Multimodal Microorganism Development: Integrating Top-Down Biological Engineering with Bottom-Up Rational Design

Matthew S. Dahabieh, Johan M. Thevelein, Brian Gibson (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Biological engineering has unprecedented potential to solve society's most pressing challenges. Engineering approaches must consider complex technical, economic, and social factors. This requires methods that confer gene/pathway-level functionality and organism-level robustness in rapid and cost-effective ways. This article compares foundational engineering approaches – bottom-up, gene-targeted engineering, and top-down, whole-genome engineering – and identifies significant complementarity between them. Cases drawn from engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae exemplify the synergy of a combined approach. Indeed, multimodal engineering streamlines strain development by leveraging the complementarity of whole-genome and gene-targeted engineering to overcome the gap in design knowledge that restricts rational design. As biological engineers target more complex systems, this dual-track approach is poised to become an increasingly important tool to realize the promise of synthetic biology.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends in Biotechnology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Oct 2019
MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

Fingerprint

Bioengineering
Microorganisms
Genes
Genome
Synthetic Biology
Yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Large scale systems
Economics
Engineers
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • bioeconomy
  • biological engineering
  • biotechnology
  • microbial cell factory
  • rational design
  • synthetic biology

Cite this

@article{1289a11eb87647cfb4ec47f7195973e9,
title = "Multimodal Microorganism Development: Integrating Top-Down Biological Engineering with Bottom-Up Rational Design",
abstract = "Biological engineering has unprecedented potential to solve society's most pressing challenges. Engineering approaches must consider complex technical, economic, and social factors. This requires methods that confer gene/pathway-level functionality and organism-level robustness in rapid and cost-effective ways. This article compares foundational engineering approaches – bottom-up, gene-targeted engineering, and top-down, whole-genome engineering – and identifies significant complementarity between them. Cases drawn from engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae exemplify the synergy of a combined approach. Indeed, multimodal engineering streamlines strain development by leveraging the complementarity of whole-genome and gene-targeted engineering to overcome the gap in design knowledge that restricts rational design. As biological engineers target more complex systems, this dual-track approach is poised to become an increasingly important tool to realize the promise of synthetic biology.",
keywords = "bioeconomy, biological engineering, biotechnology, microbial cell factory, rational design, synthetic biology",
author = "Dahabieh, {Matthew S.} and Thevelein, {Johan M.} and Brian Gibson",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.09.006",
language = "English",
journal = "Trends in Biotechnology",
issn = "0167-7799",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Multimodal Microorganism Development : Integrating Top-Down Biological Engineering with Bottom-Up Rational Design. / Dahabieh, Matthew S.; Thevelein, Johan M.; Gibson, Brian (Corresponding Author).

In: Trends in Biotechnology, 22.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multimodal Microorganism Development

T2 - Integrating Top-Down Biological Engineering with Bottom-Up Rational Design

AU - Dahabieh, Matthew S.

AU - Thevelein, Johan M.

AU - Gibson, Brian

PY - 2019/10/22

Y1 - 2019/10/22

N2 - Biological engineering has unprecedented potential to solve society's most pressing challenges. Engineering approaches must consider complex technical, economic, and social factors. This requires methods that confer gene/pathway-level functionality and organism-level robustness in rapid and cost-effective ways. This article compares foundational engineering approaches – bottom-up, gene-targeted engineering, and top-down, whole-genome engineering – and identifies significant complementarity between them. Cases drawn from engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae exemplify the synergy of a combined approach. Indeed, multimodal engineering streamlines strain development by leveraging the complementarity of whole-genome and gene-targeted engineering to overcome the gap in design knowledge that restricts rational design. As biological engineers target more complex systems, this dual-track approach is poised to become an increasingly important tool to realize the promise of synthetic biology.

AB - Biological engineering has unprecedented potential to solve society's most pressing challenges. Engineering approaches must consider complex technical, economic, and social factors. This requires methods that confer gene/pathway-level functionality and organism-level robustness in rapid and cost-effective ways. This article compares foundational engineering approaches – bottom-up, gene-targeted engineering, and top-down, whole-genome engineering – and identifies significant complementarity between them. Cases drawn from engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae exemplify the synergy of a combined approach. Indeed, multimodal engineering streamlines strain development by leveraging the complementarity of whole-genome and gene-targeted engineering to overcome the gap in design knowledge that restricts rational design. As biological engineers target more complex systems, this dual-track approach is poised to become an increasingly important tool to realize the promise of synthetic biology.

KW - bioeconomy

KW - biological engineering

KW - biotechnology

KW - microbial cell factory

KW - rational design

KW - synthetic biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073953753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.09.006

M3 - Review Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073953753

JO - Trends in Biotechnology

JF - Trends in Biotechnology

SN - 0167-7799

ER -