Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 273-277 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1992 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Nordic teleradiology development. / Viitanen, Jari; Sund, Torbjörn; Rinde, E.; Stoermer, J.; Kormano, Martti; Heinilä, Juhani; Yliaho, Jussi; Ahonen, Juha.
In: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1992, p. 273-277.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Nordic teleradiology development
AU - Viitanen, Jari
AU - Sund, Torbjörn
AU - Rinde, E.
AU - Stoermer, J.
AU - Kormano, Martti
AU - Heinilä, Juhani
AU - Yliaho, Jussi
AU - Ahonen, Juha
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - In the Nordic countries there are several reasons why teleradiology has been an interesting topic of research during the last years. The distances in rural areas are long, and radiology expert service is not available in every health centre which is able to provide X-rays. Also, the telecommunication network is on a very advanced level in the Nordic countries. The staff is well educated and they are used to operating with computers. This all means that the infrastructure to develop and use systems like teleradiology exists. This paper describes two separate systems developed in Norway and Finland. Their development has been in many respects the same. The common hardware and software features, as well as the differences and the clinical experiences, are discussed in this paper.
AB - In the Nordic countries there are several reasons why teleradiology has been an interesting topic of research during the last years. The distances in rural areas are long, and radiology expert service is not available in every health centre which is able to provide X-rays. Also, the telecommunication network is on a very advanced level in the Nordic countries. The staff is well educated and they are used to operating with computers. This all means that the infrastructure to develop and use systems like teleradiology exists. This paper describes two separate systems developed in Norway and Finland. Their development has been in many respects the same. The common hardware and software features, as well as the differences and the clinical experiences, are discussed in this paper.
U2 - 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90038-9
DO - 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90038-9
M3 - Article
VL - 37
SP - 273
EP - 277
JO - Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
JF - Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
SN - 0169-2607
IS - 4
ER -