TY - JOUR
T1 - Nordic experiences with smart mobility
T2 - 47th European Transport Conference, ETC 2019
AU - Ydersbond, Inga Margrete
AU - Auvinen, Heidi
AU - Tuominen, Anu
AU - Fearnley, Nils
AU - Aarhaug, Jørgen
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded in part by the Research Council of Norway via the REGSMART project (Regulating smart mobility: Addressing challenges and opportunities in the digital transition of mobility; project number 283327).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In a time where emerging technologies bundled within “smart mobility” represent a new transformation of the mobility system, it is critical that governments pro-actively take part in these developments. This means steering measures to ensure that the benefits of innovative technologies contribute towards a sustainable mobility system and avoiding the risk of increased attractiveness and use of private motorized transport, such as private cars. New technologies, largely accelerated by the ongoing digital transformation in mobility, have the potential to disrupt existing market structures entirely. Existing legal and regulatory frameworks may not be prepared for accommodating new and innovative services. It is therefore critical to gain more a thorough understanding of how new smart mobility services need and may be governed through regulatory frameworks. This paper looks into approaches and experiences in Finland and Norway, focusing on the role the public authorities have adopted in the two countries with respect to smart mobility solutions and emerging Mobility as a Service (MaaS) offerings in particular. The paper first presents a typology of new mobility services and a review of emerging services. An analysis is then presented of the interplay between the government as a regulatory authority and the new MaaS initiatives, drawing on the frameworks by Docherty et al. (2018) on elements and challenges related to the transition to smarter mobility. Our main finding is that the services available on the street and challenges faced by the authorities in the short run are surprisingly similar, but that the toolbox available and the long run challenges may prove more diverging.
AB - In a time where emerging technologies bundled within “smart mobility” represent a new transformation of the mobility system, it is critical that governments pro-actively take part in these developments. This means steering measures to ensure that the benefits of innovative technologies contribute towards a sustainable mobility system and avoiding the risk of increased attractiveness and use of private motorized transport, such as private cars. New technologies, largely accelerated by the ongoing digital transformation in mobility, have the potential to disrupt existing market structures entirely. Existing legal and regulatory frameworks may not be prepared for accommodating new and innovative services. It is therefore critical to gain more a thorough understanding of how new smart mobility services need and may be governed through regulatory frameworks. This paper looks into approaches and experiences in Finland and Norway, focusing on the role the public authorities have adopted in the two countries with respect to smart mobility solutions and emerging Mobility as a Service (MaaS) offerings in particular. The paper first presents a typology of new mobility services and a review of emerging services. An analysis is then presented of the interplay between the government as a regulatory authority and the new MaaS initiatives, drawing on the frameworks by Docherty et al. (2018) on elements and challenges related to the transition to smarter mobility. Our main finding is that the services available on the street and challenges faced by the authorities in the short run are surprisingly similar, but that the toolbox available and the long run challenges may prove more diverging.
KW - Finland
KW - Governance
KW - MaaS
KW - Norway
KW - Smart mobility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096493778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.09.012
M3 - Article in a proceedings journal
AN - SCOPUS:85096493778
SN - 2352-1457
VL - 49
SP - 130
EP - 144
JO - Transportation Research Procedia
JF - Transportation Research Procedia
Y2 - 9 October 2019 through 11 October 2019
ER -