Abstract
This work reviews both current methods and new
developments in treating spectral interferences in
multivariate calibration. Essentially all pretreatment
techniques fall into six categories.
Spectral transformations used for the linearization of
spectral data.
Variety of techniques such as offset and slope
corrections, derivatives, baseline corrections, row-wise
normalizations, wavelets etc. These techniques are
essentially targeted for spectral intensity variations
etc.
Techniques handling specific interferences such as
optical path length differences (scattering etc), known
spectral interferences and external (experimental or
process) parameters.
Techniques removing spectral variation that is not
correlated with response data.
Ensemble methods estimating spectral interferences and
using data augmentation in order to get robust
multivariate models.
Selectivity enhancements using either net analyte signal
(NAS) or science-based calibration (SBC).
In overall, current methods and practices provide a very
different means to treat spectral data. We would like to
put emphasizes on guaranteed selectivity using SBC which
potentially delivers clear opportunities over traditional
chemometrics. The key question is how to ensure
selectivity and treat spectral interferences efficiently
at the same time. For example, most of the techniques do
not guarantee selectivity as they are influenced by
spurious and unspecific correlations when it comes to PLS
or equivalent modeling following the pretreatment step.
The NAS method guarantees selectivity but does not
properly account for interferences. It operates like an
ordinary CLS method. Selectivity is sacrificed at the
expense of sensitivity.
It is crucial for industry to become aware that
selectivity is not guaranteed. The current practice in
industry is that predictive ability is over-appreciated
as pretreatments are often selected based on what
improves model and its predictive ability. There is
nothing bad in this approach if models are validated
properly. Unfortunately, we can hardly ever validate
models against all unknown spectral interferences in the
process. In this work we focus on SBC as it provides a
means to handle spectral noise and to guarantee
selectivity. We try to show that there is an alternative
and cost effective approach to develop robust, sensitive
and selective models and methods. Such measures are
especially important in pharmaceutical industry where PAT
developments are in focus. The method described here is
directly applicable to process monitoring, method
development, quality control and calibration transfer.
The method is also directly applicable to all
spectroscopic instruments whether UV, visible, NIR, IR or
Raman. Simple demonstration on a multi-component system
is provided as an example on the results achievable with
new SBC calibration method including cross-sensitivities
and selectivity measures
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Book of abstracts, EuroPACT 2008 |
Publisher | DECHEMA |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
MoE publication type | B3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings |
Event | 1st European Conference on Process Analytics and Control Technology, EuroPACT 2008 - Frankfurt am Main, Germany Duration: 22 Apr 2008 → 25 Apr 2008 |
Conference
Conference | 1st European Conference on Process Analytics and Control Technology, EuroPACT 2008 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Germany |
City | Frankfurt am Main |
Period | 22/04/08 → 25/04/08 |