.47 versus 1.86 ± 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.

AB - Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2–4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 μg/mL ± 0.51 versus 1.32 ± 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 ± 0.47 versus 1.86 ± 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.

KW - evoked potentials

KW - event-related potentials

KW - sedation

KW - patient monitoring

KW - propofol

KW - remifantanil

KW - critical care

U2 - 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135634.46493.0A

DO - 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135634.46493.0A

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 1728

EP - 1736

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 6

ER -