Nutrient retention in the vegetation of an overland flow treatment system in northern Finland

Antti Huttunen (Corresponding Author), Kaisa Heikkinen, Raimo Ihme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of vegetation for nutrient retention was estimated in an overland flow area (OFA) in northern Finland, where peat mining water is purified by conducting it across a virgin mire. In the OFA the phytomass of herbs, sedges, graminoids and below-ground parts of plants was greater, and that of shrubs and bryophytes smaller, than in a reference area (RA). Overland flow treatment favoured plant species, such as Menyanthes trifoliata and Carex lasiocarpa, and discriminated against Sphagnum spp. in particular. The differences in the nutrient contents of plants in the OFA resulting from nutrient enrichment by peat mining water were compared with the actual decrease in amounts of nutrients in the area. Total phytomass in the OFA increased by 20%, and its N concentration increased from 1.00 to 1.24% of dry weight, but the P concentration decreased from 0.26 to 0.22% of dry weight. These changes in total phytomass and nutrient concentrations resulted in a 40% increase in the N bound by plants in the area, but a 5% decrease in P. The increase in N bound by the total phytomass in the OFA during the 6 years of usage accounted for only about 4% of the observed total retention of inorganic N. In contrast, the vegetation in the area served as a source of P rather than a sink, with the decrease in P accounting for nearly 20% of the measured PO4-P retention. The average total decreases in both P and N in the OFA in 1987–1991 were 55%. Thus, the net retention of N and P from the peat mining water was mainly the result of other processes rather than retention in the plant cover.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-73
Number of pages13
JournalAquatic Botany
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

nutrient retention
overland flow
Finland
phytomass
vegetation
nutrient
peat
Menyanthes trifoliata
nutrient content
Carex lasiocarpa
food enrichment
underground parts
water
Sphagnum
mire
nutrient enrichment
bryophyte
Cyperaceae
ground cover plants
herb

Cite this

Huttunen, Antti ; Heikkinen, Kaisa ; Ihme, Raimo. / Nutrient retention in the vegetation of an overland flow treatment system in northern Finland. In: Aquatic Botany. 1996 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 61-73.
@article{b26ed9b1e4f945d9a726a9c24d1529af,
title = "Nutrient retention in the vegetation of an overland flow treatment system in northern Finland",
abstract = "The importance of vegetation for nutrient retention was estimated in an overland flow area (OFA) in northern Finland, where peat mining water is purified by conducting it across a virgin mire. In the OFA the phytomass of herbs, sedges, graminoids and below-ground parts of plants was greater, and that of shrubs and bryophytes smaller, than in a reference area (RA). Overland flow treatment favoured plant species, such as Menyanthes trifoliata and Carex lasiocarpa, and discriminated against Sphagnum spp. in particular. The differences in the nutrient contents of plants in the OFA resulting from nutrient enrichment by peat mining water were compared with the actual decrease in amounts of nutrients in the area. Total phytomass in the OFA increased by 20{\%}, and its N concentration increased from 1.00 to 1.24{\%} of dry weight, but the P concentration decreased from 0.26 to 0.22{\%} of dry weight. These changes in total phytomass and nutrient concentrations resulted in a 40{\%} increase in the N bound by plants in the area, but a 5{\%} decrease in P. The increase in N bound by the total phytomass in the OFA during the 6 years of usage accounted for only about 4{\%} of the observed total retention of inorganic N. In contrast, the vegetation in the area served as a source of P rather than a sink, with the decrease in P accounting for nearly 20{\%} of the measured PO4-P retention. The average total decreases in both P and N in the OFA in 1987–1991 were 55{\%}. Thus, the net retention of N and P from the peat mining water was mainly the result of other processes rather than retention in the plant cover.",
author = "Antti Huttunen and Kaisa Heikkinen and Raimo Ihme",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1016/0304-3770(96)01053-4",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "61--73",
journal = "Aquatic Botany",
issn = "0304-3770",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Nutrient retention in the vegetation of an overland flow treatment system in northern Finland. / Huttunen, Antti (Corresponding Author); Heikkinen, Kaisa; Ihme, Raimo.

In: Aquatic Botany, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1996, p. 61-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrient retention in the vegetation of an overland flow treatment system in northern Finland

AU - Huttunen, Antti

AU - Heikkinen, Kaisa

AU - Ihme, Raimo

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The importance of vegetation for nutrient retention was estimated in an overland flow area (OFA) in northern Finland, where peat mining water is purified by conducting it across a virgin mire. In the OFA the phytomass of herbs, sedges, graminoids and below-ground parts of plants was greater, and that of shrubs and bryophytes smaller, than in a reference area (RA). Overland flow treatment favoured plant species, such as Menyanthes trifoliata and Carex lasiocarpa, and discriminated against Sphagnum spp. in particular. The differences in the nutrient contents of plants in the OFA resulting from nutrient enrichment by peat mining water were compared with the actual decrease in amounts of nutrients in the area. Total phytomass in the OFA increased by 20%, and its N concentration increased from 1.00 to 1.24% of dry weight, but the P concentration decreased from 0.26 to 0.22% of dry weight. These changes in total phytomass and nutrient concentrations resulted in a 40% increase in the N bound by plants in the area, but a 5% decrease in P. The increase in N bound by the total phytomass in the OFA during the 6 years of usage accounted for only about 4% of the observed total retention of inorganic N. In contrast, the vegetation in the area served as a source of P rather than a sink, with the decrease in P accounting for nearly 20% of the measured PO4-P retention. The average total decreases in both P and N in the OFA in 1987–1991 were 55%. Thus, the net retention of N and P from the peat mining water was mainly the result of other processes rather than retention in the plant cover.

AB - The importance of vegetation for nutrient retention was estimated in an overland flow area (OFA) in northern Finland, where peat mining water is purified by conducting it across a virgin mire. In the OFA the phytomass of herbs, sedges, graminoids and below-ground parts of plants was greater, and that of shrubs and bryophytes smaller, than in a reference area (RA). Overland flow treatment favoured plant species, such as Menyanthes trifoliata and Carex lasiocarpa, and discriminated against Sphagnum spp. in particular. The differences in the nutrient contents of plants in the OFA resulting from nutrient enrichment by peat mining water were compared with the actual decrease in amounts of nutrients in the area. Total phytomass in the OFA increased by 20%, and its N concentration increased from 1.00 to 1.24% of dry weight, but the P concentration decreased from 0.26 to 0.22% of dry weight. These changes in total phytomass and nutrient concentrations resulted in a 40% increase in the N bound by plants in the area, but a 5% decrease in P. The increase in N bound by the total phytomass in the OFA during the 6 years of usage accounted for only about 4% of the observed total retention of inorganic N. In contrast, the vegetation in the area served as a source of P rather than a sink, with the decrease in P accounting for nearly 20% of the measured PO4-P retention. The average total decreases in both P and N in the OFA in 1987–1991 were 55%. Thus, the net retention of N and P from the peat mining water was mainly the result of other processes rather than retention in the plant cover.

U2 - 10.1016/0304-3770(96)01053-4

DO - 10.1016/0304-3770(96)01053-4

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 61

EP - 73

JO - Aquatic Botany

JF - Aquatic Botany

SN - 0304-3770

IS - 1

ER -