Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation

Maria Antikainen, Marko Mäkipää, Mikko Ahonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

168 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities? Design/methodology/approach: The exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open-ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e-mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes. Findings: Results suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider. Research limitations/implications: The data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found. Practical implications: Companies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-119
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Innovation Management
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Innovation
Open innovation
Internet
Industry
Factors

Keywords

  • Communities
  • Innovation
  • Intermediaries
  • Motivation (psychology)
  • Online operations

Cite this

Antikainen, Maria ; Mäkipää, Marko ; Ahonen, Mikko. / Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. In: European Journal of Innovation Management. 2010 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 100-119.
@article{e79b772ef7b244658a9dfc92c982817a,
title = "Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities? Design/methodology/approach: The exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open-ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e-mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes. Findings: Results suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider. Research limitations/implications: The data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found. Practical implications: Companies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.",
keywords = "Communities, Innovation, Intermediaries, Motivation (psychology), Online operations",
author = "Maria Antikainen and Marko M{\"a}kip{\"a}{\"a} and Mikko Ahonen",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/14601061011013258",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "100--119",
journal = "European Journal of Innovation Management",
issn = "1460-1060",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. / Antikainen, Maria; Mäkipää, Marko; Ahonen, Mikko.

In: European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 100-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation

AU - Antikainen, Maria

AU - Mäkipää, Marko

AU - Ahonen, Mikko

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities? Design/methodology/approach: The exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open-ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e-mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes. Findings: Results suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider. Research limitations/implications: The data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found. Practical implications: Companies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities? Design/methodology/approach: The exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open-ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e-mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes. Findings: Results suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider. Research limitations/implications: The data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found. Practical implications: Companies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.

KW - Communities

KW - Innovation

KW - Intermediaries

KW - Motivation (psychology)

KW - Online operations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349098179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14601061011013258

DO - 10.1108/14601061011013258

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:74349098179

VL - 13

SP - 100

EP - 119

JO - European Journal of Innovation Management

JF - European Journal of Innovation Management

SN - 1460-1060

IS - 1

ER -