Nanotechnology perceptions

Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives

Anna Leinonen, Sirkku Kivisaari

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nanotechnology development is in its early phase and there is a growing debate on its potential benefits and risks. This report reviews literature on public opinion and NGO perspectives concerning nanotechnology. It starts with a discussion on the position of public in the context of nanotechnology development. Different constructions of public (citizens, consumers, human beings, popula-tions, patients) contain different understandings of the possibilities for action, responsibilities and needs for information. The report discusses the role of news media in nanotechnology communication. One central issue is message framing which refers to the context in which an issue is presented. Framing of nanotechnology in newspapers has changed in time. In the late 1990s scientific framing was common but currently more varied frames are used, e.g. societal implications of nanotechnology. The report reveals that general knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people is currently very low. However, various studies suggest that lay people are able to consider complicated technological and scientific developments from wide perspectives, if they are provided with proper possibilities for that. The analysis indicated that NGOs view nanotechnology not only from the perspective of health and safety, but also from the perspective of its societal implications. The NGOs point out the importance of public transparency and societal relevance of nanotechnology research and development. The lack of knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people creates challenges for communication. Making information available is important. However, various studies have indicated that feelings and values have an important role to play in the formation of nanotechnology perceptions. This is why an interactive and dialogical approach may be more effective than one-way information in communicating a message about nanotechnology to the public.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages62
ISBN (Electronic)978-951-38-7668-5
ISBN (Print)978-951-38-7667-8
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

NameVTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes
PublisherVTT
No.2559
ISSN (Print)1235-0605
ISSN (Electronic)1455-0865

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
non-governmental organization
public opinion
coverage
literature
communication
available information
research and development
transparency
newspaper
news
citizen

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • public opinion
  • NGO perception
  • Media
  • communication

Cite this

Leinonen, A., & Kivisaari, S. (2010). Nanotechnology perceptions: Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes, No. 2559
Leinonen, Anna ; Kivisaari, Sirkku. / Nanotechnology perceptions : Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2010. 62 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes; No. 2559).
@book{8a1f366d1aac431b896ea5251f498231,
title = "Nanotechnology perceptions: Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives",
abstract = "Nanotechnology development is in its early phase and there is a growing debate on its potential benefits and risks. This report reviews literature on public opinion and NGO perspectives concerning nanotechnology. It starts with a discussion on the position of public in the context of nanotechnology development. Different constructions of public (citizens, consumers, human beings, popula-tions, patients) contain different understandings of the possibilities for action, responsibilities and needs for information. The report discusses the role of news media in nanotechnology communication. One central issue is message framing which refers to the context in which an issue is presented. Framing of nanotechnology in newspapers has changed in time. In the late 1990s scientific framing was common but currently more varied frames are used, e.g. societal implications of nanotechnology. The report reveals that general knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people is currently very low. However, various studies suggest that lay people are able to consider complicated technological and scientific developments from wide perspectives, if they are provided with proper possibilities for that. The analysis indicated that NGOs view nanotechnology not only from the perspective of health and safety, but also from the perspective of its societal implications. The NGOs point out the importance of public transparency and societal relevance of nanotechnology research and development. The lack of knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people creates challenges for communication. Making information available is important. However, various studies have indicated that feelings and values have an important role to play in the formation of nanotechnology perceptions. This is why an interactive and dialogical approach may be more effective than one-way information in communicating a message about nanotechnology to the public.",
keywords = "Nanotechnology, public opinion, NGO perception, Media, communication",
author = "Anna Leinonen and Sirkku Kivisaari",
note = "Project code: 40275",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-951-38-7667-8",
series = "VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "2559",
address = "Finland",

}

Leinonen, A & Kivisaari, S 2010, Nanotechnology perceptions: Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives. VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes, no. 2559, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Nanotechnology perceptions : Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives. / Leinonen, Anna; Kivisaari, Sirkku.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2010. 62 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes; No. 2559).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Nanotechnology perceptions

T2 - Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives

AU - Leinonen, Anna

AU - Kivisaari, Sirkku

N1 - Project code: 40275

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Nanotechnology development is in its early phase and there is a growing debate on its potential benefits and risks. This report reviews literature on public opinion and NGO perspectives concerning nanotechnology. It starts with a discussion on the position of public in the context of nanotechnology development. Different constructions of public (citizens, consumers, human beings, popula-tions, patients) contain different understandings of the possibilities for action, responsibilities and needs for information. The report discusses the role of news media in nanotechnology communication. One central issue is message framing which refers to the context in which an issue is presented. Framing of nanotechnology in newspapers has changed in time. In the late 1990s scientific framing was common but currently more varied frames are used, e.g. societal implications of nanotechnology. The report reveals that general knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people is currently very low. However, various studies suggest that lay people are able to consider complicated technological and scientific developments from wide perspectives, if they are provided with proper possibilities for that. The analysis indicated that NGOs view nanotechnology not only from the perspective of health and safety, but also from the perspective of its societal implications. The NGOs point out the importance of public transparency and societal relevance of nanotechnology research and development. The lack of knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people creates challenges for communication. Making information available is important. However, various studies have indicated that feelings and values have an important role to play in the formation of nanotechnology perceptions. This is why an interactive and dialogical approach may be more effective than one-way information in communicating a message about nanotechnology to the public.

AB - Nanotechnology development is in its early phase and there is a growing debate on its potential benefits and risks. This report reviews literature on public opinion and NGO perspectives concerning nanotechnology. It starts with a discussion on the position of public in the context of nanotechnology development. Different constructions of public (citizens, consumers, human beings, popula-tions, patients) contain different understandings of the possibilities for action, responsibilities and needs for information. The report discusses the role of news media in nanotechnology communication. One central issue is message framing which refers to the context in which an issue is presented. Framing of nanotechnology in newspapers has changed in time. In the late 1990s scientific framing was common but currently more varied frames are used, e.g. societal implications of nanotechnology. The report reveals that general knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people is currently very low. However, various studies suggest that lay people are able to consider complicated technological and scientific developments from wide perspectives, if they are provided with proper possibilities for that. The analysis indicated that NGOs view nanotechnology not only from the perspective of health and safety, but also from the perspective of its societal implications. The NGOs point out the importance of public transparency and societal relevance of nanotechnology research and development. The lack of knowledge of nanotechnology among lay people creates challenges for communication. Making information available is important. However, various studies have indicated that feelings and values have an important role to play in the formation of nanotechnology perceptions. This is why an interactive and dialogical approach may be more effective than one-way information in communicating a message about nanotechnology to the public.

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - public opinion

KW - NGO perception

KW - Media

KW - communication

M3 - Report

SN - 978-951-38-7667-8

T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes

BT - Nanotechnology perceptions

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Leinonen A, Kivisaari S. Nanotechnology perceptions: Literature review on media coverage, public opinion and NGO perspectives. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2010. 62 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes; No. 2559).