Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: a comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching

Valerio Funari, Jarno Mäkinen, Justin Salminen, Roberto Braga (Corresponding Author), Enrico Dinelli, Hannu Revitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90%), Al and Mn (>85%), Cr (~65%), Ga (~60%), and Ce (~50%). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95%), Fe (91%), and Ni (93%), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76%), Pb (59%), and Co (55%). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-406
Number of pages10
JournalWaste Management
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

incineration
municipal solid waste
fly ash
leaching
metal
chemical
removal
comparison
solubility
salt
bacterium
acid
cost
experiment

Keywords

  • bioleaching
  • critical elements
  • metal removal
  • municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash
  • S- and Fe-oxidizing bacteria
  • sulphuric acid leaching
  • Metal removal

Cite this

Funari, Valerio ; Mäkinen, Jarno ; Salminen, Justin ; Braga, Roberto ; Dinelli, Enrico ; Revitzer, Hannu. / Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: a comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching. In: Waste Management. 2017 ; Vol. 60. pp. 397-406.
@article{b6a44773b7dc4f3c8979b1814b5c1632,
title = "Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: a comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching",
abstract = "Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90{\%}), Al and Mn (>85{\%}), Cr (~65{\%}), Ga (~60{\%}), and Ce (~50{\%}). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95{\%}), Fe (91{\%}), and Ni (93{\%}), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76{\%}), Pb (59{\%}), and Co (55{\%}). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.",
keywords = "bioleaching, critical elements, metal removal, municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash, S- and Fe-oxidizing bacteria, sulphuric acid leaching, Metal removal",
author = "Valerio Funari and Jarno M{\"a}kinen and Justin Salminen and Roberto Braga and Enrico Dinelli and Hannu Revitzer",
note = "ISI: ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.025",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "397--406",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: a comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching. / Funari, Valerio; Mäkinen, Jarno; Salminen, Justin; Braga, Roberto (Corresponding Author); Dinelli, Enrico; Revitzer, Hannu.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 60, 01.02.2017, p. 397-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metal removal from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash: a comparison between chemical leaching and bioleaching

AU - Funari, Valerio

AU - Mäkinen, Jarno

AU - Salminen, Justin

AU - Braga, Roberto

AU - Dinelli, Enrico

AU - Revitzer, Hannu

N1 - ISI: ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90%), Al and Mn (>85%), Cr (~65%), Ga (~60%), and Ce (~50%). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95%), Fe (91%), and Ni (93%), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76%), Pb (59%), and Co (55%). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.

AB - Bio- and hydrometallurgical experimental setups at 2-l reactor scale for the processing of fly ash from municipal waste incinerators were explored. We aimed to compare chemical H2SO4 leaching and bioleaching; the latter involved the use of H2SO4 and a mixed culture of acidophilic bacteria. The leaching yields of several elements, including some of those considered as critical (Mg, Co, Ce, Cr, Ga, Nb, Nd, Sb and Sm), are provided. At the end of the experiments, both leaching methods resulted in comparable yields for Mg and Zn (>90%), Al and Mn (>85%), Cr (~65%), Ga (~60%), and Ce (~50%). Chemical leaching showed the best yields for Cu (95%), Fe (91%), and Ni (93%), whereas bioleaching was effective for Nd (76%), Pb (59%), and Co (55%). The two leaching methods generated solids of different quality with respect to the original material as we removed and significantly reduced the metals amounts, and enriched solutions where metals can be recovered for example as mixed salts for further treatment. Compared to chemical leaching the bioleaching halved the use of H2SO4, i.e., a part of agent costs, as a likely consequence of bio-produced acid and improved metal solubility.

KW - bioleaching

KW - critical elements

KW - metal removal

KW - municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash

KW - S- and Fe-oxidizing bacteria

KW - sulphuric acid leaching

KW - Metal removal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979746825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.025

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.025

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 397

EP - 406

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -